인터뷰·페어·그룹 구술 시험에 대한 인식 및 수행 비교조사
An investigation of perceptions of and performance on interview, pair, and group oral tests
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated Korean university students’perceptions of and attitudes to Interview Oral Test(IOT), Pair Oral Test(POT), Group Oral Test(GOT) and compared their performance on the tests in order to see whether POT, GOT are practically effective and valid test formats compared to IOT. For the study, 28 university students participated all of the three tests and completed a questionnaire on perceptions of the test formats. The findings from the study were as follows: first, students showed overall positive attitudes to all three test formats; secondly, students preferred GOT to IOT or POT, and felt more comfortable in GOT than the other two tests; and lastly, the students performed better in POT, GOT than in IOT. Based on the findings of this study, it was concluded that the use of POT or GOT should be considered at the Korean university context. They may be more practical and appropriate for the assessment of achievement during or at the end of the course than IOT.
Abstract
This study investigated Korean university students’perceptions of and attitudes to Interview Oral Test(IOT), Pair Oral Test(POT), Group Oral Test(GOT) and compared their performance on the tests in order to see whether POT, GOT are practically effective and valid test formats compared to IOT. For the study, 28 university students participated all of the three tests and completed a questionnaire on perceptions of the test formats. The findings from the study were as follows: first, students showed overall positive attitudes to all three test formats; secondly, students preferred GOT to IOT or POT, and felt more comfortable in GOT than the other two tests; and lastly, the students performed better in POT, GOT than in IOT. Based on the findings of this study, it was concluded that the use of POT or GOT should be considered at the Korean university context. They may be more practical and appropriate for the assessment of achievement during or at the end of the course than IOT.
참고문헌 (38)
- Berkoff, N. A., "New directions in language testing", pp.93~99 (1985), Pergamon Press
- Bonk, W. J., "A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task", Language Testing, 20, pp.89~110 (2003)
- Bonk, W. J., "L2 group oral testing: The influence of shyness", outgoingness, match of interlocutors’ proficiency level, and gender on individual scores, 2004, ~
- Brooks, L., "Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency : Co-constructing a better performance", Language Testing, 26(3), pp.341~366 (2009)
- Brown, A., "Test development process : Test-takers' reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese", Language Testing, 10, pp.277~303 (1993)
- Davis, L., "The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment", Language Testing, 26(3), pp.367~396 (2009)
- Deffenbacher, J. L. S., "Effects of test anxiety on performance, worry and emotionality in naturally occurring exams", Psychology in the Schools, 15, pp.446~449 (1978)
- Egyud, G., "Oral testing in pairs : A secondary school perspective", English Language Teaching Journal, 55, pp.70~76 (2001)
- French, A., "Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge proficiency in English examination 1913–2002", pp.2003, UCLES
- Folland, D., "Towards objectivity in group oral testing", English Language Teaching Journal, 30, pp.156~167 (1976)
- Fulcher, G., "Testing tasks : Issues in task design and the group oral", Language Testing, 13, pp.23~51 (1996)
- Galaczi, E. D., "Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test : The case of the first certificate in English examination", Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), pp.89~119 (2008)
- Gan, Z., "Interaction in group oral assessment : A case study of higher-and lower-scoring students", Language Testing, 27(4), pp.585~602 (2010)
- He, L., "A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion", Language Testing, 23, pp.370~402 (2006)
- Hughes, A., "Testing for language teachers" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Johnson, M., "The art of nonconversation." (2001), Yale University Press
- Johnson, M., "Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency", pp.27~52 (1998), Benjamins
- 주미진, "The attitudes of students’ and teachers’ toward a Computerized Oral Test (COT) and a Face-To-Face Interview (FTFI) in a Korean u", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.171~193 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- Kenyon, D. M., "Comparing examinee attitudes toward computer-assisted and other oral proficiency assessments", Language Learning and Technology, 5, pp.60~83 (2001)
- Kormos, J., "Simulating conversation in oral-proficiency assessment : A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams", Language Testing, 16, pp.163~188 (1999)
- Liski, E., "A study of the statistical foundations of group conversation tests in spoken English", Language Learning, 33, pp.225~246 (1983)
- Lowe, P., "Reviews of English language testing", pp.43~47 (1987), TESOL
- Lowe, P., "Testing speaking proficiency : The oral interview." (1986), ERIC Digest
- Morrison, D. M., "New directions in language testing", pp.85~92 (1985), Pergamon Institute of English
- O’Loughlin, K., "The equivalence of direct and semi-direct speaking tests (studies in language testing B)" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- O’Sullivan, B., "Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair task performance", Language Testing, 19, pp.277~295 (2002)
- Saville, N., "Assessing speaking in the revised FCE", English Language Teaching Journal, 53, pp.42~51 (1999)
- Scott, M. L., "Student affective reactions to oral language tests", Language Testing, 3(1), pp.99~118 (1986)
- Shohamy, E., "Affective considerations in language testing", Modern Language Journal, 66, pp.13~17 (1982)
- Shohamy, E., "Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency", English Language Teaching Journal, 40, pp.212~220 (1986)
- Skehan, P., "Issues in the testing of English for specific purposes", Language Testing, 1, pp.202~220 (1984)
- Taylor, L., "Investigating the paired speaking test format", Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 2, ~ (2000)
- van Lier, L., "Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching and fainting in coils : Oral proficiency interviews as conversations", TESOL Quarterly, 23, pp.480~508 (1989)
- Webb, N., "Group collaboration in assessment : Competing objectives, processes, and outcomes", pp.1994, CRESST
- Wilds, C., "Testing kit: French and Spanish", pp.171~199 (1979), Foreign Service Institute
- Young, R., "Discourse variation in oral proficiency interviews", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.403~424 (1992)
- Zeidner, M., "College students' attitudes towards written versus oral tests of English as a foreign language", Learning Testing, 5, pp.100~114 (1988)
- Zuengler, J., "Encouraging learners' conversational participation : The effect of content knowledge", Language Learning, 43, pp.403~432 (1993)