본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어와 한국어의 수동구문과 어휘부에서의 행위성

A Study on the Agentivity of Passive Constructions and Lexicons in English and Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare passive constructions and semantic minimal pairs of verbs by showing how the semantic parameter of agentivity contributes to the use of the two kinds of English and Korean passives and that of the verbs among the semantic minimal pairs. It is shown that the agentivity nicely accounts for the use of lexical vs. phrasal passives in Korean and be-passive vs. get-passive in English. It is also claimed that in terms of agentivity there is a parallelism between lexical passives in Korean and get-passives in English, and also between phrasal passives in Korean and be-passives in English. It is argued that the use of verbs among the semantic minimal pairs is partly affected by the inherent agentivity of the verbs. The agentivity hierarchies of two Korean verbs ‘gyendi-da’ and ‘cham-da’ and the corresponding English verbs ‘bear’, ‘endure’, ‘stand’ are postulated for both English and Korean. It is claimed that despite the synonymy of the verbs the parameter of agentivity plays very important role in explaining the complementary use of the verbs among the minimal pairs, which is chiefly based on the agentivity hierarchies.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김성화, "동사유의어 연구(6) 참다", 견디다., 1995, pp.31(1), 19~47
  2. 김성화, "우리말 동사 유의어 의미 연구" (2004), 한신문화사
  3. 백미현, "한국어 부정사 ‘안’과 ‘못’ 연구", 20(2), pp.63~83 (2004)
  4. 송경안, "독일어, 영어, 한국어 수동구문의 통계적 비교연구", 6, pp.96~121 (1996)
  5. "국어이계접미사의 타동화 기능연구" (1993)
  6. 이영옥, "한국어와 영어간 구조의 차이에 따른 번역의 문제 - 수동구문을 중심으로", 1(2), pp.47~76 (2000)
  7. 국립국어연구원, "인터넷 21세기 세종계획 말뭉치 자료" (2005)
  8. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  9. Chancellor, "Masters and Scholars of Oxford University", 2 (1997)
  10. Curme,G, "Syntax" (1931), Heath
  11. Downing, "A University Course in English Grammar" (1992), Prentice Hall
  12. Givn, T, "Functionalism and Grammar" (1995), John Benjamins Publishing Co
  13. Goh,G, "Pragmatics of the English Tough Construction", 30, pp.219~230 (2000)
  14. Hong, "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean" (1992), Stanford University
  15. Jesperson,O, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1949), Allen & Urwin
  16. Kearns,K, "Semantics" (2000), MacMillan
  17. "The Grammar of Doing and Undoing", pp.331~343 (1984)
  18. In Shibatani, "A Typology of Voice Systems", pp.25~83 (1988), John Benjamins Publishing Co
  19. "Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society 7", pp.149~162 (1972)
  20. Lee, "The Semantic Approach to Agentivity Linguistic Journal of Korea 15", pp.409~437 (1990)
  21. Lee, "The Meanings of Two Passives in Korean"
  22. Lemmens,M, "Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity" (1998), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  23. Lindvall, A, "Transitivity in Discourse: A Comparison of Greek" (1998), Lund University Press
  24. "Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English" (2003)
  25. Palmer,F, "The English Verb" (1974), Longman
  26. Pustejovsky, J, "The Generative Lexicon Theory." (1995), MIT Press
  27. Schlesinger, "The Experiencer as an Agent Journal of Memory and Language 31", pp.315~335 (1992)
  28. Yang, H, "Agentivity and Nonstativity in English", 33(4), pp.671~685 (1997)
  29. Ziegeler, D., "Agentivity and the History of the English Progressive", 97(1), pp.51~101 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)