본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

만 10개월 영아들의 언어적 단서를 활용한 타인의 목표 행동 이해

Ten-month-olds’ ability to use verbal information when understanding others’ goal-directed actions

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 만 10개월 영아들이 상대방의 목표 행동 이해에 언어적 단서를 활용할 수 있는 지를 기대위반 패러다임을 통해 알아보았다. 만 10개월 영아들은 친숙화 시행에서 행위자가 무의미 단어가 포함된 문장(“모디가 있네!”)을 두 번 발화한 후 무대 위 두 물체 중 하나의 물체를 잡는 동작을 네 시행(짧은 친숙화 조건)또는 여섯 시행(긴 친숙화 조건)동안 관찰하였다. 검사 전 진열 시행에서는 두 물체의 위치를 바꾼 정지 장면이 제시되었다. 검사 시행에서 영아들은 행위자가 새로운 무의미 단어가 있는 문장(“파푸가 있네!”)을 두 번 발화한 뒤 친숙화 시행 때 잡았던 물체(기존 목표 사건) 또는 한 번도 잡지 않았던 물체(새 목표 사건)를 잡는 동작을 관찰하였다. 검사 시행의 응시시간 분석 결과 짧은 친숙화 조건의 만 10개월 영아들은 기존 목표 사건을 새 목표 사건보다 더 오랫동안 응시한 반면, 긴 친숙화 조건의 영아들은 기존 목표 사건과 새 목표 사건을 비슷하게 바라보았다. 본 연구 결과는 목표 행동 이해에 있어서 언어정보를 활용하는 능력이 만 10개월 전후에 발달함을 보여주면서, 언어발달과 사회 인지 발달과의 관련성에 대해서 함의점을 제공한다.

Abstract

In the current research we used the violation-of-expectation paradigm to examine whether 10-month-olds use linguistic cues when understanding others’ goals. During four (short-familiarization condition) or six (long-familiarization condition) familiarization trials, 10-month-olds heard a female agent saying “Here’s a modi!” twice and saw her grasping one of two objects. The locations of the two objects were switched during the pre-display trial. During test trials, infants heard a different linguistic cue (“Here’s a papu!”), and saw the actor reach for either the same object as before (the old-goal event) or the other object (the new-goal event). Ten-month-olds looked longer at the new-goal event than at the old-goal event in the short-familiarization condition, whereas they looked about equally at the two events in the long-familiarization condition. These results demonstrate 10-month-olds’ understanding that an agent’s novel verbal information may signal a change in her upcoming actions.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Baillargeon, R., "do infants learn about the physical world?", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, pp.133~140 (1994)
  2. Balaban, M. T., "Do words facilitate categorization in 9-month-old infants?", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, pp.3~26 (1997)
  3. Buresh, J. S., "Infants track action goals within and across agents", Cognition, 104, pp.287~314 (2007)
  4. Cohen, R. L., "Perspectives on learning and memory" (1985), Erlbaum
  5. Cooper, E. H., "The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning", Psychological Bulletin, 68, pp.221~234 (1967)
  6. Dewar, K., "Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?", Developmental Psychology, 43, pp.1227~1238 (2007)
  7. Graham, S. A., "Nineteen-month olds’ understanding of the conventionality of object labels versus desires", Infancy, 9(3), pp.341~350 (2006)
  8. Guajardo, J. J., "Is agency skin-deep? Surface attributes influence infants' sensitivity to goal-directed action", Infancy, 6, pp.361~384 (2004)
  9. Henderson A. M. E., "Nine-month old infants generalize object labels, but not object preferences across individuals", Developmental Science, 15, pp.641~652 (2012)
  10. Jin, K., "The role of verbal information in reasoning about others:actions in infancy", ~
  11. Jovanovic, B., "The role of effects for infants’ perception of action goals", Psychologia, 50(4), pp.273~290 (2007)
  12. Kim, E. Y., "Six-month olds actively predict others’ goal-directed actions", Cognitive Development, 33, pp.1~13 (2015)
  13. Martin, A., "Understanding the abstract role of speech in communication at 12 months", Cognition, 123, pp.50~60 (2012)
  14. Liittschwager, J. C., "Sixteen-and 24-month-olds’ use of mutual exclusivity as a default assumption in secondlabel learning", Developmental Psychology, 30, pp.955~968 (1994)
  15. Luo, Y., "Do 10-month-old infants understand others’ false beliefs?", Cognition, 121, pp.289~298 (2011)
  16. Luo, Y., "Can a selfpropelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants", Psychological Science, 16, pp.601~608 (2005)
  17. Phillips, A. T., "Infants’ ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action", Cognition, 85, pp.53~78 (2002)
  18. Song, H., "Can infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action?", Cognition, 98(45), pp.B45~B55 (2005)
  19. Song, H., "Can 9.5-month-old infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action on objects?", Acta Psychologica, 124, pp.79~105 (2007)
  20. Song, H. -j., "The development of infants' use of novel verbal information when reasoning about others' actions", PLoS ONE, 9(3), pp.e92387~ (2014)
  21. Spaepen, E. U., "Will any doll do? Twelve-month-olds’ reasoning about goal objects", Cognitive Psychology, 54, pp.133~154 (2007)
  22. Woodward, A. L., "Infants selectively encode the goal object of an agent’s reach", Cognition, 69, pp.1~34 (1998)
  23. Wynn, K., "Addition and subtraction by human infants", Nature, 358, pp.749~750 (1992)
  24. Xu, F., "The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy", Cognition, 85(3), pp.223~250 (2002)
  25. Xu, F., "Labeling guides object individuation in 12-month-old infants", Psychological Science, 16, pp.372~377 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)