본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Corpus-based Comparison of the Use of English Resultative Constructions between Chinese English Learners and Native English Speakers

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study looks into the use of English resultative construction through corpora, including COCA, BNC, and WECCL2.0. Its focus is on the similarities and differences in the use of English resultative construction between Chinese English Learners (CEL) and Native English Speakers (NES). Parameters for evaluation have been set as follows: the animacy of the agent, the aspectuality of the event-argument, and the semantic constraints on the resultative complement. The results show that the agent exerting the force on the patient is mostly animate. In contrast to NES, CEL more frequently use the passive voice with an implied agent. The verbs used by CEL in English resultative construction are sparse. In addition, CEL tend to use fixed phrases and simple constructions and they have acquired basic knowledge about the aspectuality of verbs and boundness of the PP/AP complement of English resultative constructions. (142 words)

Abstract

The present study looks into the use of English resultative construction through corpora, including COCA, BNC, and WECCL2.0. Its focus is on the similarities and differences in the use of English resultative construction between Chinese English Learners (CEL) and Native English Speakers (NES). Parameters for evaluation have been set as follows: the animacy of the agent, the aspectuality of the event-argument, and the semantic constraints on the resultative complement. The results show that the agent exerting the force on the patient is mostly animate. In contrast to NES, CEL more frequently use the passive voice with an implied agent. The verbs used by CEL in English resultative construction are sparse. In addition, CEL tend to use fixed phrases and simple constructions and they have acquired basic knowledge about the aspectuality of verbs and boundness of the PP/AP complement of English resultative constructions. (142 words)

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Boas, H. C., "A constructional approach to resultatives" (2003), CSLI Publications
  2. Croft, W., "Cognitive linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  3. Diessel, H., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics", pp.296~321 (2015), Mouton de Gruyter
  4. Divjak, D., "Cognitive linguistics : Looking back, looking forward", Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), pp.447~463 (2016)
  5. Glynn, D., "Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy" (2014), John Benjamins
  6. Goldberg, A. E., "A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  7. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  8. Green, G., "Some observations on the syntax and semantics of instrumental verbs", Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 8, pp.83~97 (1972)
  9. Halliday, M. A. K., "Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2", Journal of Linguistics, 3(3), pp.37~81 (1967)
  10. Hoekstra, T., "Small clause results", Lingua, 74(2-3), pp.101~139 (1988)
  11. Hunston, S., "Pattern grammar: A corpus‐driven approach to the lexical grammar of English" (2000), Benjamins
  12. Janda, L., "Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn" (2013), De Gruyter Mouton
  13. Kay, P., "Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction", Language, 75, pp.1~33 (1999)
  14. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of cognitive grammar (volume 1): Theoretical prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
  15. Levin, B., "English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  16. Levin, B., "Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure", pp.21~38 (2010), Oxford University Press
  17. Newman, J., "Give: A cognitive linguistic study" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  18. Quirk, R., "A grammar of contemporary English" (1972), Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd
  19. Shi, C., "The study on the argument structure and valence of resultative construction", doctor, pp.2003
  20. Shu, D. F., "The latest progress and development trend of foreign cognitive linguistics in the past 10 years", Foreign Language Studies, 1, pp.36~44 (2012)
  21. Stefanowitsch, A., "Collostructions : Investigating the interaction of words and constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp.209~244 (2003)
  22. Talmy, L., "Toward a cognitive semantics (volume 1): Concept structuring systems" (2000), MIT Press
  23. Wechsler, S., "An analysis of English resultatives under the event-argument homomorphism model of telicity", Proceedings of the 3thd Workshop on Text Structure, pp.13~15 (2001), University of Texas
  24. Xiong, Z., "The causative structures in modern Chinese" (2004), The Publishing House of An Hui University
  25. Xiong, Z., "Causer selection in resultative construction", The Journal of An Hui Normal University, 4, pp.471~476 (2004)
  26. Zhou, H., "Research on the causal category in modern Chinese", pp.2004
  27. Zhou, L., "A cognitive grammar approach to English resultative construction", doctor, pp.2021
  28. Zhou, Longying, "A Corpus-based Cognitive Grammar Analysis of English Resultative Construction", 새한영어영문학, 63(3), pp.211~231 (2021), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)