본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자본주의의 작동원리: 해롤드 핀터의 『귀향』

The Mechanism of Capitalism: Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article examines the mechanism of capitalism in Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming in light of sociocultural histories and capitalism. Capitalism has adapted successfully to shocks of every kind, to world wars and a political revolution such as the second-wave feminism. The crisis, instead of collapsing its system, promote creative destruction through which political systems are reorganized. The impaired Max’s family model in The Homecoming presents a crisis of British capitalism in the 1960s. As Britain’s economic weakness emerged in the aftermath of the postwar boom, Max who fought in the world wars is now in the position of the manager of his family without his wife, Jessie. The governor of crisis of British capitalism has been Labour, which effects in disorganizing working-class responses to the crisis itself. The obvious example of the conflict between Max and his family members is seen in money. In short, Max and his family members are castrated not because of morality but because of money in Max’s order. This order is capitalism that is just avatar of patriarchy. The tradition such as patriarchy could be ruined through political upheavals, the 1960’s second-wave feminism. Ruth representing feminists rejects the identification of women’s unpaid domestic labour as the pillar of capitalist accumulation, which is clearly manifested in her not responding to her husband in his patriarchism. Futhermore, Ruth effectively destroys Max’s order on the bases of her sexuality. In the sexual relationship depicted among Ruth, Lenny, and Joey, Teddy’s patriarchal order is completely destroyed and Ruth gains a queen- like power over Max’s family. Nevertheless, since it is capitalism that creates the conditions for the rise of the second-wave feminism, the second-wave feminist movement represented by her is just a resistance within capitalism attempting to return to power in the 1960s. And this humanized and democratic capitalism is Keynesianism.

Abstract

This article examines the mechanism of capitalism in Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming in light of sociocultural histories and capitalism. Capitalism has adapted successfully to shocks of every kind, to world wars and a political revolution such as the second-wave feminism. The crisis, instead of collapsing its system, promote creative destruction through which political systems are reorganized. The impaired Max’s family model in The Homecoming presents a crisis of British capitalism in the 1960s. As Britain’s economic weakness emerged in the aftermath of the postwar boom, Max who fought in the world wars is now in the position of the manager of his family without his wife, Jessie. The governor of crisis of British capitalism has been Labour, which effects in disorganizing working-class responses to the crisis itself. The obvious example of the conflict between Max and his family members is seen in money. In short, Max and his family members are castrated not because of morality but because of money in Max’s order. This order is capitalism that is just avatar of patriarchy. The tradition such as patriarchy could be ruined through political upheavals, the 1960’s second-wave feminism. Ruth representing feminists rejects the identification of women’s unpaid domestic labour as the pillar of capitalist accumulation, which is clearly manifested in her not responding to her husband in his patriarchism. Futhermore, Ruth effectively destroys Max’s order on the bases of her sexuality. In the sexual relationship depicted among Ruth, Lenny, and Joey, Teddy’s patriarchal order is completely destroyed and Ruth gains a queen- like power over Max’s family. Nevertheless, since it is capitalism that creates the conditions for the rise of the second-wave feminism, the second-wave feminist movement represented by her is just a resistance within capitalism attempting to return to power in the 1960s. And this humanized and democratic capitalism is Keynesianism.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Aragay, Mireia, "Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter", pp.246~259 (2001), Cambridge UP
  2. Aragay, Mireia, "Various Voices: Prose, Property, Politics, 1948-1998", pp.72~88 (1998), Grove
  3. Cahn, Victor L, "Gender and Power in the Plays of Harold Pinter" (1994), MacMillan
  4. Charney, Maurice, "Pinter’s Fractured Discourse in The Homecoming", Contains, 21(2), pp.241~255 (2012)
  5. 클리프, 토니, "영국 노동당의 역사" (2008), 책갈피
  6. Garner, Kesha, "I Laughed until I Cried: The Tragicomedy of Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming", MA, pp.2012
  7. Gussow, Mel, "Conversations with Pinter" (1994), Nick Hern
  8. Hall, Ann C, ""A Kind of Alaska" : Woman in the Plays of O’Neill, Pinter, and Shepard" (1993), Southern Illinois UP
  9. 홀, 스튜어트, "대처리즘의 문화정치" (2007), 한나래
  10. Kaletsky, Annatole, "Capitalism 4.0 The Birth of a New Economy in the Aftermath of Crisis" (2010), Public Affairs
  11. Marwick, Arthur, "British Society since 1945" (1990), Penguin
  12. MK, Rukhaya, "Harold Pinter’s Homecoming: The Return to Roots", The Criterion An International Journal in English, 4(3), pp.1~3 (2013)
  13. 미즈, 마리아, "가부장제와 자본주의" (2014), 갈무리
  14. Nicholson, Linda J, "The Second Wave : A Reader in Feminist Theory" (1997), Routledge
  15. Pinter, Harold, "The Collection and The Lover" (1963), H. Pinter
  16. Pinter, Harold, "The Essential Pinter", pp.180~256 (2006), Grove
  17. Pinter, Harold, "Moonlight" (1993), Grove
  18. Pinter, Harold, "Party Time and The New World Order" (1993), Grove
  19. Prentice, Penelope, "The Pinter Ethic" (2000), Garland
  20. Quigley, Austin, "The Pinter Problem" (1975), Princeton UP
  21. Žižek, Slavoj, "The Parallax View" (2009), MIT P
  22. Žižek, Slavoj, "Tarring with the Negative : Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology" (1993), Duke UP
  23. Žižek, Slavoj, "The Ticklish Subject : The Absent Centre of Political Ontology" (2008), Verso

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)