본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어와 한국어 장소표현 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on the Locative Expressions in English and Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper investigates the comparative aspects of locative expressions in English and Korean. It focuses on the locative prepositional phrases in English and the locative noun phrases with postpositions in Korean. The first aspect has to do with the distinction between complements and adjuncts in English and Korean locative expressions. It is argued that the locative expressions in English may be on a gradient scale, but the distinction will be valid and relatively stable. On the other hand, the theoretical distinction in Korean locative expressions is not so well established compared to English counterparts. The second aspect relates to the realizations of locative expressions for stative or dynamic situations. Some prepositions in English inherently express the dynamic situations, while some other prepositions can express both stative and dynamic situations. The postpositions in Korean, however, does not reflect the specific type of situations. The third aspect relates to the achievement of goal locations for motion events. The achievement of goal locations is argued to be implied by the right choice of prepositions or postpositions in English and Korean. The fourth aspect relates to the gradience in the use of English preposition in and Korean postposition –ey. It is argued that the preposition in and the postposition –ey shows the gradience in the situation compatibility and goal feature, respectively.

Abstract

This paper investigates the comparative aspects of locative expressions in English and Korean. It focuses on the locative prepositional phrases in English and the locative noun phrases with postpositions in Korean. The first aspect has to do with the distinction between complements and adjuncts in English and Korean locative expressions. It is argued that the locative expressions in English may be on a gradient scale, but the distinction will be valid and relatively stable. On the other hand, the theoretical distinction in Korean locative expressions is not so well established compared to English counterparts. The second aspect relates to the realizations of locative expressions for stative or dynamic situations. Some prepositions in English inherently express the dynamic situations, while some other prepositions can express both stative and dynamic situations. The postpositions in Korean, however, does not reflect the specific type of situations. The third aspect relates to the achievement of goal locations for motion events. The achievement of goal locations is argued to be implied by the right choice of prepositions or postpositions in English and Korean. The fourth aspect relates to the gradience in the use of English preposition in and Korean postposition –ey. It is argued that the preposition in and the postposition –ey shows the gradience in the situation compatibility and goal feature, respectively.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Bergs, Alexander, "The Handbook of English Linguistics", pp.145~162 (2021), Wiley
  2. in Korean, "Korean Journal of Linguistics", 2013, 997~1026
  3. Dowty, David, "Modifying Adjuncts", pp.33~66 (2003), Moutin de Gruyter
  4. Feist, Michele, "On In and On: An Investigation into the Linguistic Encoding of Spatial Scenes", Ph.D., pp.2000
  5. Goddard, Cliff, "Semantic Analysis : A Practical Introduction" (2011), Oxford University Press
  6. Hwang, Hwasang, "The Semantic Function of the Locative Case Marker ‘ey’ and ‘eyse’", Korean Linguistics, 52, pp.295~321 (2011)
  7. Law, Paul, "A Unified Analysis of P-Stranding in Romance and Germanic", NELS, 28, pp.219~234 (1998)
  8. Nam, Kisim, "The Usage of Korean Postpositions: With Reference to – ey and – ro" (1993), Bakijeong
  9. No, Changhwa, "A Study on Postpositions – ey and – eyse for the Expressions of Place", Proceedings of Fall Conference of the Linguistic Association for Discourse and Cognition, pp.~71 (2016)
  10. Park, Chulwoo, "Criteria for Distinguishing Complements and Adjuncts in Korean", Journal of the Linguistic Association of Korea, 34, pp.75~111 (2002)
  11. Quirk, Randolph, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  12. Zehentner, Eva, "Revisiting Gradience in Diachronic Construction Grammar : PPs and the Complement-Adjunct Distinction in the History of English", Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 70(3), pp.301~335 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)