The Prohibition of Non-given Food: A Response to Schlingloff
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I attempt to derive an interpretation of the Pācittiya rule no. (40) of the Pātimokkha for Buddhist monks from its background narrative; I call this “the narrative interpretation.” This version is different from the version that its canonical commentary gives, which I call “the canonical interpretation.” Then, based on legal logic and textual evidence, I argue that the narrative interpretation actually reflects the original intent of the rule. I also explore another context where the rule is implicitly referred to. Finally, I observe that this rule is a rare case where the background narrative has retained the original intent of the rule, whereas the canonical commentary has lost it. Consequently, I suggest the need to reconsider Oldenberg’s theory, which views the background stories as the youngest layer in the Vinaya.
Abstract
In this paper, I attempt to derive an interpretation of the Pācittiya rule no. (40) of the Pātimokkha for Buddhist monks from its background narrative; I call this “the narrative interpretation.” This version is different from the version that its canonical commentary gives, which I call “the canonical interpretation.” Then, based on legal logic and textual evidence, I argue that the narrative interpretation actually reflects the original intent of the rule. I also explore another context where the rule is implicitly referred to. Finally, I observe that this rule is a rare case where the background narrative has retained the original intent of the rule, whereas the canonical commentary has lost it. Consequently, I suggest the need to reconsider Oldenberg’s theory, which views the background stories as the youngest layer in the Vinaya.
참고문헌 (18)
- Richard Morris, "Aṅguttara-Nikāya 6 vols" (1958), The Pali Text Society
- V. Trenckner, "Majjhima-Nikāya 3 vols" (1977), The Pali Text Society
- William Pruitt, "The Pātimokkha" (2001), The Pali Text Society
- J. Takakusu, "Samantapāsādikā: Buddhaghosa’s Commentary on the Vinaya Piṭaka 7 vols" (1966), The Pali Text Society
- Hermann Oldenberg, "Vin Vinaya Piṭaka 5 vols" (1982), The Pali Text Society
- ANĀLAYO, Bhikkhu, "A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya. 2 vols" (2011), Dharma Drum
- AONO, Michihiko, "Preliminary Research on the Dantapoṇasikkhāpada of the Vinayapiṭaka: Focusing on Methods of Food Acquisition Acceptable for Monks", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 67(1), pp.464~459 (2018)
- BODHI, Bhikkhu, "The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya" (2012), Wisdom Publications
- HORNER, I. B., "The Book of the Discipline (Vinaya Piṭaka). 6 vols" (1938), The Pali Text Society
- NAKAMURA, Hajime, "Gotama Buddha: A Biography Based on the Most Reliable Texts 2 vols" (2002), Kosei Pubishing
- ÑĀṆAMOḶI, Bhikkhu, "The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya" (2009), Wisdom Publications
- PACHOW, W., "A Comparative Study of the Prātimokṣa on the Basis of its Chinese" (2000), Motilal Banarsidass
- "Was the Buddha Obliged to Observe the Vinaya Rules? 3rd Draft" (2015)[URL]
- PREBISH, Charles S., "A Survey of Vinaya Literature" (1994), Jin Luen
- "Der Vinayavibhaṅga zum Bhikṣuprātimokṣa der Sarvāstivādins:Sanskritfragmente nebst einer Analyse der chinesischen Übersetzung. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 2" (1959)[URL]
- SCHLINGLOFF, Dieter, "Zur Interpretation des Prātimokṣasūtra", Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 113(3), pp.536~551 (1963)
- "Buddhist Monastic Code: The Pātimokkha Rules Translated & Explained. 3rd ed. 2 vols" (2018)[URL]
- "The Question of Bhikkhunī Ordination" (2019)[URL]