형사절차상 불기소처분에 대한 대응방안
The Countermeasures of the Non-indictment in the Criminal Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A victim has been growing out of a status as a marginal man by steps under the influence of the amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2007, which includes new and revised regulations which strengthen victims' position. But the current Code does not protect the right of victims thoroughly. Now it is time to examine provisions of victims protection on current Code of Criminal Procedure to inspect the right of victims on the criminal proceedings. Considering that the original purpose of legislation of Crime indictable upon a complaint was to protect the honor of the victims, however, in particular, Crime indictable upon a complaint in Sexual Violent Crime Victim is so irrational that it must be abolished. Person who request for ruling must take charge of the expenses which is stated in the current Code of Criminal Procedure, but this is inclined to deter the use of request for ruling itself. The revised Code of Criminal Procedure abolished the sustainment of public prosecution of a lawyer and introduced that of a prosecutor. In fact, such a change can be seen as measures to extend the right of the prosecution by granting a prosecutor the right to sustainment of public prosecution as well as the right to take a hand in investigation. Under the current Code of Criminal Procedure, it is impossible for a complainant to apply for constitutional complaint after passing request for ruling. This is the reason why there actually exists no way for a complainant to deny ruling of dismissal of Court for request for ruling. It can be considered as quite a irrational measure. An amendment should be made considering that our regulation contains both of the public characteristic as a control regime against non-indictment and the private characteristic as a relief for the interests of the victim.
Abstract
A victim has been growing out of a status as a marginal man by steps under the influence of the amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2007, which includes new and revised regulations which strengthen victims' position. But the current Code does not protect the right of victims thoroughly. Now it is time to examine provisions of victims protection on current Code of Criminal Procedure to inspect the right of victims on the criminal proceedings. Considering that the original purpose of legislation of Crime indictable upon a complaint was to protect the honor of the victims, however, in particular, Crime indictable upon a complaint in Sexual Violent Crime Victim is so irrational that it must be abolished. Person who request for ruling must take charge of the expenses which is stated in the current Code of Criminal Procedure, but this is inclined to deter the use of request for ruling itself. The revised Code of Criminal Procedure abolished the sustainment of public prosecution of a lawyer and introduced that of a prosecutor. In fact, such a change can be seen as measures to extend the right of the prosecution by granting a prosecutor the right to sustainment of public prosecution as well as the right to take a hand in investigation. Under the current Code of Criminal Procedure, it is impossible for a complainant to apply for constitutional complaint after passing request for ruling. This is the reason why there actually exists no way for a complainant to deny ruling of dismissal of Court for request for ruling. It can be considered as quite a irrational measure. An amendment should be made considering that our regulation contains both of the public characteristic as a control regime against non-indictment and the private characteristic as a relief for the interests of the victim.
참고문헌 (35)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2002)
- 대검찰청, "검찰연감" (2008)
- 법무부, "개정 형사소송법" (2007)
- 법원행정처, "사법연감" (2008)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 백서(상) 사법 선진화를 위한 개혁" (2006)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 백서(하) 사법 선진화를 위한 개혁" (2006)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
- 신동운, "형사소송법제정자료집" (1990), 한국형사정책연구원
- 신동운, "효당 엄상섭 형사소송법논집" (2006), 서울대학교 출판부
- 권순민, "공판절차에서의 피해자보호 방안에 대한 검토 -2007년 개정 형사소송법률을 중심으로-", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.373~397 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김봉수, "새로운 형사재판에서 피해자의 권리보호", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.277~298 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 김재민, "헌법상 가본권 규정에 대한 피해자학적 고찰(1)", 경찰법연구, (3) (2005), 한국경찰법학회
- 김재민, "헌법상 기본권 규정에 대한 피해자학적 고찰(2)", 경찰법연구, (4) (2006), 한국경찰법학회
- 김태명, "재정신청제도의 의의와 범위의 확대", 형사법연구, (21), pp.333~364 (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 김태명, "재판상 준기소절차의 활성화 방안", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.353~382 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 류전철, "개정 형사소송법상 재정신청제도의 성격과 문제점", 영남법학 (2008), 영남대학교법학연구소
- 문준영, "검찰제도의 연혁과 현대적 의미", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.669~698 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 문채규, "검사의 부당한 불기소처분에 대한 법적 통제와 기소편의주의의 미래", 안암법학 (1997), 안암법학회
- 박기석, "개정 형사소송법의 재정신청제도", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.197~230 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박미숙, "개정 형사소송법상 재정신청제도", 형사정책연구소식, (102) (2007)
- 서보학, "검찰 개혁, 대안은 무엇인가?,검찰 이대로 좋은가", 2009년 검찰개혁 연속 기획 토론회 자료집, ~ (2009)
- 신동운, "과거청산과 한국의 검찰의 장래", 동아법학, (21) (1996), 동아대학교 법학연구소
- 신동운, "제정형사소송법의 성립경위", 형사법연구, (22), pp.159~221 (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 심재무, "검사의 불기소처분에 대한 불복제도 개선방안", 비교형사법연구, 5(1), pp.12~308 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 윤영철, "검사의 기소재량권에 대한 통제제도의 현황과 사전적·민주적 통제방안에 관한 소고", 법학논고, (30), pp.315~352 (2009), 법학연구원
- 이승호, "형사절차상 피해자진술권의 확보방안에 관한 연구", 한국피해자학회 2008년 추계학술대회 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 이 완 규, "개정 형사소송법의 쟁점과 방향", 저스티스, (100), pp.127~161 (2007), 한국법학원
- 이호중, "형사절차와 인권-사법제도개혁추진위원회의 형사소송법 개정안을 중심으로-", 한양법학, 19 (2006), 한양법학회
- 장규원, "범죄피해자와 형사절차참여에 관한 고찰", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.87~104 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 정 웅 석, "개정 형사소송법의 평가와 향후과제", 저스티스, (101), pp.205~235 (2007), 한국법학원
- 정태호, "인권보장제도로서의 헌법소원의 개념과 실제", 헌법학연구, 14(2), pp.1~44 (2008), 한국헌법학회
- 조 국, "'강조되어야 할 예외’로서의 재정신청제도", 형사판례연구, (8) (2000), 한국형사판례연구회
- 조기영, "재정신청절차의 해석론적 쟁점", 형사법연구, 20(1), pp.137~165 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- Karmen, Andrew, "Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology" (2009)
- Kelly, Deborah P., "Victims", Wayne Law Review, 34 (1987)