박완서 소설의 상호텍스트성 연구 -장편소설을 중심으로
A study on intertextuality in Park, Wan-Seo's novels -focusing on novels
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As we saw through his novels until now, we knew that the texts of Park's novels were placed in giving effects each other. Autobiographic novels, popular novels and feminism novels have relations of intertextuality; that is to say, Framework of each textual situation and first experience, systems of storyline and unified structure, and the change of perception and pulled subjectivity in the aspects of discourse. The textuality that appears in an autobiographic novel is placed in the close relationships with elder brother's death. It means that the repetition by some transformation and difference through brother's death works at least as trauma in his novel - and also that the desperate situation during the war was set up to fixed frame. Especially transforming information of surrounding that death shows a fact that the writer's strategy which includes text product and acceptance is put in each process and the meaningful relationship of realizing textuality. In popular novels, the specific cases or behaviors such as sexual relationship, marriage and pregnance are collected by the network of case and effect. A series of cases in inner-form is organized by the transformation and absorption. At this moment, the main case is not only to lead a dynamic story but also to become a factor of revealing fake consciousness. Any case else which is drawing, delaying and isolating the case acts the accusation of social condition in desire as the concrete strategy about writer's discourse. Feminism novels are focused on not only getting out of patriarchal systemic home and androcentric thoughts but (also) daring self-support. The relationship with a mother-in-law, trouble with a husband and a suppression and so on, which are repeated many times by transformation and difference. These aspects are also unfold by author's plan to achieve intended a target in a process lost individuality, contradiction cognition, force of will of execution, previous of trial. Like this, looked into the textuality in implication of Park wan-seo's novels. We could know a fact that the nework in cause and effect of text which is repeated by diverergence and transformation was caused ultimately from writer's strategy to share the story with readers. As a reslut, it is concluded that text is a one process and a life having meanigful relation at the same time.
Abstract
As we saw through his novels until now, we knew that the texts of Park's novels were placed in giving effects each other. Autobiographic novels, popular novels and feminism novels have relations of intertextuality; that is to say, Framework of each textual situation and first experience, systems of storyline and unified structure, and the change of perception and pulled subjectivity in the aspects of discourse. The textuality that appears in an autobiographic novel is placed in the close relationships with elder brother's death. It means that the repetition by some transformation and difference through brother's death works at least as trauma in his novel - and also that the desperate situation during the war was set up to fixed frame. Especially transforming information of surrounding that death shows a fact that the writer's strategy which includes text product and acceptance is put in each process and the meaningful relationship of realizing textuality. In popular novels, the specific cases or behaviors such as sexual relationship, marriage and pregnance are collected by the network of case and effect. A series of cases in inner-form is organized by the transformation and absorption. At this moment, the main case is not only to lead a dynamic story but also to become a factor of revealing fake consciousness. Any case else which is drawing, delaying and isolating the case acts the accusation of social condition in desire as the concrete strategy about writer's discourse. Feminism novels are focused on not only getting out of patriarchal systemic home and androcentric thoughts but (also) daring self-support. The relationship with a mother-in-law, trouble with a husband and a suppression and so on, which are repeated many times by transformation and difference. These aspects are also unfold by author's plan to achieve intended a target in a process lost individuality, contradiction cognition, force of will of execution, previous of trial. Like this, looked into the textuality in implication of Park wan-seo's novels. We could know a fact that the nework in cause and effect of text which is repeated by diverergence and transformation was caused ultimately from writer's strategy to share the story with readers. As a reslut, it is concluded that text is a one process and a life having meanigful relation at the same time.
참고문헌 (37)
- 박완서, "그 많던 싱아는 누가 다 먹었을까" (1992), 웅진출판
- 박완서, "그 산이 정말 거기 있었을까" (1992), 웅진출판
- 박완서, "나목" (1995), 세계사
- 박완서, "목마른 계절" (1995), 세계사
- 박완서, "그해 겨울은 따뜻했네" (1994), 세계사
- 박완서, "도시의 흉년" (1994), 세계사
- 박완서, "오만과 몽상" (1994), 세계사
- 박완서, "휘청거리는 오후" (1994), 세계사
- 박완서, "그대 아직도 꿈꾸고 있는가" (1999), 세계사
- 박완서, "살아 있는 날의 시작" (1993), 세계사
- 박완서, "서 있는 여자" (1995), 세계사
- 고은미, "여성소설의 어제와 오늘, In 여성문학의 이해", pp.267~ (2007), 태학사
- 김도남, "상호텍스트성과 텍스트 이해 교육" (2003), 도서출판 박이정
- 김창남, "대중문화의 이해", pp.39~41 (1998), 한울아카데미
- 대중문학연구회, "대중문학이란 무엇인가", pp.32~33 (1995), 평민사
- 박성천, "박완서 대중소설의 서사성 연구", 한국문예창작, 10(1), pp.61~89 (2011), 한국문예창작학회
- 방민호, "불결함에 맞서는 희생제의의 전통성, In 오만과 몽상 해설", pp.449~ (1994), 세계사
- 손윤권, "박완서 자전소설 연구 : 상호텍스트 안에서 담화가 변모하는 과정을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2004
- 신철하, "이야기와 욕망, In 박완서 문학 길찾기", pp.252~ (2000), 세계사
- 어도선, "라깡과 문학비평, In 라깡의 재탄생" (2002), 창작과비평사
- 이경호, "박완서 문학 길찾기" (2000), 세계사
- 이석규, "텍스트성, In 텍스트 분석의 실제", pp.54~55 (2003), 도서출판 역락
- 이재선, "현대한국소설사", pp.18~19 (1991), 민음사
- 이정희, "오정희·박완서 소설의 근대성과 젠더(Gender)의식 비교 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 정덕준, "한국의 대중문학", pp.18~ (2001), 도서출판 소화
- 천이두, "대중문학의 성격과 기능, In 대중문학이란 무엇인가", pp.32~33 (1995), 평민사
- 허재영, "텍스트 분석과 텍스트 언어학의 전망, In 텍스트 분석의 실제", pp.91~97 (2003), 도서출판 역락
- 한용환, "소설학 사전", pp.376~377 (1999), 문예출판사
- 다게무라 가즈코, "페미니즘", pp.139~ (2000), 한국문화사
- 리몬 캐넌, "소설의 시학", pp.32~ (1985), 문학과지성사
- 스티븐 코핸, "임병권․이호 역 이야기하기의 이론-소설과 영화의문화 기호학" (1996), 한나래
- 시모어 채트먼, "이야기와 담론", pp.69~72 (1991), 고려원
- 장 라플랑슈, "정신분석사전", pp.147~148 (2005), 열린책들
- 줄리아 크리스테바, "세미오티케-기호분석론", pp.69~ (2005), 동문선
- 지그문트 프로이트, "정신분석 강의", pp.374~375 (2003), 열린책들
- 패트릭 오닐, "담화의 허구", pp.122~125 (2004), 예림기획
- 필립 르죈, "자서전의 규약" (1998), 문학과지성사
