구상 시의 가톨리시즘 담론 연구
A Study of on the Catholicism discourse in Gusang's poems
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Catholicism of Gusang aims at ‘religious ideology’ rather than ‘artistic aesthetics’. His discourse of Catholicism is developed by allusions of the Bible. He shows the world recognition as binary oppositions. Namely, these examples are ‘abstract indicators’ such as ‘love’, ‘justice’ and ‘eternity’ and ‘humble reality’ with ‘sin’, ‘greed’ and ‘injustice’. The poet extracts the concept of ‘shame’ from this, here ‘shame’ means ‘conscience.’Gusang discourses the concept because of the corruption of reality. The raven in his series of poetry, The Raven 「 」 represents the voice of the prophet who criticizes Greed and injustice of fetishism of South Korea since the 1970s. The raven’s role is to criticize the contemporary reality, as well as the poet himself. ‘The cross’ shows existential anguish dramatically. The cross is the point of contact intersecting horizontality and verticality, heaven and earth. Gusang understands the reality of this land and alleges ‘volitional subject’ “I also must go alone”. These subject stems from ‘ethical subject’. The poet speaks highly of volitional subject and the road means comprehending “the reality of the Word". Therefore, “I, smaller than a grain of sand”, will experience and testify the ‘reality’ of the world, The act of recognizing the reality means experiencing the presence of God,The poet speaks more highly of ‘ethical subject’ more than ‘lyrical subject’ and tries to match Poetry and life. Thus, he tried to reach the holistic existence. His poetry Pursued the union of ‘poetic ego’ and ‘existential ego’ and put more values on salvation of the existence than artistic salvation, thus, left big footsteps to heighten the ideology of modern korean poetry.
Abstract
Catholicism of Gusang aims at ‘religious ideology’ rather than ‘artistic aesthetics’. His discourse of Catholicism is developed by allusions of the Bible. He shows the world recognition as binary oppositions. Namely, these examples are ‘abstract indicators’ such as ‘love’, ‘justice’ and ‘eternity’ and ‘humble reality’ with ‘sin’, ‘greed’ and ‘injustice’. The poet extracts the concept of ‘shame’ from this, here ‘shame’ means ‘conscience.’Gusang discourses the concept because of the corruption of reality. The raven in his series of poetry, The Raven 「 」 represents the voice of the prophet who criticizes Greed and injustice of fetishism of South Korea since the 1970s. The raven’s role is to criticize the contemporary reality, as well as the poet himself. ‘The cross’ shows existential anguish dramatically. The cross is the point of contact intersecting horizontality and verticality, heaven and earth. Gusang understands the reality of this land and alleges ‘volitional subject’ “I also must go alone”. These subject stems from ‘ethical subject’. The poet speaks highly of volitional subject and the road means comprehending “the reality of the Word". Therefore, “I, smaller than a grain of sand”, will experience and testify the ‘reality’ of the world, The act of recognizing the reality means experiencing the presence of God,The poet speaks more highly of ‘ethical subject’ more than ‘lyrical subject’ and tries to match Poetry and life. Thus, he tried to reach the holistic existence. His poetry Pursued the union of ‘poetic ego’ and ‘existential ego’ and put more values on salvation of the existence than artistic salvation, thus, left big footsteps to heighten the ideology of modern korean poetry.
참고문헌 (24)
- 구상, "모과 옹두리에도 사연이" (2002), 홍성사
- 구상, "오늘 속의 영원, 영원 속의 오늘" (2002), 홍성사
- 구상, "개똥밭" (2004), 홍성사
- 구상선생기념사업회, "구상문학논총", pp.138~ (2008), 구상선생기념사업회
- 김준오, "문학사와 장르", pp.129~ (2000), 문학과지성사
- 박철석, "한국현대시인론", pp.213~215 (1982), 학문사
- 석영중, "러시아 현대시학", pp.36~146 (1996), 민음사
- 송효섭, "설화의 기호학", pp.285~ (1999), 민음사
- 오정국, "시의 탄생, 설화의 재생", pp.101~ (2002), 청동거울
- 최재선, "한국문학주제론", pp.8~ (1997), 서강대출판부
- Tzvetan Todorov, "바흐친 : 문학사회학과 대화이론", pp.183~ (1988), 까치글방
- Bakhtin M, "Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo", pp.210~ (1979), Sovetskaia Rossiia
- Lotman Iu, "Struktura Khudozhesvennogo tekta", pp.48~ (1971), Brown University Press
- 김봉군, "시의 믿음과 삶의 합일", 현대시학, pp.52~ (1983), 현대시학사
- 김윤식, "구상론", 현대시학, pp.116~117 (1978), 현대시학사
- 김현균, "니까노르 빠라의 시에 나타난 시적 자아에 관한 연구", 스페인어문학, (28), pp.509~525 (2003), 한국스페인어문학회
- 안수환, "상황과 구원", 시와 의식, (56) (1980), 시와의식사
- 안수환, "구상 문학과 신의 존재", 한국문학, pp.67~ (1984)
- 윤애경, "한국 가톨릭시의 계보․1", 시와 환상, (겨울), pp.244~ (2012), 시와환상사
- 조창환, "구상 시의 전개와 문학사적 의의", 구상문학논총, pp.3~5 (2008), 구상선생기념사업회
- 하현식, "개성과 「비개성주의」", 현대시학, pp.89~103 (1983), 현대시학사
- 하현식, "인간의 실재와 형이상학적 인식", 현대시학, pp.112~ (1984), 현대시학사
- 홍신선, "초월과 물의 시학-구상의 ‘그리스도 폴의 강’을 읽고", 시문학, pp.17~ (1985), 시문학사
- Anthony Teague, "구상의 시세계-참됨과 헌신, In Royal Asiatic Society", pp.56~ (1989)
