본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

계급적 공감과 욕망의 기표에 관한 고찰 —김애란 소설을 중심으로

The research for hierarchical empathy and the symbols of desires —focused on Ae Ran Kim’s novels

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

Ae Ran Kim’s novels present the existence of class which is invisible inmodern society by showing the desires of subjects and the process whichthose desires are frustrated. Her literature will be effectively understoodthrough Mimetic desire(Rene Girard), Distinction(Pierre Bourdieu) andCapital concept about the classification and variation of desires which sheintensively seeks. The characters of her novels gain a foothold on the position of subjectsinside the mimetic desire which is consist of ‘subject’, ‘object andintermediary of desires’and they persistently long for ‘normal criterion’. But the characters do not exactly knows what the ‘normal criterion’is. And it is not the normal criterion which anyone can reach on average butthe criterion which needs a further. The subject feels satisfied byimitating others who seem like they can reach the ‘normal criterion’because the ‘normal criterion’is not specific. The desires for ‘normal criterion’of her novels is varied to diversecontents. The subject’s desire to rise of rank is transformed to be Seoulite, academy career capital, inheritance capital, and etc. The aspectof desires presents as a individual voice not a group one. They makediverse effort to reach the ‘normal criterion’but it is not successful. Themain reason is the limit of class which is represented as a lack ofinheritance. The subject of desires who can not reach the ‘normalcriterion’in her literature demonstrate the passive escape rather thanthey choose the way to resist the real world. It is apprehended to theexpression of resignation that the desires for the rise of rank have nochoice but to fail in the real world. In this point of view, this seeking forthe rank which is included in neo-liberalism society is a fundamentalcriticism about neo-liberalism which asserts the equality of opportunityand freedom.

Abstract

Ae Ran Kim’s novels present the existence of class which is invisible inmodern society by showing the desires of subjects and the process whichthose desires are frustrated. Her literature will be effectively understoodthrough Mimetic desire(Rene Girard), Distinction(Pierre Bourdieu) andCapital concept about the classification and variation of desires which sheintensively seeks. The characters of her novels gain a foothold on the position of subjectsinside the mimetic desire which is consist of ‘subject’, ‘object andintermediary of desires’and they persistently long for ‘normal criterion’. But the characters do not exactly knows what the ‘normal criterion’is. And it is not the normal criterion which anyone can reach on average butthe criterion which needs a further. The subject feels satisfied byimitating others who seem like they can reach the ‘normal criterion’because the ‘normal criterion’is not specific. The desires for ‘normal criterion’of her novels is varied to diversecontents. The subject’s desire to rise of rank is transformed to be Seoulite, academy career capital, inheritance capital, and etc. The aspectof desires presents as a individual voice not a group one. They makediverse effort to reach the ‘normal criterion’but it is not successful. Themain reason is the limit of class which is represented as a lack ofinheritance. The subject of desires who can not reach the ‘normalcriterion’in her literature demonstrate the passive escape rather thanthey choose the way to resist the real world. It is apprehended to theexpression of resignation that the desires for the rise of rank have nochoice but to fail in the real world. In this point of view, this seeking forthe rank which is included in neo-liberalism society is a fundamentalcriticism about neo-liberalism which asserts the equality of opportunityand freedom.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 김애란, "달려라, 아비" (2005), 창비
  2. 김애란, "침이고인다" (2007), 문학과지성사
  3. 김애란, "두근두근내인생" (2011), 창비
  4. 김애란, "비행운" (2012), 문학과지성사
  5. 최윤필, "제38회한국일보문학상수상자김애란씨인터뷰", 한국일보, ~ (2005)
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre, "구별짓기: 문화와 취향의 사회학 上, 下" (2006), 새물결출판사
  7. Girard, Ren´e, "낭만적거짓과소설적진실" (2001), 한길사
  8. 송은영, "현대도시 서울의 형성과 1960-70년대 소설의 문화지리학", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
  9. 양윤의, "소포머징크스를 깨는 일곱 가지 방식", 2007년 가을의 한국문학, 14(4), pp.482~519 (2007)
  10. 이동하, "도시 공간으로서의 서울과 소설 연구의 과제", 현대소설연구, (52), pp.9~43 (2013), 한국현대소설학회
  11. 이평전, "현대소설에 나타난 ‘일상’ 재현의 의미와 ‘주체’ 서사 연구", 한국문학이론과 비평, 11(3), pp.375~397 (2007), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  12. 한혜경, "창백한’청춘들의‘도도한’이야기 - 김애란의 소설들", 새국어생활, 19(3), pp.107~114 (2009), 국립국어원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)