2000년대 한국시의 ‘ 미성년 화자’ 연구-진은영・김민정・이민하의 시를 중심으로
A Study on the ‘The Minority Narrator’ in the Korean Poetries of the 2000’s - Focusing on the Poems of Jin Eunyoung・Kim Minjeong・Lee Minha
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The analytic target of this thesis is in the poems of Jin-Eunyoung·Kin -Minjeong·Lee? Minha. And the poets in these poetries chose ‘the child of the infancy’ as the poetic narrator, and tried to meet this world through the sensory organs of the child’s body. So the writers in their poetries show flexible free associations, the imagination which upsets the existing world and fantasies that are grotesque. The narrators in these poems expose their desires to ‘become something’ not to ‘become an adult’ in the way of murmuring to themselves. For example, ‘a girl’ changes into ‘a cat’ or it sometimes changes into “a thin writing paper” and sticks to the ceiling. Here ‘the girl’ or ‘the cat’ is the substitute of the narrator to keep his or her own system against the social demands. This substitute means escaping of the reality of the poetic subject. So fantasies are generated here. These fantasies are usually presented by the grotesque images: “the body” which is mutilated and damaged like “pieces of photos”, “wheat flakes noodles made by the mom’s and dad’s bodies”. Here we can see there is an escape of the reality of the poetic subject. It shows the extremes of both sadism and masochism related with the human body. ‘Dad cut legs’ ‘the decapitated baby’ ‘the baby cooking flesh and wheat flakes noodles’ are the good examples. Here and there we can see the wounds of the damaged bodies. And in this part the image of the eyes is very important and it draws attention. The eyes and the mirror are composed of similar terms. And it’s ironic the eyes and the mirror watch over the subject and devide and split the subject, at the same time, wake the subject up. The wounds of the mutilated body is the gap which shows ‘the reality’ beyond ‘the symbolic world’. These poets didn’t use the metaphoric way of writing to see the gap. Instead, they spread the metonymy by the discontinuous narration. In Lee? Minha’s poems we can see the unreasonable and absurd aspects in our society by the grotesque images, on the other hand, the poems of Kim? Minjeong show the collision between the corrupted world and the pure life by producing the grotesque situations. And in the poems of Jin? Eunyoung, we can feel the blank space of life in the world of violence through free associations. These poetries show ‘the poet’, ‘the poetic narrator’ and ‘the inter? subjectivity’. ‘The poetic narrator’, who is ‘the child of the infancy’ is ‘the epistemology other’ who incessantly communicates with the poet. The image of the past does perform the interpretative function, not the historical function. The narrator in these poetries is the child who is still not growing up in “The tin drum”. This is an irony and also allegory. Therefore, the aspects of confrontation in the reality are shown just as they are and they made characteristic conversation of 2000’s poetries through ‘strange and unfamiliar voices’ and by throwing away the existing poetic language.
Abstract
The analytic target of this thesis is in the poems of Jin-Eunyoung·Kin -Minjeong·Lee? Minha. And the poets in these poetries chose ‘the child of the infancy’ as the poetic narrator, and tried to meet this world through the sensory organs of the child’s body. So the writers in their poetries show flexible free associations, the imagination which upsets the existing world and fantasies that are grotesque. The narrators in these poems expose their desires to ‘become something’ not to ‘become an adult’ in the way of murmuring to themselves. For example, ‘a girl’ changes into ‘a cat’ or it sometimes changes into “a thin writing paper” and sticks to the ceiling. Here ‘the girl’ or ‘the cat’ is the substitute of the narrator to keep his or her own system against the social demands. This substitute means escaping of the reality of the poetic subject. So fantasies are generated here. These fantasies are usually presented by the grotesque images: “the body” which is mutilated and damaged like “pieces of photos”, “wheat flakes noodles made by the mom’s and dad’s bodies”. Here we can see there is an escape of the reality of the poetic subject. It shows the extremes of both sadism and masochism related with the human body. ‘Dad cut legs’ ‘the decapitated baby’ ‘the baby cooking flesh and wheat flakes noodles’ are the good examples. Here and there we can see the wounds of the damaged bodies. And in this part the image of the eyes is very important and it draws attention. The eyes and the mirror are composed of similar terms. And it’s ironic the eyes and the mirror watch over the subject and devide and split the subject, at the same time, wake the subject up. The wounds of the mutilated body is the gap which shows ‘the reality’ beyond ‘the symbolic world’. These poets didn’t use the metaphoric way of writing to see the gap. Instead, they spread the metonymy by the discontinuous narration. In Lee? Minha’s poems we can see the unreasonable and absurd aspects in our society by the grotesque images, on the other hand, the poems of Kim? Minjeong show the collision between the corrupted world and the pure life by producing the grotesque situations. And in the poems of Jin? Eunyoung, we can feel the blank space of life in the world of violence through free associations. These poetries show ‘the poet’, ‘the poetic narrator’ and ‘the inter? subjectivity’. ‘The poetic narrator’, who is ‘the child of the infancy’ is ‘the epistemology other’ who incessantly communicates with the poet. The image of the past does perform the interpretative function, not the historical function. The narrator in these poetries is the child who is still not growing up in “The tin drum”. This is an irony and also allegory. Therefore, the aspects of confrontation in the reality are shown just as they are and they made characteristic conversation of 2000’s poetries through ‘strange and unfamiliar voices’ and by throwing away the existing poetic language.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김민정, "날으는 고슴도치 아가씨" (2005), 열림원
- 이민하, "환상수족" (2005), 열림원
- 이민하, "음악처럼 스캔들처럼" (2008), 문학과지성사
- 진은영, "우리는 매일 매일" (2008), 문학과지성사
- 김상환, "라깡의 재탄생" (2003), 창작과비평사
- 김준오, "가면의 해석학" (1985), 이우출판사
- 노창수, "한국 현대시의 화자 연구" (2007), 푸른사상
- 송승환, "측위의 감각" (2010), 서정시학사
- 송효섭, "설화의 기호학" (1999), 민음사
- 이창민, "현대시와 판타지" (2008), 고려대 출판부
- 함돈균, "얼굴 없는 노래" (2009), 문학과지성사
- Barthes Roland, "이미지와 글쓰기" (1993), 세계사
- Bettelheim Bruno, "옛이야기의 매력" (1998), 시공주니어
- Fredric Jameson, "변증법적 문학이론의 전개" (1984), 창작과비평사
- Friedrich Hugo, "현대시의 구조 : 보들레르에서 20세기 중반까지" (2008), 지식을만드는 지식
- Joseph Childers, "현대 문학・문화비평 용어사전" (1999), 문학동네
- Ogilvie Bertrand, "라캉, 주체 개념의 형성" (2002), 동문선
- 고봉준, "살아 있는 시체, 또는 실재의 시학", 현대시, ~ (2010)
- 김현균, "니까노르 빠라의 시에 나타난 시적 자아에 관한 연구", 스페인어문학, (28), pp.509~525 (2003), 한국스페인어문학회
- 오형엽, "꿈속의 진혼제", 현대시, ~ (2007)
- 오형엽, "마녀적 무의식과 환상", 서정시학, (겨울) (2009)
- 최현식, "환상(성), 사전 혹은 실재를 구성하다", 현대시, ~ (2010)
- 함돈균, "2000년대 시의 니힐리즘 연구", 한국문예창작, 7(1), pp.75~101 (2008), 한국문예창작학회
