본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

敦煌本 傷寒論에 관한 硏究

The Study on the Donhwang Manuscript[敦煌本] 『Sanghallon(傷寒論)』

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

It is generally called that the Donhwang Manuscript[敦煌本] Sanghallon(傷寒論) is all the series of documents relating to the Sanghallon(傷寒論) included in one of the testaments, which was, in 1900, originally found in the Janggyeong hole[藏經洞], Makgo cave[莫高窟], Donhwang(敦煌), Gamsuk province[甘肅省]. The consecutive numbers of the Manuscript are S․202 and P․3287, the former is called the Sanghallon(傷寒論) A-Manuscript[甲本] and the latter consists of the Sanghallon(傷寒論) B-Manuscript[乙本] and the Sanghallon(傷寒論) C-Manuscript[丙本]. The Donhwang Manuscript is a type of a hurt book, but not a complete form of a book. As the research conducted, it has been proven that the Donhwang Manuscript Sanghallon(傷寒論) has the academic values as mentioned below. First, it is highly valuable to inter-related study and revise the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Second, it is one of circumstantial evidences to have various kinds of versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Third, its findings somehow wipes out arguments concerning with identifying authors of the Sanghallon(傷寒論)․Sanghanrye(傷寒例) and the Sanghallon(傷寒論)․Byeonmaekbeop(辨脈法). Fourth, it has turned out that the existing Geumgweokhamgyeong(金匱玉函經) is not a forgery, but one of imparted versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論) In conclusion, it could be acknowledged that the discovery of the Donhwang Manuscript Sanghallon(傷寒論) enables to arrange and revise the Sanghallon(傷寒論), and it has provided researchers with critical evidences about ascertaining many kinds of different versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Moreover, we can also find the great contribution of this findings which could clarify various non-proven arguments within many experts and researchers.

Abstract

It is generally called that the Donhwang Manuscript[敦煌本] Sanghallon(傷寒論) is all the series of documents relating to the Sanghallon(傷寒論) included in one of the testaments, which was, in 1900, originally found in the Janggyeong hole[藏經洞], Makgo cave[莫高窟], Donhwang(敦煌), Gamsuk province[甘肅省]. The consecutive numbers of the Manuscript are S․202 and P․3287, the former is called the Sanghallon(傷寒論) A-Manuscript[甲本] and the latter consists of the Sanghallon(傷寒論) B-Manuscript[乙本] and the Sanghallon(傷寒論) C-Manuscript[丙本]. The Donhwang Manuscript is a type of a hurt book, but not a complete form of a book. As the research conducted, it has been proven that the Donhwang Manuscript Sanghallon(傷寒論) has the academic values as mentioned below. First, it is highly valuable to inter-related study and revise the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Second, it is one of circumstantial evidences to have various kinds of versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Third, its findings somehow wipes out arguments concerning with identifying authors of the Sanghallon(傷寒論)․Sanghanrye(傷寒例) and the Sanghallon(傷寒論)․Byeonmaekbeop(辨脈法). Fourth, it has turned out that the existing Geumgweokhamgyeong(金匱玉函經) is not a forgery, but one of imparted versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論) In conclusion, it could be acknowledged that the discovery of the Donhwang Manuscript Sanghallon(傷寒論) enables to arrange and revise the Sanghallon(傷寒論), and it has provided researchers with critical evidences about ascertaining many kinds of different versions of the Sanghallon(傷寒論). Moreover, we can also find the great contribution of this findings which could clarify various non-proven arguments within many experts and researchers.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 潭眞, "試論敦煌醫學價値", 中華醫史雜誌, 22(4), pp.224~230 (1992)
  2. 范新俊, "古今敦煌醫文獻論著目錄", 上海中醫藥雜誌, (5), pp.41~43 (1995)
  3. 申尙玗, "診斷體系에關한 硏究", 대한동의병리학회지, 12(1), pp.1~18 (1998)
  4. 염용하, "관한 文獻的연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 16(1), pp.8~13 (2002)
  5. 王淑民, "敦煌吐魯番出土古本五臟論的考察", 中華醫史雜誌, 25(1), pp.46~51 (1995)
  6. 劉喜平, "敦煌古醫方的硏究槪況", 中成藥, 26(1), pp.8~9 (2004)
  7. 李應存, "敦煌醫學中古醫方的硏究與應用槪況", 甘肅中醫學院學報, 17(3), pp.64~65 (2000)
  8. 張燦玾, "仲景著作文獻硏究簡議", 中國醫藥學報, 17(3), pp.5~10 (1992)
  9. 佃會, "宋以前傷寒雜病論的流布硏究" (2001), 山東中醫藥大學博士學位論文
  10. 朱定華, "敦煌殘卷醫籍張仲景五藏論辨析", 上海中醫雜誌, (10), pp.6~9 (1985)
  11. 叢春雨, "“八法”与敦煌遺書古醫方", 上海中醫藥雜誌, (6), pp.38~41 (1997)
  12. 叢春雨, "談敦煌古醫籍的學術成就和文獻價値", 中醫文獻雜誌, (4), pp.1~3 (1997)
  13. 叢春雨, "敦煌中醫藥學及其文獻價値", 絲綢之路, (4), pp.29~30 (1996)
  14. 유진보, "돈황학이란 무엇인가", pp.52~53 (2003), 아카넷
  15. 李順保, "傷寒論版本大全", pp.16~17 (2000), 學苑出版社
  16. 錢超塵, "傷寒論文獻通考", pp.582~583 (1993), 學苑出版社
  17. 趙健雄, "貴陽", pp.266~268 (1988), 貴州人民出版社
  18. 叢春雨, "敦煌中醫藥全書", pp.29~38 (1994), 中醫古籍出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)