『千金翼方·傷寒』에 대한 硏究
A Study on the 『Qianjinyifang·Shanghan』
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구목적 : [千金翼方·傷寒]은 중요한 판본임에도 널리 소개되지 않았고, 그 연구도 활발하지 않았다. 이에 논자는 이번 연구를 통해서 [千金翼方·傷寒]의 특성, 판본들 간의 관계, [傷寒論] 전승과정에서 [千金翼方·傷寒]이 차지하는 위치와 의미를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : [千金翼方·傷寒]을 중심으로 한 논문과 [玉涵本], [宋本]을 함께 비교하는 논문 등 여러 논문을 참고하고, [千金翼方·傷寒], [唐本傷寒論校注]를 기준으로 조문 번호를 부여하여 [傷寒論]의 다른 판본과 구체적으로 비교 하였다. 연구결과 : 孫思邈은 [傷寒論]에 “以法方類證, 方證同條 比類相附”하는 변화를 가져왔다. 太陽病篇을 湯證별로 정리하고, 太陽病 篇名을 「太陽病用···湯法」으로 하였다. 痓·濕·暍을 「太陽病用桂枝湯法」 조문 앞에 두고, [玉函本]의 厥陰病과 利嘔噦病을 合하였다. “傷寒宜忌” 제목을 宜忌篇 앞에 두어 三陰三陽篇과 구분을 뚜렷이 하였다. 三陰三陽篇과 宜忌篇에 [宋本]에는 결여된 조문을 다수 보존하고 있다. 연구결론 : [千金翼方·傷寒]은 北宋 校正醫書局에 의해 보존된 주요 [傷寒論] 판본 중 하나이고, 明·淸代를 거치면서 독립 단행본이 되었다. 3C, 7C, 11C라는 800여년의 시간 축 가운데에서 [傷寒論] 전승 과정의 중간다리 역할을 하고 있다. 또한 [千金翼方·傷寒], [玉涵本], [宋本]의 三陰三陽篇과 宜忌篇 조문 비교는 세 판본이 하나의 祖本에서 출발하였으나, 이후 分岐되었고, [千金翼方·傷寒]이 [玉涵本]과 더 가까운 연관관계를 갖는다는 것을 알게 해주었다. [宋本]에서 결여된 三陰三陽篇과 宜忌篇의 조문은 오늘날 통행본인 [宋本]의 판본적 결여를 보완하는데 근거가 될 수 있다.
Abstract
Objectives : Qianjinyifang·Shanghan is an important versions of Shanghanlun, but it was never introduced widely, and studies on its were not done a lot. Thus, the author seeks to study this book in order to find its special features, its relationship with other versions of Shanghanlun, and its status in the process of the transmission of Shanghanlun. Methods : Dissertations on Qianjinyifang·Shanghan and dissertations that compare Yuhanben and Songben were studied. Sentences were numbered based on Qianjinyifang·Shanghan, Tangbenshanghanlunjiaozhu to compare with other versions of Shanghanlun. Results : Sunsimiao brought the changes of “以法方類證, 方證同條 比類相附” in Shanghanlun. It organized Taiyangbing chapters according to their decoction pattern, and made Taiyangbing chapter name as 「太陽病用···湯法」. Chì·shi·ye was placed in front of Taiyangbìngyongguizhitangfa. Jueyinbing and Liouhuibing were combined to one that were seperated in Yuhanben. Shanghanyiji titlel was put in front of Yijipian to distinguish clearly from Sanyinsanyangpian. Sanyinsanyangpian and Yijipian contains many sentences that are missing in Songben. Conclusions : Qianjinyifang·Shanghan is one of the major Shanghanluns that were saved by Jiaozhengyishuju I Northern Song Period, and it was put together as an independent book after the Ming and Qing dynasties. It plays an important role in the process of the transmission of Shanghanlun in 800 years, through 3C, 7C, and 11C. Moreover, when we compare the three books of Qianjinyifang·Shanghan, Yuhanben, and Songben’s Sanyinsanyangpian and Yijipian’s sentences, we could know that they began from a common original text, but they became branched, and Qianjinyifang·Shanghan has a closer relationship with Yuhanben. Sanyinsanyangpian and Yijipian sentences can serve to supplement what is missing in today’s Songben.
참고문헌 (20)
- Domok YY, "Wood carving Shanghan Lun in Song-Dynasty Edition" (1991), Natural Science House
- Huang F, "Brief on the Main Versions of Shanghan Lun", World Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 9(12) (2014)
- Li SB, "Jinkuiyuhanjing" (2005), Xue yuan Publishing House
- Li SB, "The contemplation of Shanghan Lun in Tang-Dynasty Edition. LinL. Shanghan Lun Banben Daquan" (2000), Xue yuan Publishing House
- Qian CC, "Brief on the Versions of Qianjinyifang", Chinese Medical Culture, 2012(3) (2012)
- Qian CC, "Shanghan Lun in Tang-Dynasty Edition" (1994), China Medical Science Press
- Sun SM, "Qian Jin Yi Fang" (1955), People's Health Publishing House
- Wang SH, "Maijing" (2010), Scientific and Technical documentation press
- Wei YY, "Structure comparison of "Treatise on Febrile Diseases" in Tang-Dynasty Edition and Song-Dynasty;Knowledge of Ancient Medical Literature", Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2001(4) (2001)
- Yamada GG, "Chinese Medicine is how did it start" (2002), Science Books
- Zhang ZJ, "Jinkuiyaoluefanglun comment.Xiaoeryaozhengzhijue comment" (2010), Chaina Renmin University House
- Cai TR, "Naming Taboo in China historical report and a role of literature review", Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition), 9(18) (2017)
- Eom HS, "A comparative research between Shanghan Lun and Shang han in Qian Jin Yi Fang", Dong-eui University, journal of Dong-eui, 29 (1998)
- 김상현, "『金匱玉函經』의 成書 배경과 학술 체계", 대한한의학원전학회지, 29(4), pp.105~125 (2016), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
- 염용하, "『金？玉函經』에 관한 문헌적 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 16(1), pp.2~13 (2002), 한의병리학회
- Park JY, "The study of Shanghan in Sun, si-miao's Qian Jin Yi Fang", Dept. of Oriental Medical History, pp.2010
- Qian CC, "Study of Bian Shang han included in Qian Jin Yi Fang (xia)", World Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 9(5) (2014)
- Xiao XR, "Specific herb medical evidence-The essence of Shanghan Lun Herb Medical Evidence", Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 43(11) (2016)
- 윤창열, "避諱의 유래와 종류, 방법에 관한 고찰", 대한한의학원전학회지, 22(2), pp.127~138 (2009), 대한한의학원전학회
- Zhu SF, "A comparative research between Jinkui Yuihanjing and Tang-Dynasty-version Shanghan Lun", master's, pp.2012