在隋唐時期的書籍中關於《素問》的引用
The Quotation from 『Somun(素問)』 to Four Books in Su(隋) and Dang(唐) Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The popular edition of 『Hwangjenaegyeong․somun(黄帝内經․素問)』 was established by Wangbing(王冰)’s revising and annexing notes in the Dang(唐) Period. He revised 『Jeonwongibon(全元起本)』 which became the edition we currently know widely. To know how 『Somun(素問)』 had been handed down from the Su(隋) Period to the Dang(唐) Period before the establishment of Wangbing(王冰) ’s edition, we reviewed the citation of 『Somun』 in the four books: 『Ohaengdaeui(五行大義)』, 『Jebyeongwonhuron(諸病源候論)』,『Sagijeong-ui(史記正義)』, and 『Oedaebiyobang(外臺秘要方)』. As a result, it has been discovered that even if the reference was written as 『Hwangjesomun(黄帝素問)』 or 『Somun(素問)』, they did not correspond with the currently established 『Somun(素問)』 in many cases. On the other hand, there were identical sentences to the current 『Somun(素問)』 among the cited parts; whereas 「Yeolron(熱論)」 and 「Jahakron(刺瘧論)」 were often cited in the medical books such as 『Jebyeongwonhuron(諸病源候論)』 and 『Oedaebiyobang(外臺秘要方)』, 「Yeolron(熱論)」 and 「Jahakron(刺瘧論)」 were often cited. Thus, we can suggest that the relevant content of 『Somun(素問)』 should be considered important in the period in question and further that the concept of disease symptom might have changed in those days.
Abstract
The popular edition of 『Hwangjenaegyeong․somun(黄帝内經․素問)』 was established by Wangbing(王冰)’s revising and annexing notes in the Dang(唐) Period. He revised 『Jeonwongibon(全元起本)』 which became the edition we currently know widely. To know how 『Somun(素問)』 had been handed down from the Su(隋) Period to the Dang(唐) Period before the establishment of Wangbing(王冰) ’s edition, we reviewed the citation of 『Somun』 in the four books: 『Ohaengdaeui(五行大義)』, 『Jebyeongwonhuron(諸病源候論)』,『Sagijeong-ui(史記正義)』, and 『Oedaebiyobang(外臺秘要方)』. As a result, it has been discovered that even if the reference was written as 『Hwangjesomun(黄帝素問)』 or 『Somun(素問)』, they did not correspond with the currently established 『Somun(素問)』 in many cases. On the other hand, there were identical sentences to the current 『Somun(素問)』 among the cited parts; whereas 「Yeolron(熱論)」 and 「Jahakron(刺瘧論)」 were often cited in the medical books such as 『Jebyeongwonhuron(諸病源候論)』 and 『Oedaebiyobang(外臺秘要方)』, 「Yeolron(熱論)」 and 「Jahakron(刺瘧論)」 were often cited. Thus, we can suggest that the relevant content of 『Somun(素問)』 should be considered important in the period in question and further that the concept of disease symptom might have changed in those days.
참고문헌 (5)
- 李茂如, "《歷代史志書目医籍匯考》" (1994), 人民衛生出版社
- 水澤利忠, "《史記正義の研究》" (1994), 汲古書院
- 小曾戶洋, "《東洋醫學善在隋唐時期的書籍中關於》", 東洋醫學研究會 (1981)
- 廖育, "《岐黃醫道》" (1991), 遼寧教育出版社
- 小曾戶洋, "《中国医学古典と日本》", pp.411~ (1996), 塙書房
