新儒學, 張橫渠의 氣一元論과 李東垣의 內傷學說
Neo-confucianism(新儒學), Zhang Heng-qu(張橫渠)’s Qi-monism(氣一元論) and Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s Theory of Internal Injury(內傷學說)
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : This paper was designed to confirm the relation between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’. Method : Through a comparative literature review, I searched for the commonality between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’, and also examined the difference in the meaning of ‘Primordial Qi(元氣)’ in Qi-monism and that Lee Dong-yuan proposed. Result & Conclusion : The central theme of Neo-confucianism, ‘Staying on the Golden Path(允執厥中)’, has a commonality with Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury that emphasized Primordial Qi, and the concepts of “Great Vacuity as Qi(太虛卽氣)”, “Two Properties Inherent in a Single Object(一物兩體)”, and “the Nature of Acquired Disposition(氣質之性)” have commonality with the concepts of “The Given from the Vacuity of Natural World(所受於天)”, Up & Down Movement(升降運動), and Yin Fire(陰火) of Primordial Qi in Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury respectively. However, the concept of Primordial Qi in the Theory of Qi-monism refers to the building blocks of all things in the universe, whereas the concept of Primordial Qi that Li Dong-yuan proposed has no meaning of component of body but driving force that maintains the phenomenon of life.
Abstract
Objective : This paper was designed to confirm the relation between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’. Method : Through a comparative literature review, I searched for the commonality between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’, and also examined the difference in the meaning of ‘Primordial Qi(元氣)’ in Qi-monism and that Lee Dong-yuan proposed. Result & Conclusion : The central theme of Neo-confucianism, ‘Staying on the Golden Path(允執厥中)’, has a commonality with Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury that emphasized Primordial Qi, and the concepts of “Great Vacuity as Qi(太虛卽氣)”, “Two Properties Inherent in a Single Object(一物兩體)”, and “the Nature of Acquired Disposition(氣質之性)” have commonality with the concepts of “The Given from the Vacuity of Natural World(所受於天)”, Up & Down Movement(升降運動), and Yin Fire(陰火) of Primordial Qi in Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury respectively. However, the concept of Primordial Qi in the Theory of Qi-monism refers to the building blocks of all things in the universe, whereas the concept of Primordial Qi that Li Dong-yuan proposed has no meaning of component of body but driving force that maintains the phenomenon of life.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김정각, "張載의 宇宙論고찰 (天人合一의 근거세우기)", 열린정신 인문학 연구, 10(2), pp.191~213 (2009), 인문학연구소
- 김학권, "張載의 우주론과 인간론", 철학연구, 77, pp.67~ (2001)
- 방정균, "李東垣의 陰火論에 對한 硏究", 대한한의학원전학회지, 21(1), pp.175~181 (2008), 대한한의학원전학회
- 孫廣仁, "兩種不同學科範疇的元氣學說", 北京中醫藥大學學報, 22(6), pp.9~10 (1999)
- 吳筱楓, "“補土派”代表醫家李杲學術思想與『內經』理論淵源", 中華中醫藥學會 第十屆全國內經學 術研討會 學術論文集, pp.250~ (2010), 中華中醫藥學會內經學分會
- 吳華强, "元氣源流探折", 廣西中醫藥, 13(4), pp.29~ (1990)
- 陳艶陽, "宋元時期醫學隊伍的組成特色", 醫史新獲, 1, pp.17~ (2003)
- 裘沛然, "中醫歷代各家學說", pp.8~ (1984), 上海科學技術出版社
- 王履, "醫經溯回集", pp.78~ (1993), 人民衛生出版社
- 金 李東垣, "李東垣醫集·內外傷辨惑論", pp.7~ (1995), 人民衛生出版社
- 張載, "完譯 正蒙", pp.15~ (1991), 명문당
- 전국한의과대학 원전학교실, "難經", pp.33~ (2010), 법인문화사
- 전국한의과대학 원전학교실 편찬위원회, "類編黃帝內經", pp.426~ (2009), 주민출판사
- 朱子, "懸吐完譯 大學中庸集註", pp.25~ (1995), 傳統文化硏究會
- 陳大舜, "中醫各家學說", pp.54~ (1989), 湖南科學技術出版社
- 河北醫學院, "靈樞經校釋", pp.353~ (1998), 人民衛生出版社