朱丹溪 相火論의 君火 相火의 개념에 대한 고찰
Study on the Concept of Monarch-fire(君火) and Ministerial-fire (相火) in Zhu Dan-Xi (朱丹溪)’s Ministerial-fire Theory (相火論)
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), the meanings of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火) described in papers published nowadays are not the same. Therefore, it is necessary to rebuild a clear concept. Methods : To understand the relationships among ‘heaven(天)’-‘human(人)’ and ‘name(名)’-‘position(位)’, the core concept of the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), I examined the relationships between ‘heaven(天)’ and ‘human(人)’ in Neo-Confucianism(性理學) of Song(宋) Dynasty and reviewed the notes of Wang Bing(王冰) which were quoted by Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) to set the concept of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火). I studied relevant texts. Results : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), monarch-fire(君火) is perceived as being from greed(人欲) that can cause hyperactivity(妄動) of ministerial-fire(相火), whereas ministerial-fire(相火) is perceived as being able to control monarch-fire(君火) by following the orders from heaven. This point of view is different from the past which recognized monarch-fire (君火) as the owner and ministerial-fire(相火) as the servant. Conclusions : Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) received the ideological impact of Neo-Confucianism, and accepted the notes of Wang Bing, recognized monarch-fire(君火) as ‘name(名)’ and ministerial-fire(相火) as ‘position(位)’, so he voiced the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) that perceived monarch-fire(君火) as fire(火) of the five processes(五行) of human body that came from greed, ministerial-fire(相火) as being in a position to hear the order from the ‘heaven(天)’ to control monarch-fire(君火). But the concept of ministerial-fire(相火) which he set connoted a confusing meaning of ‘nature(性)’ and ‘way(道)’ of Neo-Confucianism. In the later process to solve the problem, life-gate theory(命門學說) was raised, and many researchers had tried to remove the meaning of hyperactivity from the ministerial-fire(相火).
Abstract
Objectives : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), the meanings of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火) described in papers published nowadays are not the same. Therefore, it is necessary to rebuild a clear concept. Methods : To understand the relationships among ‘heaven(天)’-‘human(人)’ and ‘name(名)’-‘position(位)’, the core concept of the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), I examined the relationships between ‘heaven(天)’ and ‘human(人)’ in Neo-Confucianism(性理學) of Song(宋) Dynasty and reviewed the notes of Wang Bing(王冰) which were quoted by Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) to set the concept of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火). I studied relevant texts. Results : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), monarch-fire(君火) is perceived as being from greed(人欲) that can cause hyperactivity(妄動) of ministerial-fire(相火), whereas ministerial-fire(相火) is perceived as being able to control monarch-fire(君火) by following the orders from heaven. This point of view is different from the past which recognized monarch-fire (君火) as the owner and ministerial-fire(相火) as the servant. Conclusions : Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) received the ideological impact of Neo-Confucianism, and accepted the notes of Wang Bing, recognized monarch-fire(君火) as ‘name(名)’ and ministerial-fire(相火) as ‘position(位)’, so he voiced the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) that perceived monarch-fire(君火) as fire(火) of the five processes(五行) of human body that came from greed, ministerial-fire(相火) as being in a position to hear the order from the ‘heaven(天)’ to control monarch-fire(君火). But the concept of ministerial-fire(相火) which he set connoted a confusing meaning of ‘nature(性)’ and ‘way(道)’ of Neo-Confucianism. In the later process to solve the problem, life-gate theory(命門學說) was raised, and many researchers had tried to remove the meaning of hyperactivity from the ministerial-fire(相火).
참고문헌 (13)
- ZH Zhu, "Danxiyiji", pp.10~ (1993), People’s Medical Publishing House Co
- B Wang, "Huangdineijingsuwen", pp.94~ (1977), Wen Kuang Publishing Co
- HJ Kim, "Golden Mean", pp.1~3 (1978), Myung Mun Dang
- G Hu, "A Full Compilation of The Theory of Mind and Principle Volume 1", pp.143~ (1989), Shandong Friendship Press
- DS Chen, "Famous Medical Theories of T.C.M", pp.116~118 (1989), Hunan Science &Technology Press
- 백유상, "？陳無擇의<君火論>과 朱丹溪<相火論>의 比較 考察", 대한한의학원전학회지, 19(3), pp.381~388 (2006), 대한한의학원전학회
- 김기욱, "朱丹溪와 張景岳의 相火論에 관한 比較 硏究", 대한한의학원전학회지, 19(4), pp.12~26 (2006), 대한한의학원전학회
- 김영목, "朱丹溪 相火論의 性理學的 硏究", 동의생리병리학회지, 20(4), pp.784~792 (2006), 대한동의병리학회
- 원종실, "원대 유의(元代儒醫) 주단계(朱丹溪) 의론(醫論)에 나타난이학사상연원고(理學思想淵源考)", 동양철학, 23(23), pp.175~206 (2005), 한국동양철학회
- CP Yao, "Study on the Influence of Neo-Confucianism on DX Zhu’s Medical Theory", J of Chinese Philosophy History, 2, pp.114~ (2011)
- JM Si, "Study on the Ministerial-fire Theory of DX Zhu", Jiangxi J. of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2, pp.16~ (2010)
- Q Dai, "Study on the Psychological Mechanism of T.C.M. to Utilize the relation of Monarch-fire and Ministerial-fire of DX Zhu’s Theory", J. of Beijing U. of T.C.M, 25(2), pp.6~ (2002)
- CH Cheng, "Study on the Origin and Flow of Ministerial-fire Theory", J. Gansu College of T.C.M, 20(3), pp.13~ (2003)