기방무용의 특성연구 - 이매방과 김수악 춤 중심으로 -
A Study on Characteristics of Gibang Dance
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, a localized and in-depth approach was applied rather than a comprehensive one for Gibang dance by focusing on the representative Gibang dances such as Lee Mae-Bang's Gwangju Geommu, Salpurichum reprenting the Jeonlla province and Kim Su-Ak's Jinju Geommu, Nongae Salpurichum representing the Gyeongsang province. The formal characteristics including the movements of the dances listed above were studied while document research, observation and interview were used as the study method. Of course, Lee Mae-Bang himself was not a Kisaeng but the movement and characteristics of his dance sufficiently retain the characteristics of Gibang dance. Therefore, his representative dances were selected as the study subjects while the limitation of the study is that it only deals with the dances of Lee Mae-Bang and Kim Su-Ak among many other Gibang dances. Since people are not properly recognizing the Gibang dance, 'Gibang' is usually related with 'Sexuality'. However, Gibang was originated from the Silla period when the state protected Gibang as a nation but it has been recognized in a wrong way when it was discontinued during the late Joseon period through the period of occupation by Japan. As describe above, Gibang dance did not lose the essential qualities as the dance which are the technical aspect and artistic spirit remaining in exitence from the past. However, its artistic value has been underestimated by the recognition of the public. Rather than evaluating Gibang dance as what is shown in the rapidly changing 21st century, it is advisable to discuss the essential values and origin of Gibang dance such as its artistry, techniques and so on. Therefore, this study also deals with the history and social background that brought wrong recognition of the public towards Gibang dance. By examining the representative figures from Jeonlla province and Gyeongsang province and the formal characteristics of their dances, the characteristics as well as how they have been inherited can be identified. The significance of this study lies in the fact that it provides the direction for preserving the traditional dances and that it makes people properly recognize the Gibang dance.
Abstract
In this study, a localized and in-depth approach was applied rather than a comprehensive one for Gibang dance by focusing on the representative Gibang dances such as Lee Mae-Bang's Gwangju Geommu, Salpurichum reprenting the Jeonlla province and Kim Su-Ak's Jinju Geommu, Nongae Salpurichum representing the Gyeongsang province. The formal characteristics including the movements of the dances listed above were studied while document research, observation and interview were used as the study method. Of course, Lee Mae-Bang himself was not a Kisaeng but the movement and characteristics of his dance sufficiently retain the characteristics of Gibang dance. Therefore, his representative dances were selected as the study subjects while the limitation of the study is that it only deals with the dances of Lee Mae-Bang and Kim Su-Ak among many other Gibang dances. Since people are not properly recognizing the Gibang dance, 'Gibang' is usually related with 'Sexuality'. However, Gibang was originated from the Silla period when the state protected Gibang as a nation but it has been recognized in a wrong way when it was discontinued during the late Joseon period through the period of occupation by Japan. As describe above, Gibang dance did not lose the essential qualities as the dance which are the technical aspect and artistic spirit remaining in exitence from the past. However, its artistic value has been underestimated by the recognition of the public. Rather than evaluating Gibang dance as what is shown in the rapidly changing 21st century, it is advisable to discuss the essential values and origin of Gibang dance such as its artistry, techniques and so on. Therefore, this study also deals with the history and social background that brought wrong recognition of the public towards Gibang dance. By examining the representative figures from Jeonlla province and Gyeongsang province and the formal characteristics of their dances, the characteristics as well as how they have been inherited can be identified. The significance of this study lies in the fact that it provides the direction for preserving the traditional dances and that it makes people properly recognize the Gibang dance.
참고문헌 (19)
- 고재현, "근대제도개편에 따른 교방 및 기방 무용의 변화양상과 특징 고찰", 석사, pp.2006
- 김수현, "한국근대음악기사자료집 잡지편권 8" (2008), 민속원
- 김승일, "기방 무용의 역사적 변천과정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 노동은, "한국 근대 음악사", pp.557~ (1995), 한길사
- 류혜진, "기방무용의 변천과정 연구", 석사, pp.2001
- 백현미, "한국창극사연구" (1997), 태학사
- 세계민족무용연구소, "김수악 선생님과의 좌담", 민족무용, (5) (2004)
- 성기숙, "한국전통춤연구" (1999), 현대미학사
- 성기숙, "기녀 및 교방 춤에 대한 사적 고찰", 한국무용연구, 11 (1993)
- 성기숙, "한국근대춤의 전개와 근대성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 송미정, "현 전통무용에 내재된 기방무 성향에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 송방송, "한국음악통사" (1984), 일조각
- 유인화, "춤과 그늘" (2008), 동아시아출판사
- 이규태, "평양기생학교 이야기" (1999), 조선일보
- 이명선, "전통무용에 나타난 기방 무용에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2002
- 정병설, "나는기생이다" (2007), 문학동네
- 한효림, "역사적 맥락에서 살펴본 기방 무용", 민족무용, (9) (2006)
- 허연희, "기방무용의 역사적 전개 과정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1997
- 홍송화, "교방춤에서 무대무 용으로의 전이과정 고찰", 석사, pp.2001
