본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

命門相火學說에 대한 의사학적 고찰

A Historical Study on The Myeongmunsanghwa(命門相火) Theory

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

The concept of Myeongmun(命門) could be found in early medical texts such as 『Naegyeong(內經)』 and 『Nan-gyeong(難經)』, but the real idea about Myeongmun(命門) had mainly originated from 『Nan-gyeong』, in successive medical research. The concept of Myeongmun in 『Nan-gyeong』 could be read as an organ without form, and under the influence of Taoism theory, the concept of Myeongmun could also be understood as Danjeon(丹田). The theory about Danjeon in Taoism theory affected the concept of Myeongmun in medical theory to be closely related with the concept of Hwa(火), especially Sanghwa(相火). Through the theoretical development of Myeongmun and Sanghwa, the concept of Sanghwa could have been understood as a kind of Hwa(火) in human body, and the theoretical development like this had appeared from the time of Geumwon(金元) dynasty, when many medical doctors had experienced the Naedan(內丹) theory of Taoism. Under the influence of Taoism theory, from the time of the Geumwon dynasty to Myeong(明) dynasty, efforts to explain the concept of Myeongmun and Sanghwa in the human body made various meaningful theoretical products, which was not well-known within medical theories of ancient times. We need to recognize the differences in the understanding of the concept of Myeongmun and Sanghwa among each medical doctors, especially among those that showed opposite views. This study is based on the opinion that the difference in the understanding of the concept of Myeongmun and Sang-hwa among each medical doctors had been mainly due to the difference of understanding and analyzing the Taoism theory as the origin of the Myeongmun and Sanghwa theory in medicine. Regarding this, this study will take an overview of the successive development of Myeongmun and Sang-hwa theory in medicine, and will also look into the concept of Danjeon and Sanghwa in Taoism theory, which will allow better understanding of the progress of development of the Myeongmun and Sanghwa theory.

Abstract

The concept of Myeongmun(命門) could be found in early medical texts such as 『Naegyeong(內經)』 and 『Nan-gyeong(難經)』, but the real idea about Myeongmun(命門) had mainly originated from 『Nan-gyeong』, in successive medical research. The concept of Myeongmun in 『Nan-gyeong』 could be read as an organ without form, and under the influence of Taoism theory, the concept of Myeongmun could also be understood as Danjeon(丹田). The theory about Danjeon in Taoism theory affected the concept of Myeongmun in medical theory to be closely related with the concept of Hwa(火), especially Sanghwa(相火). Through the theoretical development of Myeongmun and Sanghwa, the concept of Sanghwa could have been understood as a kind of Hwa(火) in human body, and the theoretical development like this had appeared from the time of Geumwon(金元) dynasty, when many medical doctors had experienced the Naedan(內丹) theory of Taoism. Under the influence of Taoism theory, from the time of the Geumwon dynasty to Myeong(明) dynasty, efforts to explain the concept of Myeongmun and Sanghwa in the human body made various meaningful theoretical products, which was not well-known within medical theories of ancient times. We need to recognize the differences in the understanding of the concept of Myeongmun and Sanghwa among each medical doctors, especially among those that showed opposite views. This study is based on the opinion that the difference in the understanding of the concept of Myeongmun and Sang-hwa among each medical doctors had been mainly due to the difference of understanding and analyzing the Taoism theory as the origin of the Myeongmun and Sanghwa theory in medicine. Regarding this, this study will take an overview of the successive development of Myeongmun and Sang-hwa theory in medicine, and will also look into the concept of Danjeon and Sanghwa in Taoism theory, which will allow better understanding of the progress of development of the Myeongmun and Sanghwa theory.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 張敬文, "孫思邈對命門學說發展的貢獻", 四天中醫, 25(2), pp.40~ (2007)
  2. 孟慶雲, "命門學說的理論源流及實踐價値", 中國中醫基礎醫學雜誌, 12(7), pp.483~ (2006)
  3. 李遠國, "論鐘離權․呂洞賓的內丹學說", 宗敎學硏究, 2, pp.1~ (2005)
  4. 傅景華, "黃帝內經素問", pp.11~ (1997), 中醫古籍出版社
  5. 李生紹, "黃帝內經靈樞", pp.13~ (1997), 中醫古籍出版社
  6. 葛洪, "抱朴子內篇校釋", pp.111~ (2002), 中華書局
  7. 滑壽, "難經本義", pp.92~ (2008), 人民軍醫出版社
  8. 楊上善, "黃帝內經太素", pp.14~ (2006), 學苑出版社
  9. 王冰, "重廣補注黃帝內經素問", pp.32~ (2004), 學苑出版社
  10. 孫思邈, "備急千金要方校釋", pp.409~ (1998), 人民衛生出版社
  11. 劉河間, "素問病機氣宜保命集·病機論第七. 金元四大家醫學全書", pp.24~ (1992), 天津科學技術出版社
  12. 張元素, "臟腑標本藥式. 張元素醫學全書", pp.83~ (2006), 中國中醫藥出版社
  13. 李東垣, "脾胃論. 金元四大家醫書集成", pp.574~ (1992), 天津科學技術出版社
  14. 李東垣, "蘭室秘藏. 金元四大家醫書集成", pp.637~ (1992), 天津科學技術出版社
  15. 朱丹溪, "格致餘論. 金元四大家醫書集成", pp.918~ (1992), 天津科學技術出版社
  16. 孫一奎, "醫旨緖餘. 孫一奎醫學全書", pp.649~ (1999), 中國中醫藥出版社
  17. 張景岳, "類經附翼. 張景岳醫學全書", pp.796~ (1999), 中國中醫藥出版社
  18. 趙獻可, "醫貫. 醫案醫話醫論名著集成", pp.828~ (1997), 華夏出版社
  19. 張景岳, "景岳全書", pp.95~ (2007), 法仁文化社
  20. 施肩吾, "鍾呂傳道集․鍾呂丹道經典譯解", pp.53~ (2008), 宗敎文化出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)