小字本系統 『金匱要略』 吳遷本의 特徵에 대한 考察- 鄧珍本과의 比較를 中心으로 -
A Study on the Characteristics of the Wuqian Edition(吳遷本) of Jinguiyaolue(金匱要略) written in Small Letters
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : The recently reported Wuqian edition(吳遷本) Jinguiyaolue(金匱要略) is known to bewritten in small letters unlike other large lettered versions of the book. The Wuqianedition(吳遷本) takes after the name of Wuqian who copied an ancient version that wasfound at the time(Ming dyanasty, 1395). It is known to differ in organization and contentsto other versions. In this study, I would like to examine how the small-lettered version ofthe Jinguiyaolue had been created, through a thorough examination of the Wuqian edition,and evaluate its value as a new version of the Jinguiyaolue. Method : First, the systems of both large-lettered and small-lettered versions of the Jinguiyaolue were briefly examined, followed by comparison from chapter 1 to 22, of organization,contents, and formulas between the oldest version of the large-lettered versions, theDeng-zhen edition, and the newly discovered Wuqian edition of which examples of eachitem are listed. The original source was identified for parts that were different. Result & Conclusion : 1. The Deng-zhen edition and Wuqian edition show vast differences in theorganization, table of contents, name of chapter, location of each verse or line,existence of certain verses or lines, name of formula, quantity of medicinal ingredients,processing methods and other aspects. 2. The small-lettered edition was published based on the large-lettered edition of theJinguiyaolue published by the Jiaozheng-yishuju(校正醫書局) after a generalcross-examination process followed by selection, modification and supplementation ofthe large-lettered edition. Reference texts used in cross-examination wereQianjinyaofang(千金要方), Waitaimiyao(外臺秘要), Maijing(脈經), and Shanghanlun(傷寒論). 3. Considering Wuqian's own annotations and preface, it is clear that he wanted tocreate the best version of the Jinguiyaolue. Wuqian himself seems to have hadprofessional knowledge of bibliography and medicine.
Abstract
Objective : The recently reported Wuqian edition(吳遷本) Jinguiyaolue(金匱要略) is known to bewritten in small letters unlike other large lettered versions of the book. The Wuqianedition(吳遷本) takes after the name of Wuqian who copied an ancient version that wasfound at the time(Ming dyanasty, 1395). It is known to differ in organization and contentsto other versions. In this study, I would like to examine how the small-lettered version ofthe Jinguiyaolue had been created, through a thorough examination of the Wuqian edition,and evaluate its value as a new version of the Jinguiyaolue. Method : First, the systems of both large-lettered and small-lettered versions of the Jinguiyaolue were briefly examined, followed by comparison from chapter 1 to 22, of organization,contents, and formulas between the oldest version of the large-lettered versions, theDeng-zhen edition, and the newly discovered Wuqian edition of which examples of eachitem are listed. The original source was identified for parts that were different. Result & Conclusion : 1. The Deng-zhen edition and Wuqian edition show vast differences in theorganization, table of contents, name of chapter, location of each verse or line,existence of certain verses or lines, name of formula, quantity of medicinal ingredients,processing methods and other aspects. 2. The small-lettered edition was published based on the large-lettered edition of theJinguiyaolue published by the Jiaozheng-yishuju(校正醫書局) after a generalcross-examination process followed by selection, modification and supplementation ofthe large-lettered edition. Reference texts used in cross-examination wereQianjinyaofang(千金要方), Waitaimiyao(外臺秘要), Maijing(脈經), and Shanghanlun(傷寒論). 3. Considering Wuqian's own annotations and preface, it is clear that he wanted tocreate the best version of the Jinguiyaolue. Wuqian himself seems to have hadprofessional knowledge of bibliography and medicine.
참고문헌 (16)
- 眞柳誠, "金匱要略的成書與現存板本問題", 中華醫史雜誌, 39(6), pp.359~ (2009)
- 段逸山, "明抄北宋小字本金匱要略方硏究", 中醫文獻雜誌, (2), pp.2~ (2010)
- 眞柳誠, "北宋政府校正『金匱要略』小字本の出現", 日本東洋醫學雜誌, pp.59~ (2008)
- 錢超塵, "宋本『傷寒論』刊行后流傳演變簡史", 醫史文獻, (2), pp.12~ (2004)
- 김경철, "여성 견비통 환자의 생혈액 형태에 대한 임상적인 연구", 대한한의학회지, 25(3), pp.99~104 (2004), 대한한의학회
- 日本東洋醫學會 傷寒金匱編刊小委員會, "善本翻刻 『傷寒論』(趙開美原本)·『金匱要略』(鄧珍本·吳遷本)", pp.61~ (2009), 日本東洋醫學會
- 張仲景, "仲景全書", pp.353~ (1989), 대성문화사
- 李景榮, "備急千金要方", pp.579~ (1997), 人民衛生出版社
- 王燾, "外臺秘要方", pp.15~ (1993), 華夏出版社
- 沈炎南, "脈經校注", pp.297~ (1991), 人民衛生出版社
- 陳紀藩, "金匱要略", pp.8~ (2000), 人民衛生出版社
- 何任, "金匱要略校注", pp.47~ (1990), 人民衛生出版社
- 吳謙, "標點索引御纂醫宗金鑑", pp.335~ (2006), 法仁文化社
- 李景榮, "千金翼方校釋", pp.238~ (1998), 人民衛生出版社
- 최달영, "金匱要略釋講", pp.588~ (2004), 東國大學校出版部
- 許浚, "新增補對譯 東醫寶鑑", pp.709~ (2012), 法仁文化社
