『東醫壽世保元』 引用文 硏究에 적용할 수 있는 方法論에 관한 考察(3)

Abstract

This paper is sequel to the paper titled 'A study on research methodology of the quoted verses inDong-uisusebowon(2)'. In the previous study, Tao-ren-cheng-qi-tang(桃仁承氣湯) and Di-dang-tang(抵當湯) lines from Shanghanlun quoted in the Dong-uisusebowon were examined. Through thisstudy, we learned that Heo, Jun corrected these texts in the Dong-uibogam to avoid logicalcontradiction, which were again quoted by Yi, Jema in the Dong-uisusebowon. Thus the quotations inYi's book were also corrected of the contradictory lines as found in the source text, Shanghanlun. Inthis paper, I would like to examine the lines regarding Jeokseokji-uyeoryang-tang(赤石脂禹餘糧湯) andGan-cao-xie-xin-tang(甘草瀉心湯). Firstly, in the case of Jeokseokji-uyeoryang-tang(赤石脂禹餘糧湯)lines, many changes in contents were made to resolve contradiction within the lines as previouscases. By quoting the Dong-uibogam directly, Yi, Jema inherited the thoughts of Heo, Jun in hiswork. Secondly, in the case of Gan-cao-xie-xin-tang(甘草瀉心湯) lines, Heo, Jun suggested newperspectives on Pi(痞, stuffiness) and Jie-xiong(結胸, chest bind) different to those of Zhang ZhongJing, based on empirical knowledge of later days. Yi, Jema quoted these corrected lines, whichimplies Yi's agreement to the theories of Heo. However, Yi made clear his difference in perspectivewith Heo through his unique theory of the Four(Sasang) Constitutions. I conclude my researchregarding quotations in the Dong-uisusebowon by stressing the necessity of research on theDong-uibogam prior to any further research regarding quotations in the Dong-uisusebowon.