본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

方有執의 『傷寒論條辨』 條文 구성에 대한 考察

A Study on the Composition of Shanghanluntiaobian(傷寒論條辨)

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate the method of setting up logic and estimate Fang Youzhi’s work through Shanghanluntiaobian. Methods : Wang Shuhe’s old edition Shanghanlun and Fang Youzhi’s Shanghanluntiaobian were compared and several essential provisions were analyzed and addressed the positive and negative aspects of Fang Youzhi’s revising old edition Shanghanlun mixed bamboo tablets. Results : Fang Youzhi’s changing Bianmaifa(「辨脈法」) and Pingmaifa(「平脈法」) and placement Bianchishiyemaizhengbingzhi chapter after Liujingbingmaizhengbingzhi for discriminating convulsion·dampness·summer heat stroke from febrile diseases is appropriate. Fang Youzhi’s deletion Shanghanli(「傷寒例」) chapter that has a guiding characteristics shows his editorial policy. Fang Youzhi’s addition Bianwenbingfengwenzabingmaizhengbingzhi chapter is for discriminating febrile disease from epidemic febrile disease·wind warmth syndrome·miscellaneous disease and it indicates Shanghanlun is a book of treatment after differentiation of syndromes containing epidemic febrile disease and miscellaneous disease. Through Fang Youzhi’s revising method I can see several positive aspects. First he tried to refine the logic of the content of Shanghanlun and accord with an actual situation. Second he shows Shanghanlun is a book of treatment after differentiation of syndromes containing epidemic febrile disease and miscellaneous disease and tried to see Shanghanlun clearly. A criticism of the Preserving Old Edition Shanghanlun group could interrupt flexibility and creative thinking reading Shanghanlun and a criticism to the Sangangdingli Principles of the several exegetists is a productive criticism because medicine treats human being so it cannot be completed by a logic. Conclusions : All of these processes are Fang Youzhi’s endeavour for strengthening the system and logicality of the old edition Shanghanlun and it is meaningful to show a method to read Shanghanlun to beginners.

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate the method of setting up logic and estimate Fang Youzhi’s work through Shanghanluntiaobian. Methods : Wang Shuhe’s old edition Shanghanlun and Fang Youzhi’s Shanghanluntiaobian were compared and several essential provisions were analyzed and addressed the positive and negative aspects of Fang Youzhi’s revising old edition Shanghanlun mixed bamboo tablets. Results : Fang Youzhi’s changing Bianmaifa(「辨脈法」) and Pingmaifa(「平脈法」) and placement Bianchishiyemaizhengbingzhi chapter after Liujingbingmaizhengbingzhi for discriminating convulsion·dampness·summer heat stroke from febrile diseases is appropriate. Fang Youzhi’s deletion Shanghanli(「傷寒例」) chapter that has a guiding characteristics shows his editorial policy. Fang Youzhi’s addition Bianwenbingfengwenzabingmaizhengbingzhi chapter is for discriminating febrile disease from epidemic febrile disease·wind warmth syndrome·miscellaneous disease and it indicates Shanghanlun is a book of treatment after differentiation of syndromes containing epidemic febrile disease and miscellaneous disease. Through Fang Youzhi’s revising method I can see several positive aspects. First he tried to refine the logic of the content of Shanghanlun and accord with an actual situation. Second he shows Shanghanlun is a book of treatment after differentiation of syndromes containing epidemic febrile disease and miscellaneous disease and tried to see Shanghanlun clearly. A criticism of the Preserving Old Edition Shanghanlun group could interrupt flexibility and creative thinking reading Shanghanlun and a criticism to the Sangangdingli Principles of the several exegetists is a productive criticism because medicine treats human being so it cannot be completed by a logic. Conclusions : All of these processes are Fang Youzhi’s endeavour for strengthening the system and logicality of the old edition Shanghanlun and it is meaningful to show a method to read Shanghanlun to beginners.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Eun SM, "History of SanghanOnbyeong" (2007), Jumin
  2. Chen DS, "Theories of Different Schools" (2001), Daesung Publishing Company
  3. Nanjingzhongyixueyuan, "Shanghanlunyishi" (1992), Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  4. Fang YZ, "Shanghanluntiaobian (Zhongguoyixuedachengxuji vol.25)" (2000), Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  5. Moon JJ, "Precise Interpretation of Shanghanlun", pp.256~ (2000), Publisher of Kyunghee Univ
  6. Zang QZ, "Zhangqingzishanghanlun (Zhongguoyixuedacheng vol.6)" (1992), Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  7. Zang ZC, "Shanghanlunzongyin (Zhangzhicongyixuequanshu)" (1999), Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe
  8. Chen XY, "(Daziduanju) Chenxiuyuanyishuqishierzhong" (1964), Wenguangtushuyouxiangongsi
  9. Ke Qin, "Shanghanlaisuji" (1978), Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  10. You ZJ, "Shanghanguanzhuji" (1978), Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  11. Yang YG, "How Fangyouzhi repeatedly correcting the error", Zhongyiyaoxuebao (1988)
  12. Shen MN, "Roughly discuss Shanghanluntiaobian", 廣西中醫藥 (1983)
  13. Zhuo Qun, "Fangyouzhi and Shanghanluntiaobian", Tianjinzhongyixueyuanxuebao (1984)
  14. 장우창, "三綱鼎立 論爭에 대한 소고", 대한한의학원전학회지, 19(2), pp.108~114 (2006), 대한한의학원전학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)