영화 「미몽」을 통해 본 1930년대 춤의 의미
Status of dance in Korean society in the 1930s by observing it from a movie SweetDream
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper studies the status of dance in Korean society in the 1930s by observing it from a movie SweetDream(미몽, 1936) on the viewpoint of symbolic interactionism of Erving Goffman. Having been produced in time when the nation was under the Japanese colonial rule, the movie illustrated the society experiencing confliction between its traditional ideology and western culture introduced. In that situation, the society was the “total institution” in the symbolic interaction theory, while the western-styled dance theater in the movie, a place extended from the social reality, played the role to help break the rules of the total institution. Also, the main character Ae-Soon’s behavior to go off the track could be explained with the “mortification of self” which Goffman suggested. In the movie, Ae-Soon, an ordinary housewife, went off the “right-track” to live a different life with her lover in a hotel room and later, ended up her life in a hospital. Here, the modern woman Ae-Soon’s death implies punishment to herself who threatened the order of the patriarchal society with her “ill-behavior”, and with her situational impropriety of reckless spending stemmed from institutional ceremony. Having lost her identity through the mortification of self, Ae-Soon went to the stage of “reorganization of individual”, to be injected a new identity while watching a dance performance of the male character CHO Taek Won. In this part of the movie, the “reorganizing of individual” process while watching dance performance seemed resistance to what the “institution” requested her to do. However, ending up her life of the new identity could be interpreted that things finally went with the intention of the “institution”. Also, although meeting CHO Taek Won was a trigger to resist to the “institution” to Ae-Soon, she was, finally, inevitable to be assimilated to the society through the “recipient’s adaptation”The focus of this analysis is on the dance performance being set as ideal to the modern woman Ae-Soon in the movie. This reflects that the status of dance at the time was quite high, and showing dance performance of CHO Taek Won in the movie indicates that dance performance at the time was a popular mean to take a look at the foreign culture. Also, casting a real dancer CHO Taek Won for the fictitious story shows his popularity at the time, and showing full-screen dance performance in the movie seems intentional to promote the dancer CHO Taek Won, which forced the movie audience to be the audience of the dance performance as well. Contrary to these days, there were only a few of western style dance theaters in the 1930s. Therefore, regardless the genre, performing arts were all performed at same places. It indicates that the general public was equally accessible to whatever kind of performing arts at the time, which is very different from these days where the development of media tools makes people not to bother themselves to trip all the way to theaters to watch theater-origin dance performance. In conclusion, it could be said that dancers’ status or popularity in the modern society has been lowered than in the 1930s.
Abstract
This paper studies the status of dance in Korean society in the 1930s by observing it from a movie SweetDream(미몽, 1936) on the viewpoint of symbolic interactionism of Erving Goffman. Having been produced in time when the nation was under the Japanese colonial rule, the movie illustrated the society experiencing confliction between its traditional ideology and western culture introduced. In that situation, the society was the “total institution” in the symbolic interaction theory, while the western-styled dance theater in the movie, a place extended from the social reality, played the role to help break the rules of the total institution. Also, the main character Ae-Soon’s behavior to go off the track could be explained with the “mortification of self” which Goffman suggested. In the movie, Ae-Soon, an ordinary housewife, went off the “right-track” to live a different life with her lover in a hotel room and later, ended up her life in a hospital. Here, the modern woman Ae-Soon’s death implies punishment to herself who threatened the order of the patriarchal society with her “ill-behavior”, and with her situational impropriety of reckless spending stemmed from institutional ceremony. Having lost her identity through the mortification of self, Ae-Soon went to the stage of “reorganization of individual”, to be injected a new identity while watching a dance performance of the male character CHO Taek Won. In this part of the movie, the “reorganizing of individual” process while watching dance performance seemed resistance to what the “institution” requested her to do. However, ending up her life of the new identity could be interpreted that things finally went with the intention of the “institution”. Also, although meeting CHO Taek Won was a trigger to resist to the “institution” to Ae-Soon, she was, finally, inevitable to be assimilated to the society through the “recipient’s adaptation”The focus of this analysis is on the dance performance being set as ideal to the modern woman Ae-Soon in the movie. This reflects that the status of dance at the time was quite high, and showing dance performance of CHO Taek Won in the movie indicates that dance performance at the time was a popular mean to take a look at the foreign culture. Also, casting a real dancer CHO Taek Won for the fictitious story shows his popularity at the time, and showing full-screen dance performance in the movie seems intentional to promote the dancer CHO Taek Won, which forced the movie audience to be the audience of the dance performance as well. Contrary to these days, there were only a few of western style dance theaters in the 1930s. Therefore, regardless the genre, performing arts were all performed at same places. It indicates that the general public was equally accessible to whatever kind of performing arts at the time, which is very different from these days where the development of media tools makes people not to bother themselves to trip all the way to theaters to watch theater-origin dance performance. In conclusion, it could be said that dancers’ status or popularity in the modern society has been lowered than in the 1930s.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김주리, "모던걸,목도리를버려라:근대적패션의풍경" (2005), 살림
- 연구공간수유, "신여성" (2005), 한겨레신문사
- 유미희, "세기마지막페미니스트최승희" (2006), 민속원
- 정의숙, "몸짓의빛그한순간의자유" (2004), 성균관대학교출판부
- 조희문, "한국영화의쟁점1" (2002), 집문당
- 춤, "춤·지성1" (2000), 명경
- 필립스미스, "문화이론" (2008), 이학사
- 프란츠파농(1952), "검은피부하얀가면" (1998), 인간사랑
- 김소영, "신여성의 시각적 재현", 문학과 영상, 7(2), pp.93~130 (2006), 문학과영상학회
- 문영희, "한국 영화에 나타난 근대와 여성정체성-탈주하는 여성정체성: 미몽에서「가족의 탄생」까지", 여성학연구, 16, pp.237~242 (2006), 부산대학교 영상학 연구소
- 배연형, "근대극장 사진자료 연구-협률사·원각사·광무대-", 한국사상과문화, 30, pp.270~318 (2005)
- 백현미, "원각사의 설립과정과 연극사적 성격", 판소리 연구, 6, pp.253~287 (1995), 판소리학회
- 신강호, "<미몽>, <반도의 봄>의 영화 스타일 분석", 영화연구, 33(33), pp.395~421 (2007), 한국영화학회
- 이용관, "식민지 시기 영화의 탈식민적 경향 :1930~1945년 영화를 중심으로", 영상예술연구, (13), pp.263~288 (2008), 영상예술학회
- 장영순, "1920년대 여성문화와 미디어의 시선 ―‘모던 걸’의 신체 표상과 젠더 ―", 일본학보, 1(74), pp.291~308 (2008), 한국일본학회
- 주창윤, "1920∼1930년대 ‘모던 세대’의 형성과정", 한국언론학보, 52(5), pp.186~206 (2008), 한국언론학회
- 성기숙, "한국 근대춤의 전개와 근대성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 이주영, "조택원의 만종 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- 정민아, "1930년대 조선 영화와 젠더 재구성", 박사, pp.2010
- "1903년 6월 24일자 황성신문", ~
- "1908년 1월 22일자황성신문", ~
- "1914년 7월 19일자 매일신보", ~
- "2007년 11월 29일자 경향신문", ~
- "2007년 8월 23일자 YTN TV", ~
- "2010년 5월 25일자 강원도민일보", ~
