1960, 1970년대 한국 무용교육 제도의 근대적 이행 개인무용연구소에서 대학 무용과로
The Institutional Transition of Dance Education in the 1960, 70s’ Korea - from Private Dance Schools to Dance Departments in Universities
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study attempted to describe the institutional transition of dance education which had occured in the 1960, 70s’ Korea. Using Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method, it approached the transitional process as a discursive struggles between two types of institution: private dance schools and dance departments in universities. Though both appeared in the modern era, the later was assumed as a modernized institution, but the former was not. The dance department in university was regarded as modern, but at the same time it claimed the ruling ideology, modernization. The analysis of the discourse of the time identified five thematic discourses. Among these, two discourses, ‘well trained dancers’ and ‘freedom for dance creation’ were for the private dance schools; and three discourses, ‘obtainment of degrees and certifications’, ‘specialized and systemic curriculum’and ‘sustainable and reasonal reproducing system in the field of dance as an art’ were for the universities’ dance departments.
Abstract
The study attempted to describe the institutional transition of dance education which had occured in the 1960, 70s’ Korea. Using Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method, it approached the transitional process as a discursive struggles between two types of institution: private dance schools and dance departments in universities. Though both appeared in the modern era, the later was assumed as a modernized institution, but the former was not. The dance department in university was regarded as modern, but at the same time it claimed the ruling ideology, modernization. The analysis of the discourse of the time identified five thematic discourses. Among these, two discourses, ‘well trained dancers’ and ‘freedom for dance creation’ were for the private dance schools; and three discourses, ‘obtainment of degrees and certifications’, ‘specialized and systemic curriculum’and ‘sustainable and reasonal reproducing system in the field of dance as an art’ were for the universities’ dance departments.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가 : 기호의 우리, 우리의 기호" (1994), 민음사
- 윤택림, "문화와 역사연구를 위한 질적연구 방법론" (2004), 아르케
- Bourdieu, P., "언어와 상징권력" (2014), 나남
- Fairclough, N., "대중매체 담화 분석" (1995), 한국문화사
- Fairclough, N., "Language and Power" (2001), Longman
- Fairclough, N., "Discourse as Social Interaction : A multidisciplinary introduction" (1997), SAGE
- Wodak, R., "Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis" (2001), SAGE
- 김영욱, "금연과 흡연의 담론 경쟁: 비판적 담론 분석(CDA)의 적용", 한국언론학보, 58(5), pp.333~361 (2014), 한국언론학회
- 윤택림, "기억에서 역사로-구술사의 이론적 방법론적 쟁점에 대한 고찰", 한국문화인류학, 25, pp.273~294 (1994)
- 윤지현, "공연 팸플릿에 나타난 한국의 무용 장(Field) -부르디외의 이론을 중심으로", 무용역사기록학, 15, pp.93~120 (2008), 무용역사기록학회
- 윤지현, "대중매체에 나타난 한국 무용의 상징적 경계 연구－1970년대 《선데이서울》과 《동아일보》를 중심으로", 대한무용학회 논문집, 72(3), pp.133~154 (2014), 대한무용학회
- 이기일, "학생인권은 교권에 대립하는가?:교권 대 학생인권 프레임에 대한 비판적 담론분석", 교육사회학연구, 22(4), pp.171~197 (2012), 한국교육사회학회
- 최해리, "무용구술사를 통한 새로운 한국근현대무용사 쓰기의 가능성 모색 : 국립예술자료원의 2008∼2009년도 무용구술채록문을 중심으로", 박사, 체육학부, pp.2012
- Dijk, T. A. V., "Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis", Discourse & Society, 4, pp.249~283 (1993)
- "한국근현대예술사 구술채록연구 무용분야 구술채록 자료집" (2016)[URL]