본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전

The Formation and the Development of National History in the Pre-Modern Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper has reviewed the process how the national history had been formed and developed in pre-modern Korea. The national history was viewed as the history of one’s own country, i.e. the history of a dynasty and as the history of a historical community, i.e. the history of a nation. This viewpoint was completed in Dongguktonggam(Comprehensive Mirror of the Eastern Kingdom) in the 15th century. This was the official history of a nation compiled by bureaucrats and the political history played a key role. In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, there was a tendency even the historical record of an individual was included in the national history. A private recording of the present history of his kingdom was practiced during this period. The historical science of the East Asia including Korea was the “documentary-centered history” preserving the record thoroughly. The historical science focusing on the record had been developed from the history of a dynasty to the comprehensive history that had been enlarged to the historical concept of the records of both a nation and an individual were combined. Also, as a classified history, the whole history since Dangun(Legendary Founder of Korea) and all the contents of history up to the Joseon dynasty were treated and resulted in Donggukmunheonbigo(Reference Compilation of Documents on Korea) of all the official and personal records compiled and arranged. History came to be enlarged and developed from the political history of a nation to the history of system, economy, society and culture and contained not only the history of a nation but also the materials of civilian lives including personal or clan history. The national history of the West was a product of modern nationalism and a man-made one. However, in case of Korea, the national history had long been arranged before nationalism appeared. This is what distinguished the national history of Korea from the Western history of a nation. The new modification of the national history of Korea had developed was caused by the acceptance of Western historical science and the drastic change of the Korean society. Korean history has been changed from the historical science focusing on records to the historical science focusing on description and has also been developed as the learning to explain the present situation. In such process of the development, the modern Korean history was distorted as the exclusive nationalistic history owed to the Japanese colonial rule. The rise and the fall of the nation had once been the key problem of the historical science. This cannot be the right path of the historical science. At the present, it is thought that it is time the term of ‘nation’ to be duly deleted in history as our society has been rapidly changing into a multiracial society. The national history should be renamed as Korean history and take on universality and objectivity in respect of describing the history of human lives.

Abstract

This paper has reviewed the process how the national history had been formed and developed in pre-modern Korea. The national history was viewed as the history of one’s own country, i.e. the history of a dynasty and as the history of a historical community, i.e. the history of a nation. This viewpoint was completed in Dongguktonggam(Comprehensive Mirror of the Eastern Kingdom) in the 15th century. This was the official history of a nation compiled by bureaucrats and the political history played a key role. In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, there was a tendency even the historical record of an individual was included in the national history. A private recording of the present history of his kingdom was practiced during this period. The historical science of the East Asia including Korea was the “documentary-centered history” preserving the record thoroughly. The historical science focusing on the record had been developed from the history of a dynasty to the comprehensive history that had been enlarged to the historical concept of the records of both a nation and an individual were combined. Also, as a classified history, the whole history since Dangun(Legendary Founder of Korea) and all the contents of history up to the Joseon dynasty were treated and resulted in Donggukmunheonbigo(Reference Compilation of Documents on Korea) of all the official and personal records compiled and arranged. History came to be enlarged and developed from the political history of a nation to the history of system, economy, society and culture and contained not only the history of a nation but also the materials of civilian lives including personal or clan history. The national history of the West was a product of modern nationalism and a man-made one. However, in case of Korea, the national history had long been arranged before nationalism appeared. This is what distinguished the national history of Korea from the Western history of a nation. The new modification of the national history of Korea had developed was caused by the acceptance of Western historical science and the drastic change of the Korean society. Korean history has been changed from the historical science focusing on records to the historical science focusing on description and has also been developed as the learning to explain the present situation. In such process of the development, the modern Korean history was distorted as the exclusive nationalistic history owed to the Japanese colonial rule. The rise and the fall of the nation had once been the key problem of the historical science. This cannot be the right path of the historical science. At the present, it is thought that it is time the term of ‘nation’ to be duly deleted in history as our society has been rapidly changing into a multiracial society. The national history should be renamed as Korean history and take on universality and objectivity in respect of describing the history of human lives.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김경수, "치평요람에 관한 연구", 호서사학, 21(22) (1994)
  2. 김경현, "서양고대의 역사서술과 수사학", 한국사학사학보, 13 (2006)
  3. 金基鳳, "한국 근대 역사개념의 성립 ―‘국사’의 탄생과 신채호의 민족사학―", 韓國史學史學報, 12(12), pp.217~245 (2005), 한국사학사학회
  4. 김문식, "동국문헌비고‘예고’의 자료적 특징", 진단학보, 104 (2007)
  5. 김태영, "실학의 국가개혁론" (1998), 서울대출판부
  6. 노태돈, "5세기 금석문에 보이는 고구려인의 천하관", 한국사론, 19 (1988), 서울대교
  7. 박광용, "영조와 정조의 나라" (1998), 푸른역사
  8. 박인호, "조선후기역사지리학연구" (1996), 이회
  9. 변태섭, "고려사의 연구" (1982), 삼영사
  10. 오항령, "조선초기 『치평요람』 편찬배경과 성격", 한국사학사학보, 13 (2006)
  11. 이기백, "나의 역사연구", 한국사학사학보, 1 (2000)
  12. 이영훈, "수량경제사로 다시 본 조선후기" (2004), 서울대출판부
  13. 이윤갑, "한국역사학의 새로운 길 찾기-민족주의 역사학의 전망", 한국학논집, 35 (2007)
  14. 임지현, "한국사학계의 민족이해에 대한 비판적 조건", 역사비평, 26 (1994), 역사비평사간
  15. 정구복, "16-17세기의 사찬사서의 편찬에 대한 일고", 전북사학, 1 (1977)
  16. 정구복, "고려조의 편찬문화", 한국중세사학사, 1 (1999), 집문당
  17. 정구복, "세종의 역사인식", 한국중세사학사, 2 (2002), 경인문화사
  18. 정구복, "삼국사기의 현대적 이해" (2004), 서울대출판부
  19. 정구복, "조선후기 역사지리학의 발달", 한국실학사상연구, 1 (2006), 연세대학교 국학연구원
  20. 정구복, "조선후기 사학사의 성격", 한국사학사학보, 15 (2007)
  21. 조동걸, "현대한국사학사" (1998), 나남출판
  22. 조성을, "조선후기 사학사연구" (2004), 한울
  23. 차장섭, "이승휴, 문화관광부 2005년 10월의 인물" (2005)
  24. 한상권, "조선후기 사회와 訴寃제도" (1996), 일조각
  25. 한영우, "조선전기사학사연구" (1981), 서울대학교출판부
  26. 한영우, "조선후기사학사연구" (1989), 일지사
  27. 한영우, "역사학의 역사" (2002), 지식산업사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)