본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘객관적 상관물,’ ‘대상 a’ 그리고 ‘맥거핀’— 엘리엇, 라깡 그리고 히치콕

‘Objective Correlative,’ ‘Object a’ and ‘MacGuffin’: Eliot, Lacan and Hitchcock

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Challenging the assumptions which underlie Eliot’s understanding of Hamlet’s emotion as a failure, this paper problematizes the ‘objective correlative’ which has served as a touchstone of poetic Modernism and epitomized a major transformation from the romantic poetics of authorial self-expression to a new modernist poetics based on objectivity and impersonality. Why Eliot termed Hamlet an artistic failure instead of inheriting the tradition of the Romantic Hamlet from Schlegel to Freud can be newly discussed by locating and re-examining the ‘objective correlative’ in comparison with Hitchcock’s ‘MacGuffin’ and Lacan’s ‘object a.’ As is well known, ‘MacGuffin’ is the empty pretext which just serves to set a story in motion, but has no value in itself. If the alienation of subject into the symbolic order means to set a story of him or her in motion, ‘MacGuffin’ can be said to play a similar role with Lacan’s ‘object a’ which “takes the place of what the subject is symbolically deprived of” in that both of two indicate the lack of the Real and set in motion the symbolic movement at the same time. While claiming that Hamlet’s emotion is in excess of facts and lacking an objective correlative, Eliot tries to deny that there exists a void in the symbolic order or signification which “is inexpressible,” called ‘MacGuffin’ by Hitchcock or ‘object a’ by Lacan and escape from ‘the real’ of Hamlet or the world to secure a corner in the room and continue his fictive dominance over women or the world like ‘Prufrock.’ This can be why Eliot failed to see Hamlet as “the drama of an individual subjectivity.”

Abstract

Challenging the assumptions which underlie Eliot’s understanding of Hamlet’s emotion as a failure, this paper problematizes the ‘objective correlative’ which has served as a touchstone of poetic Modernism and epitomized a major transformation from the romantic poetics of authorial self-expression to a new modernist poetics based on objectivity and impersonality. Why Eliot termed Hamlet an artistic failure instead of inheriting the tradition of the Romantic Hamlet from Schlegel to Freud can be newly discussed by locating and re-examining the ‘objective correlative’ in comparison with Hitchcock’s ‘MacGuffin’ and Lacan’s ‘object a.’ As is well known, ‘MacGuffin’ is the empty pretext which just serves to set a story in motion, but has no value in itself. If the alienation of subject into the symbolic order means to set a story of him or her in motion, ‘MacGuffin’ can be said to play a similar role with Lacan’s ‘object a’ which “takes the place of what the subject is symbolically deprived of” in that both of two indicate the lack of the Real and set in motion the symbolic movement at the same time. While claiming that Hamlet’s emotion is in excess of facts and lacking an objective correlative, Eliot tries to deny that there exists a void in the symbolic order or signification which “is inexpressible,” called ‘MacGuffin’ by Hitchcock or ‘object a’ by Lacan and escape from ‘the real’ of Hamlet or the world to secure a corner in the room and continue his fictive dominance over women or the world like ‘Prufrock.’ This can be why Eliot failed to see Hamlet as “the drama of an individual subjectivity.”

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 패트릭 맥길리건, "히치콕: 서스펜스의 거장" (2006), 을유문화사
  2. 프랑수아 트뤼포, "히치콕과의 대화" (1994), 한나래
  3. Eliot, T. S., "Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot" (1975), A Harvest Book
  4. Frank, Armin paul, "T. S. Eliot’s Objective Correlative and the Philosophy of F. H. Bradley in: On T. S. Eliot’s Objective Correlative" (1994), Hanshin Publishing Co.
  5. Freud, Sigmund, "The Interpretation of Dreams" (1955), Basic Books
  6. Garber, Marjorie, "Hamlet: Giving up the Ghost in: Hamlet: A Case Study: Contemporary Criticism" (1994), Bedford Books
  7. Greenburg, Bradley, "T. S. Eliot’s Impudence: Hamlet, Objective Correlative, and Formulation.", Criticism, 49(2) (2007)
  8. Kerrigan, William, "Hamlet’s Perfection" (1994), The Johns Hopkins UP
  9. Lacan, Jacques, "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis" (1991), Penguin Books
  10. Lacan, Jacques, "Desire and the interpretation of Desire in Hamlet in: Literature and Psychoanalysis" (1982), Johns Hopkins UP
  11. Lyotard, Jeanp Franḉois, "Representation, Presentation, Unpresentable" (1991), Stanford UP
  12. Miller, J. Hillis, "Poets of Reality: Six Twentieth-Century Writers" (1966), Harvard UP
  13. Poirier, Richard, "The Renewal of Literature" (1987), Faber and Faber
  14. Schwartz, Sanford, "Beyond the “Objective Correlative”: Eliot and the Objectification of Emotion in: On T. S. Eliot’s Objective Correlative" (1994), Hanshin Publishing Co
  15. Williams, Carlos Williams, "Selected Essays of Williams Carlos Williams" (1954), Random House
  16. Wofford, Susanne L., "Hamlet: A Case Study in Contemporary Criticism" (1994), Bedford Books of St Martin’s Press
  17. Žižek, Slavoy, "Oragans without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences" (2004), Routledge
  18. Žižek, Slavoy, "The Sublime Object of Ideology" (1989), Verso

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)