Effects of ozone, ultraviolet and an organic acid-based disinfectant against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A good level of biosecurity practice is important for efficient porcine reproductive and respiratory syn-drome (PRRS) control. In the current study, disinfecting ability of ozone against PRRS virus (PRRSV) was evaluated in comparison with ultraviolet (UV) and an organic acid-based disinfectant to assess the possible use of ozone for disinfecting farm vehicles, equipments, and materials to reduce the risk of new virus introduction. For in vitro evaluation, the levels of infectious virus and viral RNA were de-termined on the swabs collected from the floor surface of each room treated with either ozone, UV or the disinfectant up to 30 min after contamination with 100 mL of VR2332 (105 TCID50/mL). For in vivo evaluation, 3, 4-week old, PRRS-free pigs were housed into those rooms right after the last swab collection. Then the pigs in each room were injected intramuscularly with the corresponding swab sam-ples collected at the last time point and pooled per each room. Although ozone, UV, and the disinfectant significantly reduced the levels of PRRSV RNA contamination, ozone was most effective in removing the viral RNA. In addition, the virus collected after at least 10 min exposure to ozone failed to replicate in pigs while the virus collected after treatment with UV and the disinfectant for 30 min still replicated in pigs. Based on the results, it was concluded that ozone is more effective in inactivating PRRSV as compared with UV and the organic acid-based disinfectant.
Abstract
A good level of biosecurity practice is important for efficient porcine reproductive and respiratory syn-drome (PRRS) control. In the current study, disinfecting ability of ozone against PRRS virus (PRRSV) was evaluated in comparison with ultraviolet (UV) and an organic acid-based disinfectant to assess the possible use of ozone for disinfecting farm vehicles, equipments, and materials to reduce the risk of new virus introduction. For in vitro evaluation, the levels of infectious virus and viral RNA were de-termined on the swabs collected from the floor surface of each room treated with either ozone, UV or the disinfectant up to 30 min after contamination with 100 mL of VR2332 (105 TCID50/mL). For in vivo evaluation, 3, 4-week old, PRRS-free pigs were housed into those rooms right after the last swab collection. Then the pigs in each room were injected intramuscularly with the corresponding swab sam-ples collected at the last time point and pooled per each room. Although ozone, UV, and the disinfectant significantly reduced the levels of PRRSV RNA contamination, ozone was most effective in removing the viral RNA. In addition, the virus collected after at least 10 min exposure to ozone failed to replicate in pigs while the virus collected after treatment with UV and the disinfectant for 30 min still replicated in pigs. Based on the results, it was concluded that ozone is more effective in inactivating PRRSV as compared with UV and the organic acid-based disinfectant.
참고문헌 (18)
- Alonso C, "Financial implications of installing air filtration systems to prevent PRRSV infection in large sow herds", Prev Vet Med, 1, pp.268~277 (2013)
- Bocci VA, "Scientific and medical aspects of ozone therapy. State of the art", Arch Med Res, 37, pp.425~435 (2006)
- Christopher-Hennings J, "Persistence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in serum and semen of adult boars", J Vet Diagn Invest, 7, pp.456~464 (1995)
- Cutler TD, "Effect of temperature and relative humidity on ultraviolet (UV 254) inactivation of airborne porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus", Vet Microbiol, 14, pp.47~52 (2012)
- Dee SA, "An assessment of sanitation protocols for commercial transport vehicles contaminated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus", Can J Vet Res, 68, pp.208~214 (2004)
- Dee SA, "Strategies to control PRRS: a summary of field and research experiences", Vet Microbiol, 55, pp.347~353 (1997)
- Dee SA, "An evaluation of ultraviolet light (UV254) as a means to inactivate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on common farm surfaces and materials", Vet Microbiol, 12, pp.96~99 (2011)
- Kim HS, "Enhanced replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in a homogeneous subpopulation of MA-104 cell line", Arch Virol, 133, pp.477~483 (1993)
- Kim WI, "Effect of genotypic and biotypic differences among PRRS viruses on the serologic assessment of pigs for virus infection", Vet Microbiol, 123, pp.1~14 (2007)
- Macauley JJ, "Disinfection of swine wastewater using chlorine, ultraviolet light and ozone", Water Res, 40, pp.2017~2026 (2006)
- Mohammadi Z, "A review of the properties and applications of ozone in endodontics: an update", Iran Endod J, 8, pp.40~43 (2013)
- Neumann EJ, "Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States", J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1, pp.385~392 (2005)
- Nieuwenhuis N, "Economic analysis of outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in nine sow herds", Vet Rec, 3, pp.225~ (2012)
- Otake S, "Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by needles", Vet Rec, 26, pp.114~115 (2002)
- Pejsak Z, "Clinical signs and economic losses caused by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a large breeding farm", Vet Microbiol, 55, pp.317~322 (1997)
- Sato H, "Virucidal effect of ozone treatment of laboratory animal viruses", Jikken Dobutsu, 39, pp.223~229 (1990)
- Shirai J, "Effects of chlorine, iodine, and quaternary ammonium compound disinfectants on several exotic disease viruses", J Vet Med Sci, 62, pp.85~92 (2000)
- Swenson SL, "Excretion of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in semen after experimentally induced infection in boars", J Am Vet Med Assoc, 15, pp.1943~1948 (1994)