본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회적 자본과 정부의 질이 주관적 웰빙에 미치는 영향 연구: 공공가치의 조절효과를 중심으로

The Empirical Study of the Effect of Social Capital and Government Quality on Citizen’s Subjective Well-Being: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Public Values

최영출|최예나
한국비교정부학회 (The Korean Association For Comparative Government)|2020.09|한국비교정부학보 (Korean Comparative Government Review)|제24권 제3호|pp. 325-352|DOI 10.18397/kcgr.2020.24.3.325

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

삶의 만족도Social CapitalLife Satisfaction사회적 자본주관적 웰빙Subjective Well-BeingPublic Value정부의 질공공가치Quality of Government
주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of social capital and government quality on citizen’s subjective well-being and the moderating effects of public values between them. (Design/methodology/approach) In this study, dependent variable was set as subjective well-being. And independent variables were social capital and the quality of government. Moderating variables were public values such as freedom and equality. Control variables were set as socio-demographic characteristics. (Findings) As a result of the analysis, it was found that first, in social capital, participation in group activities, respect for community interests and a sense of belonging to the region had positive effects on subjective well-being. Second, among the quality of government, service attitude of public officials and trust of the central government had positive effects on subjective well-being. Third, civic participation in community issues had a positive effect on life satisfaction. Fourth, freedom had a positive effect on subjective well-being and equality on life satisfaction. (Research implications or Originality) Policy implications are as follows. First, various group activities within the local community should be activated. And second, a sense of community should be increased by enhancing mutual communication, reciprocity and cooperation. Third, public officials must recognize public values clearly and provide public services friendly and promptly to the citizens. Fourth, the government must carry out its duties with integrity and increase citizens' trust in the government by preventing internal corruption.

Abstract

(Purpose) The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of social capital and government quality on citizen’s subjective well-being and the moderating effects of public values between them. (Design/methodology/approach) In this study, dependent variable was set as subjective well-being. And independent variables were social capital and the quality of government. Moderating variables were public values such as freedom and equality. Control variables were set as socio-demographic characteristics. (Findings) As a result of the analysis, it was found that first, in social capital, participation in group activities, respect for community interests and a sense of belonging to the region had positive effects on subjective well-being. Second, among the quality of government, service attitude of public officials and trust of the central government had positive effects on subjective well-being. Third, civic participation in community issues had a positive effect on life satisfaction. Fourth, freedom had a positive effect on subjective well-being and equality on life satisfaction. (Research implications or Originality) Policy implications are as follows. First, various group activities within the local community should be activated. And second, a sense of community should be increased by enhancing mutual communication, reciprocity and cooperation. Third, public officials must recognize public values clearly and provide public services friendly and promptly to the citizens. Fourth, the government must carry out its duties with integrity and increase citizens' trust in the government by preventing internal corruption.

참고문헌 (95)

  1. Balch, G. I., "Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept "Sense of Political Efficacy", Political Methodology, 1, pp.1~43 (1974)
  2. Becchetti, L., "When Money Does Not Buy Happiness: The Case of “Frustrated Achievers”", The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), pp.159~167 (2009)
  3. Berkman, L. F., "Social Epidemiology", pp.137~173 (2000), Oxford University Press
  4. Bjørnskov, C., "The Multiple Facets of Social Capital", European Journal of Political Economy, 22, pp.22~40 (2006)
  5. Bjørnskov, C., "Formal Institutions and Subjective Well-Being:Revisiting the Cross-Country Evidence", European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), pp.419~430 (2010)
  6. Hypertension and Happiness Across Nations, "Blanchflower D. G.", University of Warwick, ~ (2007)
  7. Bouckaert, G., "Potential for Comparative Public Opinion Research in Public Administration", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), pp.229~240 (2005)
  8. Bozeman, B., "Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism" (2007), Georgetown University Press
  9. Campbell, A., "The Voter Decides, Evanston, Illinois and White Plains" (1954), Row, Peterson and Company
  10. Chipuer, H. M., "Determinants of Subjective Quality of Life Among Rural Adolescents : A Developmental Perspective", Social Indicators Research, 61, pp.79~95 (2004)
  11. 최예나, "사회적 자본이 지방정부 신뢰에 미치는 영향 연구: 주민들과 선출직 기관들간 소통의 조절효과를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 20(3), pp.69~88 (2016), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  12. 최예나, "공공가치와 정부신뢰간 관계에 관한 실증적 연구: 정보비대칭성의 영향을 중심으로", 한국자치행정학보, 32(4), pp.105~127 (2018), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  13. 최예나, "사회적 자본이 사회적 경제조직 참여에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 민주주의 인식도와 제도적 소통의 조절효과를 중심으로", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 9(2), pp.1~32 (2019), 국제개발연구소
  14. 최예나, "친사회적 행동과 정부효능성이 시민들의 ODA 참여에 미치는 영향 연구 -거버넌스의 조절효과를 중심으로-", 한국자치행정학보, 34(2), pp.145~169 (2020), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  15. 최예나, "사회적 자본과 주민행복간 관계에 관한 연구 - 공동체의식의 조절효과를 중심으로 -", 한국지방자치학회보, 27(4), pp.53~78 (2015), 한국지방자치학회[DOI]
  16. Clark, A. E., "Unhappiness and Unemployment", Economic Journal, 104(424), pp.648~659 (1994)
  17. Coleman, J. S., "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.95~120 (1988)
  18. Craig, Stephen C., "Political Efficacy and Trust:A Report on the Nes Pilot Study Items", Political Behavior, 12, pp.289~314 (1990)
  19. Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being", Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), pp.542~575 (1984)
  20. Diener, E., "Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?", Social Indicators Research, 57(2), pp.119~169 (2002)
  21. Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being across Cultures" (2000), MIT Press
  22. Diener, E., "Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being", Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), pp.1~31 (2004)
  23. Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being:Three Decades of Progress", Psychological Bulletin, 125, pp.276~302 (1999)
  24. Dolan, P., "Do We Really Know What Makes Us Happy? A Review of the Economic Literature on the Factors Associated with Subjective Well-Being", Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, pp.94~122 (2008)
  25. Easterlin, R. A., "Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz", pp.89~125 (1974), Academic Press
  26. Easterlin, R. A., "Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, pp.35~47 (1995)
  27. Frey, B. S., "Happiness, Economy and Institutions", The Economic Journal, 110(466), pp.918~938 (2000)
  28. Fukuyama, F., "Trust: The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity" (1995), Basic Books
  29. Fukuyama, F., "Social Capital, Civil Society and Development", Third World Quarterly, 22, pp.7~20 (2001)
  30. Grootaert, C., "Understanding and Measuring Social Capital : A Multi-Disciplinary Tool for Practitioners" (2002), World Bank
  31. 한상일, "사회적 기업 인지도와 사회적 자본의 사회적 기업 신뢰에 대한 효과 분석", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 9(2), pp.33~56 (2019), 국제개발연구소
  32. Helliwell, J. F., "How’s Life? Combining Individual and National Variables to Explain Subjective Well-Being", Economic Modelling, 20, pp.331~360 (2003)
  33. Helliwell, J. F., "Well-Being, Social Capital, and Public Sector; What’s New?", The Economic Journal, 116, pp.34~45 (2006)
  34. Helliwell, J. F., "The Social Context of Well-Being", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 359, pp.1435~1446 (2004)
  35. Helliwell, J., "How’s Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being", British Journal of Political Science, 38, pp.595~619 (2008)
  36. How Much Is Social Capital Worth?, "Helliwell, J. F.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, No.w16025 (2010)
  37. Hetherington, M. J., "The Political Relevance of Political Trust", American Political Science Review, 92, pp.791~808 (1998)
  38. Holmberg, S., "Quality of Government: What You Get", Annual Review of Political Science, 12, pp.135~161 (2009)
  39. 홍경자, "사적 행복을 넘어 공적 행복으로: 정치적 자유와 행복", 철학논집, 45, pp.35~60 (2016), 철학연구소[DOI]
  40. Hooghe, M., "Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe. A Cross-National Multilevel Study", Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), pp.198~223 (2009)
  41. Hudson, J., "Institutional Trust and Subjective Well-Being across the EU", Kyklos, 59(1), pp.43~62 (2006)
  42. Inglehart, R., "Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective(1981-2007)", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), pp.264~285 (2008)
  43. Inglehart, R., "Culture and Subjective Well-Being", pp.165~183 (2000)
  44. 전승봉, "행복한 국가의 조건은 무엇인가: 거버넌스의 질, 신뢰, 평등, 그리고 보편적 복지제도를 중심으로", 비판사회정책, (58), pp.279~322 (2018), 비판과 대안을 위한 사회복지학회[DOI]
  45. 진재문, "노인차별에 대한 사회적 자본의 영향에 관한 연구 -공동체 의식의 매개효과를 중심으로-", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(2), pp.135~166 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
  46. 강순화, "메가이벤트 개최지의 사회자본과 사회적 가치, 공동체의식 및 협력의사 간의 영향관계 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 20(3), pp.147~171 (2016), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  47. Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2007, "Kaufmann, D.", World Bank Policy Research, ~, pp.Workingpaper No. 4654 (2007)
  48. Kaufmann, D., "The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues", Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), pp.220~246 (2011)
  49. Kawachi, I., "Social Capital, Income Inequality, and Mortality", American Journal of Public Health, 87(9), pp.1491~1498 (1997)
  50. 김이수, "정보화마을정책에서 주민참여의 효과성 연구 - 전라북도 정보화마을을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 28(3), pp.85~107 (2014), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  51. 김이수, "지방자치단체 주민들의 주관적 웰빙의 결정요인 연구 - 공동체 의식의 조절효과를 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 30(2), pp.157~180 (2016), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  52. 김선아, "OECD 국가의 행복 결정요인 규명에 관한 연구: 행복역량의 조절 효과를 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 22(1), pp.1~28 (2018), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  53. Knack, S., "Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States", American Journal of Political Science, 46, pp.772~785 (2002)
  54. 권인석, "공공가치의 체계적 연구를 위한 이론적 모형에 대한 시론", 한국공공관리학보, 32(3), pp.53~75 (2018), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
  55. La Porta, R., "The Quality of Government", The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 15(1), pp.222~279 (1999)
  56. Lane, R. E., "The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies" (2000), Yale University Press
  57. 이지희, "저소득층의 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인분석 -심리적 안녕감의 매개효과를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 21(2), pp.85~109 (2017), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  58. 이수형, "한국사회의 공동체정신 비교 분석: 향약과 두레, 새마을정신을 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 23(3), pp.113~134 (2019), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  59. Lelkes, O., "Knowing What Is Good for You. Empirical Analysis of Personal Preferences and the ‘‘Objective Good’’", The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, pp.285~307 (2006)
  60. Leung, A., "Searching for Happiness: The Importance of Social Capital", Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), pp.443~462 (2011)
  61. 임현철, "사회적 자본과 안전인식 그리고 개인 웰빙에 관한 실증연구", 한국행정연구, 28(4), pp.165~198 (2019), 한국행정연구원[DOI]
  62. Lucas, R., "Reexamining Adaptation and the Set Point Model of Happiness: Reactions to Changes in Marital Status", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), pp.527~539 (2003)
  63. Moore, M., "Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government" (1995), Harvard University Press
  64. Newton, K., "Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy", International Political Science Review, 22, pp.201~214 (2001)
  65. Noll, H. H., "Towards a European System of Social Indicators: Theoretical Framework and System Architecture", Social Indicators Research, 58, pp.47~87 (2002)
  66. 오영균, "Social Capital and Resident Happiness in Korea", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 9(3), pp.1~24 (2019), 국제개발연구소
  67. Olson, M., "The Rise and Decline of Nations—Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities" (1982), Yale University Press
  68. Oswald, A., "Happiness and Economic Performance", Economic Journal, 107(445), pp.1815~1831 (1997)
  69. Ott, J. C., "Good Governance and Happiness in Nations: Technical Quality Precedes Democracy and Quality Beats Size", Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), pp.353~368 (2010)
  70. Paldam, M., "Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement", Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, pp.629~653 (2000)
  71. 박종민, ""좋은 시민"과 "좋은 정부"", 정부학연구, 18(1), pp.3~22 (2012), 정부학연구소[DOI]
  72. Pichler, F., "Subjective Quality of Life of Young Europeans. Feeling Happy But Who Knows Why?", Social Indicators Research, 75, pp.419~444 (2006)
  73. Pretty, G. M. H., "Sense of Community and Its Relevance to Adolescents of All Ages", Journal of Community of Psychology, 24(4), pp.365~379 (1996)
  74. Prezza, M., "Sense of Community Referred to the Whole Town: Its Relations With Loneliness, Life Satisfaction, and Area of Residence", Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), pp.29~52 (2001)
  75. Putnam, R. D., "Making Democracy Work" (1993), Harvard University Press
  76. Putnam, R. D., "Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital", Journal of Democracy, 6, pp.65~78 (1995)
  77. Putnam, R. D., "Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community" (2000), Simon and Schuster
  78. Putnam, R. D., "Education, Diversity, Social Cohesion and ‘Social Capital’" (2004), OECD Education Ministers
  79. Putnam, R. D., "E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture", Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, pp.137~174 (2007)
  80. Putnam, R., "Democracies in Flux. The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society", pp.1~19 (2002), Oxford University Press
  81. Rice, T. W., "Social Capital and Government Performance in Iowa Communities", Journal of Urban Studies, 23, pp.375~389 (2001)
  82. Richardson, L., "Who Is Accountable in Localism?" (2013), AHRC
  83. Rothstein, B., "What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions", Governance, 21(2), pp.165~190 (2008)
  84. Ryan, R. M., "On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being", Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp.141~166 (2001)
  85. Quality of Government Makes People Happy, "Samanni, M.", 1421~1441, pp.The Quality of Government Institute Working Paper Series, 1 (2010)
  86. Sarracino, F., "Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being Trends: Comparing 11 Western European Countries", The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(4), pp.482~517 (2010)
  87. 신승배, "한국 청소년 삶의 질 결정요인", 사회과학연구, 29(1), pp.195~217 (2018), 사회과학연구소[DOI]
  88. Stokes, Donald E., "Ethics and Bigness a Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political, and Military" (1962), Harper and Brothers
  89. Tokuda, Y., "Individual and Country-Level Effects of Social Trust on Happiness: The Asia Barometer Survey", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(10), pp.2574~2593 (2010)
  90. Uslaner, E. M., "The Moral Foundation of Trust" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  91. Veenhoven, R., "Is Happiness a Trait? Tests of the Theory That a Better Society Does Not Make People any Happier", Social Indicators Research, 32(2), pp.101~160 (1994)
  92. Veenhoven, R., "Freedom and Happiness: Comparison of 126 Nations in 2006", Paper presented at Legatum Prosperity Workshop, pp.1~31 (2008)
  93. Veenhoven, R., "Livability of the Welfare State:Appreciation-of-Life and Length-of-Life in Nations Varying in State Welfare –effort", Social Indicators Research, 36, pp.1~48 (1995)
  94. Woolcock, M., "Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy", World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), pp.1~49 (2000)
  95. Survey on Community Well-being in Korea, "Community Wellbeing Research Center", ~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Social Capital, Basic Life Satisfaction and Happiness in Local Government: Focusing on Moderating Effects of Volunteering and Giving최예나(사)위기관리이론과실천 · Journal of Safety and Crisis Management2022 · 제12권 제1호사회자본과 삶의 질의 관계 - 개인의 사회자본적 속성과 주관적 측면에서의 삶의 질을 중심으로 -도수관한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2023 · 제37권 제4호사회적 자본이 주관적 웰빙에 미치는 영향분석: 포용성의 조절효과를 중심으로장현진, 최원우, 황희영한국행정연구원 · 한국행정연구2025 · 제34권 제3호지방행정서비스와 개인의 삶의 질에 관한 연구: 커뮤니티웰빙의 6개 자본요인의 매개효과를 중심으로서인석(재) 인천연구원 · 도시연구2017 · 제12호사회적 자본과 주민행복간 관계에 관한 연구 - 공동체의식의 조절효과를 중심으로 -김이수, 최예나한국지방자치학회 · 한국지방자치학회보2015 · 제27권 제4호충북지역 주민들의 관점에서 본 사회적 자본과 행정가치가 정부 신뢰에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구 - 청렴성과 민주성의 조절효과를 중심으로 -박봉규, 정태일, 최예나한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2020 · 제34권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

미국, 호주, 한국의 난민정책 비교 연구: 정책추진체계와 지원프로그램을 중심으로이광원, 권경득, 임동진pp. 1-37정부간 관계와 지방감사: OECD 국가 지방감사기구 비교분석양지숙pp. 39-63지방정부의 국정참여제도에 대한 비교 분석: 영국, 프랑스, 일본을 중심으로하혜수, 김철회pp. 65-92Development Aid from the Donor’s Point of View: An Institutional Analysis of British Aid to Statistics최동훈, 진유강pp. 93-128Welfare Magnets and In-migration: Do Welfare Magnets Work in Korean Local Governments?조근식, 서정욱pp. 129-151
원문 보기