본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정부-주민주도형 ICT를 활용한 스마트시티 리빙랩의 성과지표에 관한 연구: 경기도 고양시 화정2동 ICT 스마트리빙랩 실증사례를 중심으로

A Study on Performance Indicators of Resident Participatory Smart City Living Lab: Focusing on An Empirical Case of Living Lap in Hwajeong 2-dong, Goyang City

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) For sustained project management and evaluation of living lab, there is a need to utilize performance indicators considering characteristics of smart city living lab. This study was conducted to establish a system of performance indicators for evaluating performance of smart city living lab and apply this to an empirical case of a community-based living lab. (Design/methodology/approach) Performance indicators were extracted from a literature review and these were examined through an interview with the persons involved in the living lab, such as a group of experts, local residents and managers of public institutions. (Findings) Focusing on a logical structure consisting of an input, a process, an output and a result as a performance indicator case taking account of specificities of individual projects like a project goal, a project scale, a demonstration area and formation of diverse persons interested, twenty three performance indicators of smart city living lab from ten domains were developed. (Research implications or Originality) It is required to draw up independent performance indicators that can measure holistic values, such as citizen participation, local issue solving, service demonstration and implementation and realization of smart city, in order to evaluate diverse aspects of performance of smart city living lab quantitatively and qualitatively and acquire sustainability as a public project.

Abstract

(Purpose) For sustained project management and evaluation of living lab, there is a need to utilize performance indicators considering characteristics of smart city living lab. This study was conducted to establish a system of performance indicators for evaluating performance of smart city living lab and apply this to an empirical case of a community-based living lab. (Design/methodology/approach) Performance indicators were extracted from a literature review and these were examined through an interview with the persons involved in the living lab, such as a group of experts, local residents and managers of public institutions. (Findings) Focusing on a logical structure consisting of an input, a process, an output and a result as a performance indicator case taking account of specificities of individual projects like a project goal, a project scale, a demonstration area and formation of diverse persons interested, twenty three performance indicators of smart city living lab from ten domains were developed. (Research implications or Originality) It is required to draw up independent performance indicators that can measure holistic values, such as citizen participation, local issue solving, service demonstration and implementation and realization of smart city, in order to evaluate diverse aspects of performance of smart city living lab quantitatively and qualitatively and acquire sustainability as a public project.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Angelidou, M., "Smart City Policies : A Spatial Approach", Cities, 41, pp.S3~S11 (2014)
  2. Chang, Soo-Jung, "A Proposal of Smart Environment LTC Living Lab Model for Improving Pedestrian Safety", Conference of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (2020)
  3. Chang, Soo-Jung, "Requirement Analysis of ICT-Based Lighting Systems for Improving Pedestrian Safety", Conference of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (2020)
  4. Chourabi, H., "Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework", The 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (2012)
  5. Giffinger, R., "Smart Cities Ranking: an Effective Instrument for the Positioning of the Cities?", ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 4(12), pp.7~26 (2010)
  6. 황재영, "전력산업기반기금사업의 성과분석 및 평가체계에 관한 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 9(1), pp.15~38 (2005), 한국비교정부학회
  7. 김은지, "도시재생 리빙랩 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 한국지역개발학회지, 31(5), pp.17~44 (2019), 한국지역개발학회
  8. A Study on Strengthening the Foundation for the Performance Expansion of Social Problem Solving R&D Projects, "Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning", 1~280 (2017)
  9. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, "Guidelines for Operation and Management of Social Problem Solving R&D Projects", 1~98 (2017)
  10. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, "Standard Performance Indicators for National R&D Projects", 1~138 (2020)
  11. Lee, J. H., "Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities : Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, pp.80~99 (2014)
  12. 이재혁, "디지털 사회 혁신에서 리빙랩 프로젝트의 성과지표에 대한 연구", 한국IT서비스학회지, 18(5), pp.193~207 (2019), 한국IT서비스학회
  13. Exploring Science and Technology Policy Evaluation Models, "Lee, Myong-Hwa", Science & Technology Policy Institute, 1~128 (2017)
  14. 이면성, "스마트시티 실증 서비스 성과평가에 관한 연구", 한국통신학회논문지, 44(10), pp.1992~2002 (2019), 한국통신학회[DOI]
  15. Definition and Comment on the Performance Indicators of R&D Projects by the Ministry of Public Safety, "Ministry of Public Safety and Security", 1~43 (2017)
  16. Nam, T., "Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions", The 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (2011)
  17. 박준호, "시민참여형 스마트시티 리빙랩 활성화 방안 연구", 지역연구, 35(3), pp.33~44 (2019), 한국지역학회[DOI]
  18. Park, So-Im, "A Study on the Development Direction of the Living environment in a Post-Aged Society through Living-Lab", Conference of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (2017)
  19. 서준교, "지속가능한 도시개발로서 스마트도시의 개발을 위한 공간기준의 전략적 선택에 대한 탐색적 접근", 지방정부연구, 22(2), pp.303~339 (2018), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  20. Current Status of Korean Living Labs and Its Development Plan, "Seong, Ji-Eun", Science & Technology Policy Institute, 1~194 (2017)
  21. Seong, Ji-Eun, "The Operatig System and Case of Living Lab", STEPI Insight, 127, pp.1~46 (2013)
  22. Song, Wi-Chin, "Living Lab : User-led Open Innovation Model", Issues & Policy, 59, pp.1~14 (2012)
  23. 송위진, "리빙랩을 활용한 공공연구개발의 사업화 모델 도출", 기술혁신학회지, 20(2), pp.458~486 (2017), 한국기술혁신학회
  24. Self-evaluation Implementation Plan for 2020, "Statistics Korea", 1~82 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)