본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cutback Management, Fiscal Stability, and Fiscal Outcome

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) Decision makers attempt to adopt strategies in order to treat the sensitivity of state budgets and stabilize the budgets throughout changes in the business cycle. Particularly, during times of fiscal stress or scarcity, public organizations have faced the necessity of cutbacks and implemented cutback management. However, there is little research about the effectiveness of cutback management. Thus, this study examines the impact of cutback strategies on spending stability and budgetary prerformance by using the data set of U.S. state governments from 2001 to 2013. (Design/methodology/approach) In my analysis, the ordinary least squares (OLS) model with random effect are used to see how cutback management affects total expenditure volatility and fiscal outcomes. Further, interaction terms between cutback management and state government savings as well as between cutback management and fiscal severity are also included in the analysis. (Findings) I find that cutback management strategies result in negative budgetary performance, which indicates that they are not generally effective. However, targeted cuts play a role in stabilizing expenditures in the short-term. Interestingly, this study finds that cutback management shows different outcomes when the cutback strategies are implemented in different contexts in terms of reousrce levels and fiscal severity of state governments. (Research implication or originality) This study shows that implementation of cutback management needs to consider other conditions of the government such as resources (savings) when the cutback is employed. State with higher levels of savings should accompany either the across-the-board or the targeted cuts with spending stability. Moreover, this study suggests that governments need to consider fiscal severity when cutback management is employed. In addition, in terms of short-term fiscal outcomes, states with a high level of fiscal severity need to employ targeted cuts for improving fiscal outcomes, but states with a higher level of fiscal severity are encouraged to implement the across-the-board cuts for fiscal outcomes in the longer term.

Abstract

(Purpose) Decision makers attempt to adopt strategies in order to treat the sensitivity of state budgets and stabilize the budgets throughout changes in the business cycle. Particularly, during times of fiscal stress or scarcity, public organizations have faced the necessity of cutbacks and implemented cutback management. However, there is little research about the effectiveness of cutback management. Thus, this study examines the impact of cutback strategies on spending stability and budgetary prerformance by using the data set of U.S. state governments from 2001 to 2013. (Design/methodology/approach) In my analysis, the ordinary least squares (OLS) model with random effect are used to see how cutback management affects total expenditure volatility and fiscal outcomes. Further, interaction terms between cutback management and state government savings as well as between cutback management and fiscal severity are also included in the analysis. (Findings) I find that cutback management strategies result in negative budgetary performance, which indicates that they are not generally effective. However, targeted cuts play a role in stabilizing expenditures in the short-term. Interestingly, this study finds that cutback management shows different outcomes when the cutback strategies are implemented in different contexts in terms of reousrce levels and fiscal severity of state governments. (Research implication or originality) This study shows that implementation of cutback management needs to consider other conditions of the government such as resources (savings) when the cutback is employed. State with higher levels of savings should accompany either the across-the-board or the targeted cuts with spending stability. Moreover, this study suggests that governments need to consider fiscal severity when cutback management is employed. In addition, in terms of short-term fiscal outcomes, states with a high level of fiscal severity need to employ targeted cuts for improving fiscal outcomes, but states with a higher level of fiscal severity are encouraged to implement the across-the-board cuts for fiscal outcomes in the longer term.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Afonso, A., "Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth", European Journal of Political Economy, 26, pp.517~532 (2010)
  2. Alt, J. E., "Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States", American Political Science Review, 88(4), pp.811~828 (1994)
  3. Bartle, J. R, "Coping with cutbacks: City response to aid cuts in New York state", State & Local Government Review, 28(1), pp.38~48 (1996)
  4. Behn, R. D, "Leadership for cut-back management: the use of corporate strategy", Public Administration Review, 40(6), pp.613~620 (1980)
  5. Berne, R., "Cutback budgeting: The long‐term consequences", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4), pp.664~684 (1993)
  6. Biller, R. P, "Leadership tactics for retrenchment", Public Administration Review, 40(6), pp.604~609 (1980)
  7. Brooks, L., "An institutional explanation for the stickiness of federal grants", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(2), pp.243~264 (2010)
  8. Carroll, D. A., "Diversifying municipal government revenue structures:Fiscal illusion or instability?", Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(1), pp.27~48 (2009)
  9. "Is Local Government Heading for Broke?" (2013)[URL]
  10. Cepiku, D., "Local governments managing austerity: Approaches, determinants and impact", Public Administration, 94(1), pp.223~243 (2016)
  11. Chaney, B. A., "The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(4), pp.287~313 (2002)
  12. Dougherty, M. J., "Fiscal retrenchment in state budgeting: Revisiting cutback management in a new era", International Journal of Public Administration, 32(7), pp.593~619 (2009)
  13. Dunsire, A., "The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence", pp.175~203 (1991), University of Pittsburgh
  14. Dunsire, A., "Cutback Management in Public Bureaucracies. Popular Theories and Observed Outcomes in Whitehall" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  15. "Who pay the price for fiscal stress evidence from expenditure cutbacks in Florida counties" (2011)[URL]
  16. Fatás, A., "The macroeconomic effects of fiscal rules in the US states", Journal of Public Economics, 90(1), pp.101~117 (2006)
  17. Felix, R. A, "The growth and volatility of state tax revenue sources in the Tenth District", Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 93(3), pp.63~88 (2008)
  18. Glassberg, A, "Organizational responses to municipal budget decreases", Public Administration Review, 38(4), pp.325~332 (1978)
  19. Gramlich, E. M, "The 1991 state and local fiscal crisis", Brookings Papers Economic Activity, 1991(2), pp.249~275 (1991)
  20. Guo, H., "Fiscal Severity and the Choice of Budget Gap Closing Strategies", Public Money & Management, 38(4), pp.305~314 (2018)
  21. Hendrick, R., "Municipal Fiscal Policy Space and Fiscal Structure: Tools for Managing Spending Volatility", Public Budgeting &Finance, 34(3), pp.24~50 (2014)
  22. Hoover, G. A., "The political determinants of federal expenditure at the state level", Public Choice, 123(1-2), pp.95~113 (2005)
  23. Hou, Y., "A framework for understanding state balanced budget requirement systems: Reexamining distinctive features and an operational definition", Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(3), pp.22~45 (2006)
  24. Hou, Y., "Lost stability? Consumption taxes and the cyclical variability of state and local revenues" (2010), Ohio State University
  25. "Does Divided Government Impair Effective Response to Fiscal Shock?: An Empirical Analysis in Comparative Political Economy" (2009)[URL]
  26. Jordan, M. M, "Punctuations and agendas: A new look at local government budget expenditures", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(3), pp.345~360 (2003)
  27. Levine, C. H, "Organizational decline and cutback management", Public Administration Review, 38(4), pp.316~325 (1978)
  28. Levine, C. H., "Police management in the 1980s: From decrementalism to strategic thinking", Public administration review, 45, pp.691~700 (1985)
  29. Levine, C. H., "Resource scarcity and the reform model: the management of retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland", Public Administration Review, 41(6), pp.619~628 (1981)
  30. Lodge, M., "In to an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargain across OECD countries", Governance, 25(1), pp.79~101 (2012)
  31. National Association of Budget Officers (NASBO), "The Fiscal Survey of States: An Update of State Fiscal Conditions" (2009), NASBO
  32. National Association of Budget Officers (NASBO), "The Fiscal Survey of States: An Update of State Fiscal Conditions" (2013), NASBO
  33. Ojede, A., "Tax policy and state economic growth: The long-run and short-run of it", Economics Letters, 116(2), pp.161~165 (2012)
  34. Orszag, P., "Budget cuts vs. tax increases at the state level: Is one more counter-productive than the other during a recession" (2001), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
  35. "Managing Uncertainty: How State Budgeting Can Smooth Revenue Volatility" (2014)[URL]
  36. Posner, P. L., "The Politics of Fiscal Austerity:Democracies and Hard Choices", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(1), pp.141~174 (2013)
  37. Poterba, J. M, "State Responses to Fiscal Crises: The Effects of Budgetary Institutions and Politics", The Journal of Political Economy, 102(4), pp.799~821 (1994)
  38. Randma-Liiv, T, "Introduction to the Special Issue: The Impact of the Fiscal Crisis on Public Administration", Administrative Culture, 15(1), pp.4~9 (2014)
  39. Raudla, R., "Literature review on cutback management, COCOPS Work package 7, Deliverable 1: Coordinating for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future", ~ (2013)
  40. Rubin, I., "The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending, borrowing and balancing" (2005), CQ Press
  41. Rubin, M. M., "Financial Management Grades for the States: A Prospective Use", Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(1), pp.49~67 (2009)
  42. Savage, J. D., "Cutback budgeting. Handbook of Government Budgeting" (1999), Jossey-Bass Publishers
  43. Schunk, D., "Spending stabilization rules: A solution to recurring state budget crises?", Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(4), pp.105~124 (2005)
  44. Scorsone, E. A., "Fiscal Stress and Cutback Management Amongst State and Local Governments What Have We Learned and What Remains to Be Learned?", State and Local Government Review, 42(2), pp.176~187 (2010)
  45. White, F. C, "Trade-off in growth and stability in state taxes", National Tax Journal, 36(1), pp.103~114 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)