본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중소기업의 혁신지원정책에 대한 인식과 혁신 성공 경험이 정책만족도에 미치는 영향

The effects of innovation success experience and support policy demand on the innovation support policy satisfaction

김경아
한국비교정부학회 (The Korean Association For Comparative Government)|2021.06|한국비교정부학보 (Korean Comparative Government Review)|제25권 제2호|pp. 191-214|DOI 10.18397/kcgr.2021.25.2.191

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

중소기업 기술혁신정책만족도혁신지원정책혁신성공경험정책수요SMEs' innovation experienceSupport policy demandSatisfaction with innovation support policies
주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) This study examined the obstacles facing the innovation process, recognition of the need for support policies, and the innovation activities and capabilities of the firms, and the experience of innovation success as factors affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) satisfaction in the energy and related industrial technologies industries. (Design/methodology/approach) The two dependent variables are satisfaction with transparency in the policy review process and overall satisfaction with policies to support innovation. The samples of the empirical analysis are 1,827 SMEs belonging to energy and related industrial technologies (smart energy industries), and this study used “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Technology Survey” polling data for two years between 2018 and 2019 which is approved by the National Statistical Office. (Finding) The results of the analysis are as follows. First, most of the independent variables affect both satisfaction with the overall innovation support policy and transparency of the deliberation process. Second, the policy demand for innovation support policies has a positive effect on the direct funding in the commercialization stage, tax support, and personnel support for elementary and intermediate technology development stages. The bigger the obstacles, such as difficulty in securing manpower, lack of funds, and lack of technical information, the higher the satisfaction about the support policy. (Research implications or Originality) The main implication of this study is for the policymakers how they can review strategies to improve firm satisfaction with policies by encouraging and expanding the success experiences of small and medium-sized enterprises promoting innovation.

Abstract

(Purpose) This study examined the obstacles facing the innovation process, recognition of the need for support policies, and the innovation activities and capabilities of the firms, and the experience of innovation success as factors affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) satisfaction in the energy and related industrial technologies industries. (Design/methodology/approach) The two dependent variables are satisfaction with transparency in the policy review process and overall satisfaction with policies to support innovation. The samples of the empirical analysis are 1,827 SMEs belonging to energy and related industrial technologies (smart energy industries), and this study used “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Technology Survey” polling data for two years between 2018 and 2019 which is approved by the National Statistical Office. (Finding) The results of the analysis are as follows. First, most of the independent variables affect both satisfaction with the overall innovation support policy and transparency of the deliberation process. Second, the policy demand for innovation support policies has a positive effect on the direct funding in the commercialization stage, tax support, and personnel support for elementary and intermediate technology development stages. The bigger the obstacles, such as difficulty in securing manpower, lack of funds, and lack of technical information, the higher the satisfaction about the support policy. (Research implications or Originality) The main implication of this study is for the policymakers how they can review strategies to improve firm satisfaction with policies by encouraging and expanding the success experiences of small and medium-sized enterprises promoting innovation.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Afonso, A., "Macroeconomic Rates of Return of Public and Private Investment: Crowding‐In and Crowding‐Out Effects", Manchester School, 77(s1), pp.21~39 (2009)
  2. Ahmed, H., "Crowding‐out and crowding‐in effects of the components of government expenditure", Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(1), pp.124~133 (2000)
  3. Almeida, A., "From concept to policy : building regional innovation systems in follower regions", European Planning Studies, 19(7), pp.1331~1356 (2011)
  4. Crowding Out and Crowding in within Keynesian Framework. Do We Need Any New Empirical Research Concerning Them?, "Balcerzak, A. P.", Institute of Economic Research, ~, pp.No. 2 (2014), 2014
  5. A Study on the Analysis of Policy Effects of Government R&D Investment Support, "Choi, Dae-Seung", Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, ~ (2014)
  6. 최영출, "한국, 영국 및 아일랜드의 지역혁신체제의 네트워크 작동과정에 대한 비교연구", 한국비교정부학보, 10(2), pp.27~50 (2006), 한국비교정부학회
  7. Cohen, W. M., "Handbook of the Economics of Innovation" (2010), North Holland
  8. Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128~152 (1990)
  9. Friedman, B. M., "Crowding Out or Crowding In? Economic Consequences of Financing Government Deficits", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1978(3), pp.593~641 (1978)
  10. Funashima, Y., "Spatial crowding-out and crowding-in effects of government spending on the private sector in Japan", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 75, pp.35~48 (2019)
  11. Harris, R., "Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments", Oxford Economic Papers, 61(1), pp.74~103 (2009)
  12. Harris, R., "Models of regional growth: past, present and future", Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(5), pp.913~951 (2011)
  13. 홍성걸, "이명박 정부의 IT정책 추진체계: IT 컨트롤타워 설치 필요성과 효율적 운영을 위한 제언", 정보화정책, 16(4), pp.27~48 (2009), 한국지능정보사회진흥원
  14. 강석민, "기술개발에 대한 조세감면이 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 세무와 회계연구, 4(2), pp.223~247 (2015), 한국세무사회 부설 한국조세연구소[DOI]
  15. 김대진, "혁신형 제약기업 인증․지원 정책만족도에 대한 영향요인 연구 : 정책형성과정 변인을 중심으로", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 19(8), pp.360~369 (2018), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  16. 김재근, "중소기업 지원을 위한 테크노파크의 기능과 역할분석: 기업지원서비스에 대한 입주기업 만족도를 중심으로", 도시행정학보, 26(1), pp.1~28 (2013), 한국도시행정학회
  17. 김경아, "기술혁신 파트너와 외부지식의 특성이 서비스산업 기술혁신에 미치는 영향", 한국자치행정학보, 31(4), pp.387~404 (2017), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  18. 김경아, "기업이 직면한 시장경쟁환경에 따른 정부 기술혁신지원정책의 효과: 제조업 제품혁신을 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 23(4), pp.283~306 (2019), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  19. 김경아, "Negative Binomial Regression을 적용한 소재・부품・장비산업의 기술혁신성과에 대한 집적경제와 공급가치사슬의 영향 분석", 한국자치행정학보, 34(4), pp.493~514 (2020), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  20. 김경아, "소재･부품･장비 산업의 기술혁신성공에 대한 정부지원정책 및 일본과의 기술격차 조절효과", 한국거버넌스학회보, 27(3), pp.257~282 (2020), 한국거버넌스학회[DOI]
  21. 김승남, "벤처기업 지원의 성과가 기업의 기술수준 및 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 20(1), pp.325~341 (2007), 한국산업경제학회
  22. 고현수, "방산기업의 기술혁신 특성과 성공요인 그리고 정부지원효과에 관한 연구", 산업혁신연구, 31(1), pp.139~163 (2015), 산업개발연구소[DOI]
  23. 이춘우, "한국 중소기업 인력정책의 전개과정과 정책적 개선방향 및 과제", 중소기업연구, 35(3), pp.263~288 (2013), 한국중소기업학회
  24. 이형주, "중소기업 기술지원 프로그램의 만족도가 기술성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(7), pp.204~214 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  25. 이인우, "중소, 중견기업 기술혁신 지원사업의 지속성 분석：만족도와 향후이용의사, 추천의사 간 관계를 중심으로", 경영교육연구, 30(3), pp.111~132 (2015), 한국경영교육학회
  26. 이상천, "가족회사의 산학협력 프로그램 만족도 평가를 통한 성과 지향적 융복합 산학협력지원 프로그램 모형 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 13(5), pp.9~19 (2015), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  27. 이시원, "정부변동에 따른 정책변동의 사례분석: 고용노동부의 일자리창출 정책을 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 22(3), pp.293~319 (2018), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  28. 이선영, "정부지원 중소기업 기술협력사업의 성과판별 요인에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3), pp.664~688 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
  29. 이윤식, "이명박 정부의 국가정보화 기본계획 및 실행계획에 관한 비판적 검토", 한국지역정보화학회지, 12(4), pp.1~38 (2009), 한국지역정보화학회[DOI]
  30. "The OECD Innovation Strategy - 2015 revision" (2015)[URL]
  31. Changes in The Value Chain Of The Energy Industry according to The Diffusion of Intelligent Technology, "Park, Chan-Kook", Korea Energy Economics Institute, ~ (2019)
  32. 박지원, "공공R&D 이전기술의 사업화 성공요인 분석 및 성과제고 방안", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1), pp.28~48 (2015), 한국기술혁신학회
  33. 박상원, "중소기업지원 정책목표와 정책도구 간의 정합성 분석: 김대중, 노무현 및 이명박 정부 간 비교를 중심으로", 국정관리연구, 7(2), pp.111~143 (2012), 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원[DOI]
  34. 송위진, "사회·기술시스템론과 과학기술혁신정책", 기술혁신학회지, 16(1), pp.156~175 (2013), 한국기술혁신학회
  35. Korea’s Industrial Support Budget: Achievements and Policy Direction, "Song, Yeong-kwan", Korea Development Institute (KDI), ~, pp.Research Monograph, 3 (2017)
  36. Performance and Policy Implications of Energy Transition in Major Countries, "Yang, Eu-Seuk", Korea Energy Economics Institute, ~ (2019)
  37. Željko, M., "Crowding out vs. crowding in effects in transitional countries", Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business, PIEB, 15(4), pp.126~136 (2015)
  38. "Is the Moon Jae-in government shutting down its doors with ‘nuclear export’, which started with nuclear-phase-out policy?" (2021)[URL]
  39. "We will stop the hasty push to phase-out nuclear power: Establishment of the Energy Policy Rationalization Faculty Council" (2018)[URL]
  40. "When the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy phase out nuclear power… ‘Vice Minister of Energy sector’ was given to the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy" (2021)[URL]
  41. "The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea put an end to the nuclear-phase-out policy controversy: There is no problem in the policy establishment procedure" (2021)[URL]
  42. "Germany's renewable energy share has been increased to 33%, but the electricity cost is 1.3 million won per year, the highest in the world" (2019)[URL]
  43. "Pursuing both carbon-neutral and nuclear power plants is a myth: The National Assembly’s Carbon-Neutral Energy Policy Debate" (2021)[URL]
  44. "One year before the completion of the nuclear phase-outs policy… German auditor warns of power shortage" (2021)[URL]
  45. "Half Conclusion of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea: In effect, the Moon Jae-in government’s expeditionary policy was confirmed" (2020)[URL]
  46. "Innovation-Driven Growth Portal"[URL]
  47. Ministry of Economy and Finance, "Held the「The 18th Innovative Growth Strategy Review Meeting, Policy Review Meeting, Korean Version New Deal Review Prosecutor's Meeting, and 12th Vice Minister’s Meeting on Inflation Relations", ~ (2021)
  48. Support strategy for innovative Energy companies’ for vitalizing the new energy industry ecosystem, "Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy", ~ (2020)
  49. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Significant Expansion Of Investment In Renewable Energy, The Core Of The Green New Deal: 270 Billion Won In The Renewable Energy Sector Support Budget Through The 3Rd Supplementary Budget", ~ (2020)
  50. National Assembly Budget Office, "Analysis by Budget Committee for 2021: Science, ICT, Broadcasting, and Communications Committee", The National Assembly of The Republic of Korea, ~ (2020)
  51. National Assembly Budget Office, "Analysis by Budget Committee for 2021:Trade, Industry, Energy, SMEs, and Startups Committee", The National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, ~ (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

중소기업 기술혁신 지원사업의 성과평가지표에 대한 수요자 관점의 탐색적 연구박상문, 이종선경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2025 · 제16권 제3호기업이 직면한 시장경쟁환경에 따른 정부 기술혁신지원정책의 효과: 제조업 제품혁신을 중심으로김경아한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2019 · 제23권 제4호코로나19 환경에 있어서 서비스산업의 기술혁신 정책효과 연구정진우한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2023 · 제27권 제1호중소기업 DX에 대한 혁신지원정책의 영향 및 산업특성 조절효과김경아, 유원규한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2025 · 제29권 제2호중소기업에 대한 정부의 기술혁신지원정책은 다른 정책수단보다 효과적인가?: 메타분석을 통한 효과성 비교김주일, 원이중, 정근주국회예산정책처 · 예산정책연구2024 · 제13권 제3호중소기업 기술개발 및 혁신 촉진을 위한 최적의 정부지원 탐색 연구: 재정지원을 중심으로최종민지식경영연구원 · 기업과혁신연구2024 · 제47권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

The Effects of Local Variables on Economic Growth in Korea, 2010-2017김덕준pp. 1-23Cutback Management, Fiscal Stability, and Fiscal Outcome김성찬pp. 25-42정부결산에서 정책결산에 대한 미국, 영국, 한국의 비교연구유승원, 김수희pp. 43-62대학 국제연구협력 강화를 위한 대학교 국제연구협력 동향 분석노영희pp. 63-80공간적 구조에 따른 공공갈등의 영향범위 분석김강민pp. 81-111
원문 보기