본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북핵문제에 대한 ＂다른 선택들(Other Options)＂ -부시정부의 정책대안에 대한 이념형적 분석-

"Other Options" as to the N.Korean Nuclear Issue: An Ideal-Type Analysis on the Policy Alternatives of the Bush Administration

이재정
동아시아국제정치학회 (The East Asian Association Of International Studies (Eaais))|2005.06|국제정치연구 (THE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS)|제8권 제1호|pp. 207-236

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류정치외교학

초록

Abstract

North Koreans insisted in February 2005 that they had developed nuclear weapons to defend themselves from the American hostile policies, and declared that they would suspend their participation in the 6-way talk indefinitely. Bush administration in response announced that they were taking "other options" into consideration. This study analyzes what those "other options" are and what they could imply for us. First, it constructs an ideal-type for each of "all the options" that Bush administration may have, and then traces which options actually had been in use. Against these two backgrounds "other options" are brought into high relief.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Bancroft-Hinchey, "Rice’s Other Options", 23 (2005)
  2. BBC, "US General Warns of Forces Strain", 4 (2005)
  3. Brinkley, "Pressure on North Korea: U.S. Stealth Jets Sent to South", 30 (2005)
  4. Brownstein, "For Wary U.S. and Asia, North Korea Is ‘Land of Lousy Options’", 10 (2003)
  5. Bubnov, "Will U.S.A. Attack North Korea after Iraq?", 4 (2003)
  6. Bulychev, "A Long-Term Strategy for North Korea", 15 (2005)
  7. Burger, "Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation", Duke University Press
  8. Carpenter, "Options for Dealing with North Korea", 73 (2003)
  9. Clinton, "Bill Clinton Goes ‘On the Record’", 6 (2005)
  10. CNN, "Powell: North Korean Standoff ‘Not a Crisis’", 29 (2002)
  11. Crane, "A Regime Collapse Could Bring Chaos", 16 (2003)
  12. Daalder, "Why the U.S. Is Focusing on Iraq: Can U.S. Engage Pyongyang without Rewarding It?" (2003)
  13. Diamond, Andrew F, "Don’t Outsource North Korea Problem to China", 25 (2005)
  14. Dobbs, "For Wary White House, a Conflict, Not a Crisis", 29 (2002)
  15. Dunham, "U.S. Military Options for N. Korea Fraught with Peril", 25 (2003)
  16. Efron, "Bush Has His Reasons to Alter Tactics on N. Korea", 16 (2003)
  17. Elliot, "The Role of Economic Leverage in Negotiations with North Korea", 1 (2003), Institute for International Economics
  18. Faiola, "Despite U.S. Attempts, N. Korea Anything But Isolated", 12 (2005)
  19. Feinstein, "Date with a Dictator: Negotiating with North Korea is an unattractive Optionbut the Only Good One", 17 (2003)
  20. Friedman, Thomas L, "Brussels Sprouts", 11 (2005)
  21. Gordon, "Warnings Go Unheeded over North Korea Threat", 7 (2004)
  22. Grier, "U.S. Options in the North Korea Stand-off", 16 (2005)
  23. Harrison, "Getting Around Pyongyang's Hard-Liners", 10 (2005)
  24. Hersh, "The Coming Wars", 24 (2005)
  25. Herskovitz, "Korea Seen Buying Times On Nuclear Talks-Analysts", 8 (2005)
  26. Huus, "U.S. Weighs Grim N. Koera Options", 16 (2003)
  27. Kaplan, "The Unspeakable Truth", 7 (2003)
  28. "It’s Time to Talk to Pyongyang", 11 (2005)
  29. Karasaki, "Japan, U.S. to Mull Strategy on N. Korea", 19 (2005)
  30. Kessler, "Rice: U.S. and Allies Discussed ‘Options’ Against N. Korea", 22 (2005)
  31. Kimball, "Is Bush Trying Out the Madman Theory?", 28 (2005)
  32. Kirk, "North Korea Missile Test Tied to U.S. Snub", 12 (2003)
  33. Kissinger, "The Six-Power Route to Resolution", 18 (2003)
  34. Knowlton, "2 Key Senators Assail U.S. Policy on Korea", 15 (2005)
  35. Korb, "Bush Doctrine Flunks Test on North Korea", 25 (2003)
  36. Kristol, "Lessons of a Nuclear North korea", 28 (2002)
  37. Lake, Anthony, "Negotiating with Nuclear North Korea", 6 (2002)
  38. Laney, "How to Deal With North Korea" (2003)
  39. Marshall, "The Option of Last Resort" (2004)
  40. Menon, "What Are We to Do About North Korea?", 8 (2003)
  41. Park, "North Korean Perceptions of Self and Others: Implications for Policy Choices", 73(4) (2002)
  42. Plate, "Why War in Korea Is Less Probable Now?", 21
  43. Richter, "In a Military Stronghold, a War Hawk Circles Back", 19 (2005)
  44. Sanger, "U.S. Aides Split as Change Is Seen in Korean Threat", 11 (2003)
  45. Sanger, "What Are Koreans Up To? U.S. Agencies Can’t Agree", 12 (2005)
  46. Saunders, "Military Options for Dealing with North Korea’s Nuclear Program", 29 (2003)
  47. Slavin, "Word Choice is a Lesson in ‘Crisis’ Management", 25 (2003)
  48. Smith, "North Korea Deal Urged by State Dept", 15 (1993)
  49. Snyder, "North Korea: False Steps in Beijing", 23 (2003)
  50. Stossel, Scott, "North Korea: the War Game" (2005)
  51. The Associated Press, "Cheney: China Key to Ending N. Korea Nukes", 29 (2005)
  52. The Los Angeles Times, "Editorial＂China’s Whip Hand", 13 (2005)
  53. The Pravda, "Attempts to Isolate North Korea Will Escalate Tensions on Korean Peninsula", 30 (2002)
  54. Burger, "Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation" (1987), Duke University Press
  55. Tisdall, "Missile Defense Casts Cloud over Korean Sunshine", 3 (2001)
  56. Wendt, "Constructing International Politics", 20(1), pp.71~81 (1995)
  57. White, "Wars Strain U.S. Military Capability, Pentagon Reports", 3 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

선거제도의 개혁 방향에 대한 연구 -자유로운 참여, 형평성, 합리성의 보장이라는 관점에서-이재정동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2005 · 제8권 제1호부시 정부와 한반도:＂무엇을 할 것인가?＂박건영극동문제연구소 · 한국과 국제정치2001 · 제17권 제1호미국 부시 행정부의 대북정책이성철,오일환아태지역연구센터 · 중소연구2002 · 제26권 제1호위기의 한반도와 전쟁과의 단절정태욱민주주의법학연구회 · 민주법학2004 · 제0권 제25호北核협상을 통해 본 미국의 對北정책: 제4차 6자회담을 중심으로홍관희동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2005 · 제8권 제2호A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROK-US COALITION REGARDING NORTH KOREA'S NUCLEAR ISSUEJEONG WOO KIL통일연구원 · International Journal of Korean Unification Studies1994 · 제3권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

탈냉전, 세계화, 탈근대 시대의 국제관계학 -대상과 방법의 재구성구갑우, 함택영, 백창재pp. 1-39세계화 개념의 정치경제학적 이해구춘권pp. 41-65세계화와 노동의 미래김인춘, 김학노pp. 67-91오존층 보호 레짐의 성과와 한계신연재pp. 93-137영국 노사관계의 변화연구 : 제3의 길과 신노조주의의 등장을 중심으로유현석pp. 139-165
원문 보기