본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Failure of Hegemonic Masculinity in the Romantic Gothic Dramas: Remorse, Manfred, and The Cenci

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The aim of this study is to examine the theme of the failure of hegemonic masculinity in Romantic Gothic dramas: Remorse (1813), Manfred (1816-1817), and The Cenci (1819). I will work from Coleridge, Byron, and Shelley’s major Gothic dramas written after the French Revolution as a way of investigating how the flaws of hegemonic masculinity are delineated and developed in order to redefine a new type of romantic masculinity. Male characters embodying traditional masculinity are represented as violent, vile, and even corrupt figures in Romantic Gothic dramas. These antagonists commit anti-ethical behavior without any sense of compunction, which shows the corruption of male power. These three Romantic Gothic dramas reflect the moral flaws of the male characters which lead to their demise. These moral flaws arise from their corrupt and aristocratic power, which they attempt to use to dominate the world. Against this backdrop of idealized femininity, oppressive masculinity is revealed as corrupt. For the Romantic poets, it was necessary to redefine idealized masculinity as a way to overcome their sense of destroyed illusions in reality. Idealized masculinity is related to the image of androgyny, which contains both masculine and feminine qualities in unity. This concept of androgyny comes from Plato’s Symposium. It is a “communitarian symbol of human interconnection” (Andrews 120 Chung Eun Lee 442). This study of these dramas in terms of the failure of hegemonic masculinity not only exposes the poets’ radical visions for an ideal society, but also reveals their sense of despair and frustration resulting from the gap between the ideal and reality.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the theme of the failure of hegemonic masculinity in Romantic Gothic dramas: Remorse (1813), Manfred (1816-1817), and The Cenci (1819). I will work from Coleridge, Byron, and Shelley’s major Gothic dramas written after the French Revolution as a way of investigating how the flaws of hegemonic masculinity are delineated and developed in order to redefine a new type of romantic masculinity. Male characters embodying traditional masculinity are represented as violent, vile, and even corrupt figures in Romantic Gothic dramas. These antagonists commit anti-ethical behavior without any sense of compunction, which shows the corruption of male power. These three Romantic Gothic dramas reflect the moral flaws of the male characters which lead to their demise. These moral flaws arise from their corrupt and aristocratic power, which they attempt to use to dominate the world. Against this backdrop of idealized femininity, oppressive masculinity is revealed as corrupt. For the Romantic poets, it was necessary to redefine idealized masculinity as a way to overcome their sense of destroyed illusions in reality. Idealized masculinity is related to the image of androgyny, which contains both masculine and feminine qualities in unity. This concept of androgyny comes from Plato’s Symposium. It is a “communitarian symbol of human interconnection” (Andrews 120 Chung Eun Lee 442). This study of these dramas in terms of the failure of hegemonic masculinity not only exposes the poets’ radical visions for an ideal society, but also reveals their sense of despair and frustration resulting from the gap between the ideal and reality.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. An, Young Ok, "Byron and the Politics of Freedom and Terror", pp.102~117 (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
  2. Andrews, Naomi J., "Utopian Androgyny: Romantic Socialists Confront Individualism in July Monarchy France", French Historical Studies, 26(3), pp.437~457 (2003)
  3. Bone, Drummond, "Byron: Wrath and Rhyme", pp.166~185 (1983), Vision P
  4. Bruhm, Steven, "Gothic Bodies: The Politics of Pain in Romantic Fiction" (1990), U of Pennsylvania P
  5. Bruhn, Mark J., "Prodigious mixtures and confusions strange’: The Self-Subverting Mixed Style of The Cenci", Poetics Today, 22, pp.713~763 (2001)
  6. Carlson, Julie A., "In the Theater of Romanticism: Coleridge, Nationalism, Women" (1994), Cambridge UP
  7. Cox, Jeffrey N., "The Oxford Handbook of the Georgian Theater 1737-1832", pp.407~423 (2014), Oxford UP
  8. Curran, Stuart, "Shelley’s Cenci: Scorpions Ringed with Fire" (1970), Princeton UP
  9. Eggenschwiler, David, "The Tragic and Comic Rhythms of ‘Manfred", Studies in Romanticism, 13, pp.63~77 (1974)
  10. Erving, George, "The Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge", pp.392~411 (2009), Oxford UP
  11. Ferriss, Suzanne, "Reflection in ‘Many-Sided Mirror’: Shelley’s The Cenci through the Post-Revolutionary Prism", Interdisciplinary Nineteenth-Century Studies, 15, pp.161~170 (1991)
  12. Franklin, Caroline, "Byron’s Heroines" (1992), Carendon P
  13. Hall, Jean, "The Socialized Imagination: Shelley’s ‘The Cenci and Prometheus Unbound", Studies in Romanticism, 23, pp.339~350 (1984)
  14. Holmes, Richard, "Shelley: The Pursuit" (1974), Review Books
  15. Jewett, William, "Fatal Autonomy: Romantic Drama and The Rhetoric of Agency" (1997), Cornell UP
  16. Marchand, Leslie A., "Byron: A Portrait" (1970), Alfred A. Knopf
  17. McGann, Jerome J., "Byron and Romanticism" (2002), Cambridge UP
  18. McGann, Jerome J., "The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation" (1983), U of Chicago P
  19. Melaney, William, "Ambiguous Difference: Ethical Concern in Byron’s ‘Manfred’", New Literary History, 36, pp.461~475 (2005)
  20. Milne, Fred, "Shelley’s The Cenci: The Ice Motif and the Ninth Circle of Dante’s Hell", Tennessee Studies in Literature, 22, pp.117~132 (1972)
  21. Moore, John David, "Coleridge and the ‘Modern Jacobinical Drama’: Osorio, Remorse, and the Development of Coleridge’s Critique of the Stage, 1797-1816", Bulletin of Research in the Humanities, 85, pp.443~464 (1982)
  22. Morrow, John, "Coleridge’s Political Thought: Property, Morality and the Limits of Traditional Discourse" (1990), Palgrave Macmillan
  23. Mortensen, Peter, "European Gothic: A Spirited Exchange, 1760-1960", pp.128~146 (2002), Manchester UP
  24. Munro, Barbara Haas, "A Study of Tyranny: In the Closet Drama of the Romantics", pp.1967
  25. Saggini, Francesca, "The Gothic Novel and the Stage: Romantic Appropriations" (2015), Taylor & Francis
  26. Saglia, Diego, "Poetic Castles in Spain: British Romanticism and Figurations of Iberia" (2000), Rodopi
  27. Scrivener, Michael Henry, "Radical Shelley: The Philosophical Anarchism and Utopian Thought of Percy Bysshe Shelley" (1982), Princeton UP
  28. Sheley, Erin, "’Demolished Worlds’: Manfred and Sublime (Un)burial", The Byron Journal, 40, pp.51~58 (2012)
  29. Shelley, Percy Bysshe, "A Philosophical View of Reform" (1920), Oxford UP
  30. Stansbury, Heather, "Bound By Blood: Incestuous Desire in the Works of Byron", The Byron Journal, 40, pp.17~28 (2012)
  31. Stelzig, Eugene, "’Though It Were the Deadliest Sin to Love as We Have Love’: The Romantic Idealization of Incest", European Romantic Review, 5(2), pp.230~251 (1995)
  32. Tomko, Michael, "British Romanticism and the Catholic Question: Religious, History and National Identity, 1778-1829" (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
  33. Trueblood, Paul Graham, "Byron’s Political and Cultural Influence in Nineteenth-Century Europe: A Symposium", pp.191~204 (1981), Macmillan
  34. Valladares, Susan, "Romanticism and the Anglo-Hispanic Imaginary", pp.133~155 (2010), Rodopi
  35. Watkins, Daniel P., "A Materialist Critique of English Romantic Drama" (1952), UP of Florida
  36. Weinberg, Alan, "Religion and Patriarchy in Shelley’s The Cenci", Unisa English Studies, 28, pp.5~13 (1990)
  37. White, Harry, "Beatrice Cenci and Shelley’s Avenger", Essays in Literature, 5, pp.27~38 (1978)
  38. Wyse, Bruce David, "Repetition, Genre and Excess in Romantic Closet Tragedy: The Borderers, Remorse and Manfred", pp.1992

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)