Prospect of Multilateral Security Governance in East Asia
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The interest in cooperative governance in security area is growing because the concept of security has extended in its content and range. The meaning of security is getting comprehensive including non-traditional threats such as economic crisis, human rights violations, terrors, environmental issues, maritime security, natural disaster, etc. The discussions on cooperative governance are heating up in East Asia, especially in Northeast Asia because this region has faced various security challenges for several decades. European case of multilateral security cooperation, especially OSCE (CSCE), provides a role model of cooperative governance in East Asia. The future efforts to build multilateral security cooperation system or CBMs should be comprehensive in its issue area and inclusive in its geographic range. Even though the multilateral cooperation system begins through bilateral efforts to build trusts and transparency, it should include more players around this region. The existence of neutral parties would precipitate the CBM process by mediating conflicting parties. The issues dealt with in the process should also be comprehensive, so that the negotiations can be facilitated by linking many different issues among the participating countries.
Abstract
The interest in cooperative governance in security area is growing because the concept of security has extended in its content and range. The meaning of security is getting comprehensive including non-traditional threats such as economic crisis, human rights violations, terrors, environmental issues, maritime security, natural disaster, etc. The discussions on cooperative governance are heating up in East Asia, especially in Northeast Asia because this region has faced various security challenges for several decades. European case of multilateral security cooperation, especially OSCE (CSCE), provides a role model of cooperative governance in East Asia. The future efforts to build multilateral security cooperation system or CBMs should be comprehensive in its issue area and inclusive in its geographic range. Even though the multilateral cooperation system begins through bilateral efforts to build trusts and transparency, it should include more players around this region. The existence of neutral parties would precipitate the CBM process by mediating conflicting parties. The issues dealt with in the process should also be comprehensive, so that the negotiations can be facilitated by linking many different issues among the participating countries.
참고문헌 (23)
- Acharya, Amitav A, "Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia : ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order" (2001), Routledge
- Acharya, Amitav, "Ideas, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the ‘ASEAN WAY’ to the ‘Asia-Pacific Way’", The Pacific Review, 10(3) (1997)
- Adler, Emanuel, "Security Communities" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Alberque, William, "The Role of Political-Military Confidence and Security Building in the Northeast Asia Peace and Cooperation Initiative", presented paper in Northeast Asia Peach and Cooperation Initiative (2015)
- Deutsch, Karl W, "Security Communities, International Politics and Foreign Policy" (1961), New York Free Press
- European Commission, "The European Union’s Role in Promoting Human Rights and Democratisation in Third Countries", COM(2001) 252 final. 8th May 2001, ~ (2001)
- Foot, Rosemary, "Regionalism in World Politics" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Hammes, T., "War evolves into the fourth generation", Contemporary Security Policy, 26(2) (2005)
- Higgot, Richard, "European Union and New Regionalism" (2007), Ashgate Publishing
- Jachtenfuchs, Markus, "European Integration Theory" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Jeong, Hanbeom., "Research Society for Military Studies" (2016), Theory of National Security
- Keohane, Robert O., "Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance" (2003), Polity Press
- 김남국, "The Democratic Empire of the European Union: A Normative Leader or a Realistic Compromiser?", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 23(4), pp.537~555 (2011), 한국국방연구원
- Kim, Samuel S., "North Korea and Northeast Asia" (2002), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
- Manners, Ian, "Normative Power Europe. A Contradiction in Terms?", Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2) (2002)
- Manners, Ian, "The Concept of Normative Power in World Politics" (2009), Danish Institute for International Studies
- Mautner-Markhof, Frances, "Security Co-operation in Northeast Asia: The Relevance of Europe’s Experience", Global Asia, 6(4) (2011)
- Park, Hahnkyu, "Constructing ‘positive’ Regional Identity: A Challenge for Multilateral Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia", Asia-Pacific Research, 11(1) (2004)
- Prodi, R., "2000-2005: Shaping the New Europe" (2000), Speech to the European Parliament
- Raymund Jose G. Quilop, "Building a Security Community in Northeast Asia: Options and Challenges", International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 18(2), pp.121~149 (2009), 통일연구원
- Smith, K., "Ethics and Foreign Policy" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Smith, K., "New Regionalism and Modes of Governance - Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America", European Journal of International Relation, 10(4) (2004)
- Tusicisny, Andrej, "Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously", International Political Science Review, 28(4) (2007)