한국어의 탈지역과 한국적 이산의 미학
Displacement of the Korean Language and the Aesthetics of the Korean Diaspora
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea has persisted in the notion of “ethnic nationalism.” That is “one race, one people, one language” as a homogeneous entity. This social ideal of unity prevails, even in overseas Korean communities formed by voluntary and involuntary displacement in the turmoil of modern history: communities made intermittent with the Japanese colonial occupation and with postcolonial encounters with the West. Given that the Korean people suffered from the trauma of deprivation of the language caused by the loss of the nation, nation has been equated with the language. Accordingly, “these bearers of a homeland” are also firm Korean language holders. The linguistic patriotism of unity based on the intertwining of “mother tongue” and “father country” has become prevalent in the collective memory of the people of the Korean diaspora. Korean American literature has grappled with this concept of the national history of Korea and the Korean language. The aesthetics of Korean American literature has been marked by an influx of literary resources of ‘Korea’ in sensibilities and structure of feelings; Korean myth, folk lore, songs, humor, traditional stories, manners, customs and historic moments. An experimental use of the Korean alphabet, Hangeul, written down as pronounced, provides an ethnic flavor in the midst of the English texts. Despite its national framework of mind, however, Korean American literature as an interstitial art reveals a keen awareness of inbetweenness, and transnational hybrid identities. By exploring the complex interrelationships of cultural and linguistic boundary-crossing practices in Korean American literature, this paper argues that the poetics of the Korean diaspora challenges the closed structure of identity formation, and offers a transnational sphere to deconstruct a rigidly demarcated national ideology of “one race, one people, one language,” for the world literary history.
Abstract
Korea has persisted in the notion of “ethnic nationalism.” That is “one race, one people, one language” as a homogeneous entity. This social ideal of unity prevails, even in overseas Korean communities formed by voluntary and involuntary displacement in the turmoil of modern history: communities made intermittent with the Japanese colonial occupation and with postcolonial encounters with the West. Given that the Korean people suffered from the trauma of deprivation of the language caused by the loss of the nation, nation has been equated with the language. Accordingly, “these bearers of a homeland” are also firm Korean language holders. The linguistic patriotism of unity based on the intertwining of “mother tongue” and “father country” has become prevalent in the collective memory of the people of the Korean diaspora. Korean American literature has grappled with this concept of the national history of Korea and the Korean language. The aesthetics of Korean American literature has been marked by an influx of literary resources of ‘Korea’ in sensibilities and structure of feelings; Korean myth, folk lore, songs, humor, traditional stories, manners, customs and historic moments. An experimental use of the Korean alphabet, Hangeul, written down as pronounced, provides an ethnic flavor in the midst of the English texts. Despite its national framework of mind, however, Korean American literature as an interstitial art reveals a keen awareness of inbetweenness, and transnational hybrid identities. By exploring the complex interrelationships of cultural and linguistic boundary-crossing practices in Korean American literature, this paper argues that the poetics of the Korean diaspora challenges the closed structure of identity formation, and offers a transnational sphere to deconstruct a rigidly demarcated national ideology of “one race, one people, one language,” for the world literary history.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김준오, "한국 문학과 정신분석·수용사적 검토와 그 전망", 현대시 사상, (겨울), pp.79~92 (1989), 고려원
- 도정일, "무의식과 욕망·프로이트와 라깡의 경우", 문화 과학, 3(봄), pp.97~119 (1993), 문화 과학사
- 박찬부, "프로이트와 라깡의 정신분석학", 성곡 논총, 22, pp.1709~1744 (1991)
- Archard,David, "Consciousness and the Unconscious" (1984), Open Court
- Derrida, Jacques, "The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond" (1987), Chicago UP
- Eagleton,Terry, "Literary Theory:An Introduction" (1983), U of Minnesota P
- Felman, Shoshana, "To Open the Question Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of Reading: Otherwise", pp.5~10 (1982), Johns Hopkins UP
- Freud, Sigmund, "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 24 Vols" (1958), Hogarth P
- Derrida, "Saving the Text:Literature", pp.Johns Hopkins UP, Philosophy
- Holland,Norman N, "The Dynamics of Literary Response" (1968), W.W.Norton
- "Holland Poems in Persons. New York: W. W. Norton", ~ (1973)
- Jakobson, Roman, "Language in Literature" (1987), Harvard UP
- Johnson,Barbara, "The Critical Difference: Essay in Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading" (1980), Johns Hopkins UP
- Lacan, Jacques, "Seminar on The Purloined Letter", pp.34~72 (1972), Yale French Studies
- Lacan, "E큓rits: A Selection" (1977), W.W.Norton
- Lacan, "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" (1977), W.W.Norton
- Laplanche, Jean, "The Unconscious: a psychoanalytic study", pp.118~75 (1972), Yale French Studies 48
- Trilling, Lionel, "Freud and Literature Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays", pp.95~111 (1981), Prentice-Hall
