본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국의 로맨스 소설과 프래그머티즘 철학과의 연속성에 관한 고찰—허먼 멜빌의『모비딕』을 중심으로

A Study of the Continuity Between the American Romance Novel and American Pragmatism: A Reading of Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This essay attempts to read Melville’s Moby-Dick as a prefiguration of American pragmatism, especially Jamesian version of it. Underlying this project is the assumption that the American Romance and James’s pragmatism partake in the enduring tradition of American thoughts and imagination. Despite the commonality in their roots, the continuity between these two products of American culture has received few critical assessments. The American Romance has rarely been discussed in terms of American pragmatism in part because critics have tended to narrowly define the latter as a kind of relativistic philosophy equivalent to practical instrumentalism, political realism and romantic utilitarianism. Consequently, they have favored literary works in the realistic tradition for their textual analyses, while eschewing a more imaginative genre like the American Romance. My contention is that James’s version of pragmatism is a future oriented pluralism which is unable to dispense with the power of imagination and the talent for seeing unforeseen possibilities inherent in nature and culture. James’s pragmatism is in tune with the American Romance in that it savours the attractions of alternative possibilities created by the genre in which the imaginary world is imbued with the actual one. The pragmatic impulse in Moby-Dick finds its finest expression in the words and acts of Ishmael. Through this protean narrator, Melville renders the text of Moby-Dick symbolic,fragmentary and thereby pluralistic in its meaning. With his rhetoric of incompletion and by refraining from totalizing what he experiences, Ishmael shuns finality in truth and entices the reader to join his intellectual journey with a non-foundational notion of truth and meaning in view. Ishmael also envisages pragmatists' beliefs that experience is fluid in nature and the universe is in a constant state of becoming. Yet Ishmael as the narrator of Moby-Dick is more functional than foundational.

Abstract

This essay attempts to read Melville’s Moby-Dick as a prefiguration of American pragmatism, especially Jamesian version of it. Underlying this project is the assumption that the American Romance and James’s pragmatism partake in the enduring tradition of American thoughts and imagination. Despite the commonality in their roots, the continuity between these two products of American culture has received few critical assessments. The American Romance has rarely been discussed in terms of American pragmatism in part because critics have tended to narrowly define the latter as a kind of relativistic philosophy equivalent to practical instrumentalism, political realism and romantic utilitarianism. Consequently, they have favored literary works in the realistic tradition for their textual analyses, while eschewing a more imaginative genre like the American Romance. My contention is that James’s version of pragmatism is a future oriented pluralism which is unable to dispense with the power of imagination and the talent for seeing unforeseen possibilities inherent in nature and culture. James’s pragmatism is in tune with the American Romance in that it savours the attractions of alternative possibilities created by the genre in which the imaginary world is imbued with the actual one. The pragmatic impulse in Moby-Dick finds its finest expression in the words and acts of Ishmael. Through this protean narrator, Melville renders the text of Moby-Dick symbolic,fragmentary and thereby pluralistic in its meaning. With his rhetoric of incompletion and by refraining from totalizing what he experiences, Ishmael shuns finality in truth and entices the reader to join his intellectual journey with a non-foundational notion of truth and meaning in view. Ishmael also envisages pragmatists' beliefs that experience is fluid in nature and the universe is in a constant state of becoming. Yet Ishmael as the narrator of Moby-Dick is more functional than foundational.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Bauerlein, Mark, "The Pragmatic Mind: Explorations in the Psychology of Belief" (1997), Duke UP
  2. Bell, Michael Davitt, "The Development of American Romance : The Sacrifice of Relation" (1980), U of Chicago P
  3. Brodtkorb, Paul, "Ishmael’s White World : A Phenomenological Reading of Moby-Dick" (1965), Yale UP
  4. Cavell, Stanley, "The Senses of Walden. 5th ed" (1992), U of Chicago P
  5. Fiedelson, Charles Jr, "Symbolism and American Literature" (1953), U of Chicago P
  6. Dewey, John, "The Philosophy of John Dewey, 2nd ed" (1981), U of Chicago P
  7. Dryden, Edgar A, "Melville’s Thematics of Form: The Great Art of Telling the Truth" (1968), Johns Hopkins UP
  8. Fiedelson, Charles, Jr, "Symbolism and American Literature" (1953), U of Chicago P
  9. Gunn, Giles, "Thinking Across the American Grain: Ideology, Intellect, and the New Pragmatism" (1992), U of Chicago P
  10. James, William, "Essays in Radical Empiricism" (1976), Harvard UP
  11. James, William, "Pragmatism: Reader" (1997), Random House
  12. James, William, "William James: Pragmatism and The Meaning of Truth" (1978), Harvard UP
  13. James, William, "The Teaching of Philosophy in Our Colleges", Nation, 23, pp.170~181 (1876)
  14. James, William, "The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature" (1985), Penguin Books
  15. Lacoue-Labarthe, "Philippe and Jean-Luc Nancy. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism" (1988), State U of New York P
  16. Mcintosh, James, "The Mariner’s Multiple Quest, In New Essays on Moby-Dick", pp.23~52 (1986), Cambridge UP
  17. Melville, Herman, "The Confidence-Man: His Masquerade" (1954), Hendricks House Inc
  18. Melville, Herman, "Harrison Hayford and Hershel Parker" (1967), Norton
  19. Mumford, Lewis, "Herman Melville" (1929), Jonathan Cape
  20. Poirier, Richard, "Poetry and Pragmatism" (1992), Harvard UP
  21. Poirier, Richard, "The Renewal of Literature: Emersonian Reflections" (1987), Random House
  22. Rauber, D. F., "The Fragment as Romantic Form", Modern Language Quarterly, 30, pp.212~221 (1969)
  23. Richardson, Joan, "A Natural History of Pragmatism" (2007), Cambridge UP
  24. Rorty, Richard, "Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980" (1982), U of Minnesota
  25. Richardson, Joan, "Philosophy without Principles, In Against Theory: Literary and the New Pragmatism", pp.132~138 (1985), U of Chicago P
  26. Schlegel, Friedreich, "Lucinde and the Fragments" (1971), U of Minnesota P
  27. Selby, Nick, "Herman Melville: Columbia Critical Guides" (1998), Columbia UP
  28. Shusterman, Richard, "The Use of Pragmatism and Its Logic of Pluralism: A Response to Alttieri and Grabes", Pragmatism and Literary Studies: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, 15, pp.151~159 (1999)
  29. Shusterman, Richard, "Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art" (1992), Blackwell
  30. Stuhr, John J, "Looking toward Last Things: James’s Pragmatism Beyond Its Fist Century, In 100 Years of Pragmatism: William James’s Revolutionary Philosophy", pp.194~207 (2010), Indiana UP
  31. West, Cornel, "The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism" (1989), U of Wisconsin P
  32. Wheeler, Kathleen M, "Romanticism, Pragmatism, and Deconstruction" (1993), Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)