본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

What Poetry Can Do for the World: The Case of John Keats’s The Fall of Hyperion and Lamia

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This essay attempts to explicate how John Keats’s poetic practice embodies a sense of contradiction and instability in response to the historical conditions that distorted his original poetic ideals through a reading of The Fall of Hyperion and Lamia. Initially, Keats connection with Leigh Hunt and his circle invited him to the world where poets as liberal intellectuals fulfill the public good by their writing practice, but this connection caused Tory reviewers to identify Keats as a “Cockney” poet, signifying their strong contempt for him. This Cockney identity made a far-reaching impact on his literary career, since this identity stigmatized not only his poetic practice and political creeds but all the material conditions on which his personal life was based, and thus his original ideal of enlightening the public with his poetry came to be deflected by a growing sense of anxiety over the reading public. This unstable phase of Keats’s life, indeed, represents the problematic material conditions of his contemporary poets in general. In the literary public sphere of the early nineteenth century, the act of posing questions open to uncertainties in The Fall of Hyperion and the aspiration to complete love or poetic beauty by enacting self-erasure in Lamia were the only realistic forms of communication that Keats’s poetic practice could conceive of in the face of prevailing conservative politics and commercialized publishing markets. These works, in this sense, can be said to embody the historical limitations and challenges imposed on literary intellectuals at that time and the public sphere that had been formed by their poetic practices.

Abstract

This essay attempts to explicate how John Keats’s poetic practice embodies a sense of contradiction and instability in response to the historical conditions that distorted his original poetic ideals through a reading of The Fall of Hyperion and Lamia. Initially, Keats connection with Leigh Hunt and his circle invited him to the world where poets as liberal intellectuals fulfill the public good by their writing practice, but this connection caused Tory reviewers to identify Keats as a “Cockney” poet, signifying their strong contempt for him. This Cockney identity made a far-reaching impact on his literary career, since this identity stigmatized not only his poetic practice and political creeds but all the material conditions on which his personal life was based, and thus his original ideal of enlightening the public with his poetry came to be deflected by a growing sense of anxiety over the reading public. This unstable phase of Keats’s life, indeed, represents the problematic material conditions of his contemporary poets in general. In the literary public sphere of the early nineteenth century, the act of posing questions open to uncertainties in The Fall of Hyperion and the aspiration to complete love or poetic beauty by enacting self-erasure in Lamia were the only realistic forms of communication that Keats’s poetic practice could conceive of in the face of prevailing conservative politics and commercialized publishing markets. These works, in this sense, can be said to embody the historical limitations and challenges imposed on literary intellectuals at that time and the public sphere that had been formed by their poetic practices.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Barnard, John, "John Keats" (1987), Cambridge UP
  2. Bate, Walter Jackson, "John Keats" (1964), Harvard UP
  3. Butler, Marilyn, "Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760-1830" (1982), Oxford UP
  4. Cox, Jeffrey N, "The Cambridge Companion to Keats", pp.53~68 (2001), Cambridge UP
  5. Cox, Jeffrey N, "Poetry and Politics in the Cockney School : Keats, Shelley, Hunt and Their Circle" (1998), Cambridge UP
  6. Evert, Walter. H., "Aesthetic and Myth in the Poetry of Keats" (1965), Princeton UP
  7. Gilmartin, Kevin, "Writing against Revolution: Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790-1832" (2007), Cambridge UP
  8. Hoagwood, Terence, "Keats and Social Context : Lamia", Studies in English Literature, 29, pp.675~697 (1989)[DOI]
  9. Hoagwood, Terence, "Keats and History", pp.127~142 (1995), Cambridge UP
  10. Keats, John, "Complete Poems of John Keats" (1978), Harvard UP
  11. Keats, John, "Keats: The Complete Poems" (1970), Longman
  12. Keats, John, "The Letters of John Keats 1814-1821, 2 vols" (1821), Harvard UP
  13. Kim, Jong-Soong, "Keats’s Historical Consciousness", The Journal of English Language & Literature, 46(3), pp.787~806 (2000)
  14. Levinson, Marjorie, "Keats’s Life of Allegory: The Origin of a Style" (1988), Blackwell
  15. 오복남, "키츠의 “소극적 능력”과 『하이페리언』에 드러난 정치의식", 영어영문학연구, 57(2), pp.187~205 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  16. 박혜영, "키츠의 유토피아적 상상력과 정치의식* 하이페리온 시편들을 중심으로", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (24), pp.348~377 (2008), 영미문학연구회
  17. Roe, Nicholas, "John Keats" (2012), Yale UP
  18. Roe, Nicholas, "John Keats and the Culture of Dissent" (1997), Clarendon
  19. Ruthven, K. K., "Keats and Dea Moneta", Studies in Romanticism, 15(3), pp.445~459 (1976)
  20. Watkins, Daniel, "Keats’s Poetry and the Politics of the Imagination" (1989), Associated University Presses
  21. Wordsworth, William, "The Prelude 1799, 1805, 1850" (1979), Norton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)