Primary School Students’ Understanding of Equation Structure and the Meaning of Equal Sign: A Chinese Sample Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Thispaper reports findings from a written assessment which was designed to investigate Chinese primary school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equation structure. The investigation included a sample of 110 Grade 3, 112 Grade 4, and 110 Grade 5 students from four schools in China. Significant differences were identified among the three grades and no gender differences were found. The majority of Grades 3 and 4 students were found to view the equal sign as a place indicator meaning “write the answer here” or “do something like computation”, that is, holding an operational view of the equal sign. A part of Grade 5 students were found to be able to interpret the equal sign as meaning “the same as”, that is, holding a relational view of the equal sign. In addition, even though it was difficult for Grade 3 students to recognize the underlying structure in arithmetic equation, quite a number of Grades 4 and 5 students were able to recognize the underlying structure on some tasks. Findings in this study suggest that Chinese primary school students demonstrate a relational understanding of the equal sign and a strong structural sense of equations in an earlier grade. Moreover, what found in the study support the argument that students’ understanding of the equal sign is influenced by the context in which the equal sign is presented.
Abstract
Thispaper reports findings from a written assessment which was designed to investigate Chinese primary school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equation structure. The investigation included a sample of 110 Grade 3, 112 Grade 4, and 110 Grade 5 students from four schools in China. Significant differences were identified among the three grades and no gender differences were found. The majority of Grades 3 and 4 students were found to view the equal sign as a place indicator meaning “write the answer here” or “do something like computation”, that is, holding an operational view of the equal sign. A part of Grade 5 students were found to be able to interpret the equal sign as meaning “the same as”, that is, holding a relational view of the equal sign. In addition, even though it was difficult for Grade 3 students to recognize the underlying structure in arithmetic equation, quite a number of Grades 4 and 5 students were able to recognize the underlying structure on some tasks. Findings in this study suggest that Chinese primary school students demonstrate a relational understanding of the equal sign and a strong structural sense of equations in an earlier grade. Moreover, what found in the study support the argument that students’ understanding of the equal sign is influenced by the context in which the equal sign is presented.
참고문헌 (27)
- Alibali, M. W., "A longitudinal examination of middle school students' understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations", Math. Think. Learn, 9(3), pp.221~246 (2007)
- Asquith, P., "Middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable", Math. Think. Learn, 9(3), pp.247~270 (2007)
- Baroody, A. J., "The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the"equals"sign", Elementary School Journal, 84, pp.199~212 (1983)
- Behr, M., "How children view the equal sign", Math, Teaching, 92, pp.13~15 (1980)
- Cai, J., "Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives", pp.25~41 (2011), Springer
- Cajori, F., "A history of mathematical notations: Vol. I, Notations in Elementary Mathematics" (1928), Open Court
- Carpenter, T. P., "Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in the elementary school" (2003), Heinemann
- Falkner, K. P., "Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra", Teach. Child. Math, 6(4), pp.232~236 (1999)
- Hattikudur, S., "Learning about the equal sign: Does comparing with inequality symbols help?", Journal of experimental child psychology, 107(1), pp.15~30 (2010)
- Jones, I., "Substitution and sameness : Two components of a relational conception of the equals sign", Journal of experimental child psychology, 113(1), pp.166~176 (2012)
- Jones, I., "Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign", Res. Math. Educ, 15(1), pp.34~49 (2013)
- Jones, I., "A substituting meaning for the equals sign in arithmetic notating tasks", J. Res. Math. Educ, 43(1), pp.2~33 (2012)
- Kieran, C., "Concepts associated with the equality symbol", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), pp.317~326 (1981)
- Kieran, C., "Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning", pp.707~762 (2007), Information Age
- Knuth, E. J., "Middle school students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & variable", ZDM, Zentralbl. Didakt. Math, 37(1), pp.68~76 (2005)
- Knuth, E. J., "Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations", J. Res. Math. Educ, 37(4), pp.297~312 (2006)
- Li, X., "Sources of differences in children's understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and the United States", Cogn. Instr, 26(2), pp.195~217 (2008)
- Matthews, P., "Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about children's understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality", J. Res. Math. Educ, 43(3), pp.316~334 (2012)
- McNeil, N. M., "U-shaped development in math : 7-Year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems", Developmental Psychology, 43(3), pp.687~695 (2007)
- McNeil, N. M., "Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience : All contexts are not created equal", Journal of Cognition & Development, 6, pp.385~406 (2005)
- McNeil, N. M., "Benefits of practicing 4 = 2 + 2 : Nontraditional problem formats facilitate children's understanding of mathematical equivalence", Child development, 82(5), pp.1620~1633 (2011)
- McNeil, N. M., "Middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign : The books they read can't help", Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), pp.367~385 (2006)
- Powell, S. R., "Equations and the equal sign in elementary mathematics textbooks", Elementary School Journal, 112(4), pp.627~648 (2012)
- Rittle-Johnson, B., "Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence. A construct-modeling approach", Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, pp.85~104 (2011)
- Seo, K. -H., "The development of arithmetic concepts and skills", pp.161~187 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Stephens, A. C., "Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign: The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students' understandings", J. Math. Behav, 32(2), pp.173~182 (2013)
- Stigler, J. W., "Culture and mathematics learning", Review of research in education, 15, pp.253~306 (1988), American Educational research Association