한국 시경론의 비평론적 접근
A critical Approach of Korean Shikyung-Ron
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This paper examines the methods of analysis and problems of “criticism of the old testament”, “reduction criticism”, “anatomy of criticism”, “social criticism”, “reader-response criticism”, which are divided according to the nature of the materials to find out a new way to study Shikyung. The materials related to Shikyung-Ron are not exactly categorized in the way shown in this paper; however, this study apples characteristics of various methods that analyze materials to integrate different ways of adopted criticism. Shikyung-Ron internally has characteristics of social criticism and readerresponse criticism, but it externally shows characteristics of historicalbiographical criticism with standards of their arguments. However, most studies on Shikyung-Ron take positions to support research materials or subjects of research and ignore problems that derived from the characteristics of Kyunghak-Ron seeking the absolute truth and integrating various ways of criticism. Even though the materials have significant meanings in terms of social criticism, their internal errors should be examined and criticized to study Shikyung-Ron properly. However, until recently most researchers does not point out the errors and take the same positions as ones found in the materials of previous studies. In addition, there was not enough detailed examination about the materials that belong to historical-biographical criticism, which makes it difficult to draw a ideological tendency. An approach is needed that considers methods of various criticisms to make studies of Shikyung-Ron proceed in the future. In addition, the value of materials related to Shikyung-Ron should be judged according to the characteristics of criticisms after categorizing them carefully.
참고문헌 (5)
- 김수경, "다산 시경학에 있어서의 흥에 대한 연구」" (2003)
- 스티븐헤이넨스, "성서비평방법론과 그 적용" (2003), 대한기독교서회
- 이병찬, "韓中詩經論의 問題點과 再認識」", 42, pp.177~200 (2003)
- 이병찬, "한국의 시경론 연구" (2001)
- 한예원, "정다산 시경해석의 방법적 특색」", (3), pp.63~95 (2002), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 한국문화연구소
