본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Development of Mathematical Task Analytic Framework: Proactive and Reactive Features

김정연|김진호|권나영|여승현|조호윤|임웅
한국수학교육학회|2022.12|Mathematics Education Research and Practice|제25권 제4호|pp. 285-309|DOI https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2022.25.4.285

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

cognitive complexitymathematical taskstask analytic frameworktask features

초록

A large body of previous studies investigated mathematical tasks by analyzing the design process prior to lessons or textbooks. While researchers have revealed the significant roles of mathematical tasks within written curricular, there has been a call for studies about how mathematical tasks are implemented or what is experienced and learned by students as enacted curriculum. This article proposes a mathematical task analytic framework based on a holistic definition of tasks encompassing both written tasks and the process of task enactment. We synthesized the features of the mathematical tasks and developed a task analytic framework with multiple dimensions: breadth, depth, bridging, openness, and interaction. We also applied the scoring rubric to analyze three multiplication tasks to illustrate the framework by its five dimensions. We illustrate how a series of tasks are analyzed through the framework when students are engaged in multiplicative thinking. The framework can provide important information about the qualities of planned tasks for mathematics instruction (proactive) and the qualities of implemented tasks during instruction (reactive). This framework will be beneficial for curriculum designers to design rich tasks with more careful consideration of how each feature of the tasks would be attained and for teachers to transform mathematical tasks with the provision of meaningful learning activities into implementation.

Abstract

A large body of previous studies investigated mathematical tasks by analyzing the design process prior to lessons or textbooks. While researchers have revealed the significant roles of mathematical tasks within written curricular, there has been a call for studies about how mathematical tasks are implemented or what is experienced and learned by students as enacted curriculum. This article proposes a mathematical task analytic framework based on a holistic definition of tasks encompassing both written tasks and the process of task enactment. We synthesized the features of the mathematical tasks and developed a task analytic framework with multiple dimensions: breadth, depth, bridging, openness, and interaction. We also applied the scoring rubric to analyze three multiplication tasks to illustrate the framework by its five dimensions. We illustrate how a series of tasks are analyzed through the framework when students are engaged in multiplicative thinking. The framework can provide important information about the qualities of planned tasks for mathematics instruction (proactive) and the qualities of implemented tasks during instruction (reactive). This framework will be beneficial for curriculum designers to design rich tasks with more careful consideration of how each feature of the tasks would be attained and for teachers to transform mathematical tasks with the provision of meaningful learning activities into implementation.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. Arbaugh, F., "Analyzing mathematical tasks : A catalyst for change", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(6), pp.499~536 (2005)
  2. Baumert, J., "Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress", American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), pp.133~180 (2010)
  3. Berg, C. V., "From designing to implementing mathematical tasks : Investigating the changes in the nature of the T-shirt task", The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9(3), pp.347~358 (2012)
  4. Boston, M. D., "Assessing instructional quality in mathematics", The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), pp.76~104 (2012)
  5. Boston, M. D., "The instructional quality assessment as a tool for reflecting on instructional practice", ZDM, 50(3), pp.427~444 (2018)
  6. Boston, M. D., "Transforming secondary mathematics teaching : Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers' classrooms", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), pp.119~156 (2009)
  7. Carpenter, T. P., "Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding" (1997), Heinemann
  8. Charalambous, C. Y., "Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding : An exploratory study", The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), pp.247~278 (2010)
  9. Christiansen, B., "Perspectives on mathematics education", pp.243~307 (1986), Reidel Publishing Company
  10. Civil, M., "Transitions between contexts of mathematical practices", pp.149~169 (2002), Kluwer
  11. Clarke, D., "Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, pp.95~108 (2018)
  12. Cohen, D. K., "Resources, instruction, and research", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), pp.119~142 (2003)
  13. Crespo, S., "Learning to pose mathematical problems : Exploring changes in preservice teachers' practices", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), pp.243~270 (2003)
  14. Doyle, W., "Academic work", Review of Educational Research, 53(2), pp.159~199 (1983)
  15. Doyle, W., "Work in mathematics classes : The context of students' thinking during instruction", Educational Psychologist, 23(2), pp.167~180 (1988)
  16. Drake, C., "Three strategies for opening curriculum spaces", Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(6), pp.346~353 (2015)
  17. Fan, L., "Representation of problem-solving procedures : A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), pp.61~75 (2007)
  18. Francisco, J. M., "Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning : Lessons from an after-school research program", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), pp.49~66 (2011)
  19. Giménez, J., "Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22. ICMI studies", pp.581~590 (2013)
  20. Henningsen, M., "Mathematical tasks and student cognition : Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), pp.524~549 (1997)
  21. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., "Mapping mathematics in classroom discourse", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), pp.451~485 (2011)
  22. Herbst, P., "On the instructional triangle and sources of justification for actions in mathematics teaching", ZDM, 44(5), pp.601~612 (2012)
  23. Hiebert, J., "Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic", American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), pp.393~425 (1993)
  24. Hiebert, J., "Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction : The case of mathematics", Educational Researcher, 25(4), pp.12~21 (1996)
  25. Horoks, J., "Tasks designed to highlight task-activity relationships", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), pp.279~287 (2007)
  26. Jäder, J., "Students’ mathematical reasoning and beliefs in non-routine task solving", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), pp.759~776 (2017)
  27. Jitendra, A. K., "A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving", Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), pp.115~ (2007)
  28. Kazemi, E., "Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms", Journal of Education, 189(1-2), pp.123~137 (2009)
  29. Kim, J., "Instructional materials for learner-centered mathematics instruction", Educational Research in Science and Mathematics, 37, pp.169~185 (2014)
  30. Kim, J., "Mathematics classroom for students to enjoy: Grade 3 addition and subtraction" (2020), Kyoyook Book
  31. Kim, J, "Mathematics classroom for students to enjoy: Grade 3 multiplication and division" (2021), Kyoyook Book
  32. Kisker, E. E., "The potential of a culturally based supplemental mathematics curriculum to improve the mathematics performance of Alaska Native and other students", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), pp.75~113 (2012)
  33. König, J., "General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among preservice teachers", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), pp.800~822 (2020)
  34. Lampert, M., "Teaching problems and the problems of teaching" (2001), Yale University Press
  35. Lave, J., "Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  36. Li, Y., "A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), pp.234~241 (2000)
  37. Liljedahl, P., "Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, grades K-12: 14 teaching practices for enhancing learning" (2020), Corwin Press
  38. Liljedahl, P., "Interweaving mathematics and pedagogy in task design: A tale of one task", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), pp.239~249 (2007)
  39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Professional standards for teaching mathematics", ~ (1991)
  40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics", ~ (2000)
  41. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics., "Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all", ~ (2014)
  42. National Research Council, "Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics" (2001), The National Academies Press
  43. Ni, Y., "Relations of instructional tasks to teacher–student discourse in mathematics classrooms of Chinese primary schools", Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), pp.2~43 (2014)
  44. Norton, A., "Learning to pose cognitively demanding tasks through letter writing", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(2), pp.109~130 (2012)
  45. Polly, D., "Examining how professional development influences elementary school teachers’ enacted instructional practices and students’ evidence of mathematical understanding", Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(4), pp.565~582 (2015)
  46. Raymond, A. M., "Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), pp.550~576 (1997)
  47. Remillard, J. T., "Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula", Review of Educational Research, 75(2), pp.211~246 (2005)
  48. Romberg, T., "Mathematical thinking and problem solving", pp.287~304 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  49. Ruthven, K., "Design tools in didactical research : Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences", Educational Researcher, 38(5), pp.329~342 (2009)
  50. Scardamalia, M., "Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.97~118 (2006)
  51. Schmidt, W. H., "A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education" (1997), Kluwer Academic
  52. Schoenfeld, A. H., "On paradigms and methods : What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), pp.179~214 (1992)
  53. Shaughnessy, M., "Formatively assessing prospective teachers’ skills in leading mathematics discussions", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(3), pp.451~472 (2021)
  54. Sherin, M. G., "A balancing act : Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), pp.205~233 (2002)
  55. Simon, M. A., "Participatory and anticipatory stages of mathematical concept learning : Further empirical and theoretical development", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), pp.63~93 (2016)
  56. Singer, F. M., "Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems : Implications for assessment of mathematical creativity", ZDM, 49(1), pp.37~52 (2017)
  57. Son, J. W., "A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity : The case of fraction addition and subtraction", ZDM, 44(2), pp.161~174 (2012)
  58. Son, J. W., "How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), pp.117~142 (2010)
  59. Stein, M. K., "Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development" (2000), Teachers College Press
  60. Stein, M. K., "Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning : An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms", American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), pp.455~488 (1996)
  61. Stein, M. K., "Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection : From research to practice", Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), pp.268~275 (1998)
  62. Stein, M. K., "Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development" (2009), Teachers College Press and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  63. Stillman, G., "Impact of prior knowledge of task context on approaches to applications tasks", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), pp.333~361 (2000)
  64. Tarr, J. E., "From the written to the enacted curricula : The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students' opportunity to learn", School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), pp.191~201 (2006)
  65. Tarr, J. E., "The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), pp.247~280 (2008)
  66. Tekkumru-Kisa, M., "Theory and research on tasks revisited : Task as a context for students’ thinking in the era of ambitious reforms in mathematics and science", Educational Researcher, 49(8), pp.606~617 (2020)
  67. van de Walle, J. A., "Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally" (2019), Pearson
  68. Watson, A., "Taken-as-shared : A review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, pp.205~215 (2007)
  69. Watson, A., "Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study", pp.3~15 (2015), Springer
  70. Wijaya, A., "Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), pp.41~65 (2015)
  71. Yeh, C., "Reimagining the mathematics classroom: Creating and sustaining productive learning environments, K-6", National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ~ (2016)
  72. Yeo, J. B., "Development of a framework to characterise the openness of mathematical tasks", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), pp.175~191 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

Reconceptualizing Learning Goals and Teaching Practices: Implementation of Open-Ended Mathematical Tasks김진호, Sheunghyun Yeo한국수학교육학회 · Mathematics Education Research and Practice2019 · 제22권 제1호Lesson Planning: How Do Pre-service Teachers Benefit from Examining Lesson Plans with Mathematics Teaching Practices as an Analytical Lens?김희정, 이지은, Woong Lim한국수학교육학회 · 초등수학교육2016 · 제19권 제3호초등학교 수학 지도서의 교육적 특징 분석틀 개발 연구박예진, 방정숙, 오민영한국수학교육학회 · 초등수학교육2023 · 제26권 제4호The Relationship between Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing and Responsive Teaching: In the Context of Teaching for All Students’ Mathematical Thinking황성환한국수학교육학회 · Mathematics Education Research and Practice2022 · 제25권 제1호수학 교사의 주목하기와 반응적 교수의 관계 : 모든 학생의 수학적 사고 계발을 지향하는 수업 상황에서권오남, 김희정, 배미선, 한채린한국수학교육학회 · 수학교육2017 · 제56권 제3호An Analysis of the Mathematical Tasks in the Korean Seventh Grade Mathematics Textbooks and Workbook권오남, 조형미한국수학교육학회 · Mathematics Education Research and Practice2012 · 제16권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)

The Effect of Using Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics Lesson on Students' Metacognitive AwarenessAyşe Elitok Kesici, Hızır Küçükakça, 이지은pp. 245-266Analysis of the Construction and Effectiveness of Precision- Targeted Classroom Based on Analysis of Students’ Real Learning SituationChao Xiong, Xiuyun Yu, Jiaxin Chenpp. 267-284
원문 보기