대학 글쓰기 교육을 위한 예비적 고찰
A Preparatory Study for College Writing Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
notion of essay wiring and the academic validity of current essay writing education and to propose how to extend high school essay writing to the baccalaureate level of "post-essay-writing" effectively. The primary goals of integrated essay writing--that is, "critical thinking" and "problem-solving abilities"--are meaningful. However, the goals exceed the common scope and level of reading and writing curricular required by current secondary education. In addition, little attention has been given to how to connect high school essay writing and college writing. Consequently, the fundamental meaning of "integrated essay writing" becomes problematic. Essay writing and essay writing education should comply with the ideal of liberal arts for college education. In so doing, discussion education, reading education, and writing education should be designed in an integrated fashion for communication skills, basic cultivation, and logical and critical expressive abilities respectively. Reading education should be carried out in close relations with college writing education. Reading and writing have often been taught separately. However, they can do without each other. Therefore, college writing education should be designed to help students develope his or her own reading plans, and reading and writing can be separately taught only in case of specific purposes and styles. Besides, discussion education that deals with pros and cons may serve as a good model for college discussion education. In the case of reading education, free-style discussion can be added in order to precipitate cultural diversity and flexible interpretation. Especially, it can be efficient in dealing with major points of assigned readings and in developing students' presentation skills. Knowledge usually develops through the stages of dualism, multiplicity, relativism, and commitment. Either education which utilizes reading and discussion or reading/discussion education may be used for intellectual and ethical development.
Abstract
notion of essay wiring and the academic validity of current essay writing education and to propose how to extend high school essay writing to the baccalaureate level of "post-essay-writing" effectively. The primary goals of integrated essay writing--that is, "critical thinking" and "problem-solving abilities"--are meaningful. However, the goals exceed the common scope and level of reading and writing curricular required by current secondary education. In addition, little attention has been given to how to connect high school essay writing and college writing. Consequently, the fundamental meaning of "integrated essay writing" becomes problematic. Essay writing and essay writing education should comply with the ideal of liberal arts for college education. In so doing, discussion education, reading education, and writing education should be designed in an integrated fashion for communication skills, basic cultivation, and logical and critical expressive abilities respectively. Reading education should be carried out in close relations with college writing education. Reading and writing have often been taught separately. However, they can do without each other. Therefore, college writing education should be designed to help students develope his or her own reading plans, and reading and writing can be separately taught only in case of specific purposes and styles. Besides, discussion education that deals with pros and cons may serve as a good model for college discussion education. In the case of reading education, free-style discussion can be added in order to precipitate cultural diversity and flexible interpretation. Especially, it can be efficient in dealing with major points of assigned readings and in developing students' presentation skills. Knowledge usually develops through the stages of dualism, multiplicity, relativism, and commitment. Either education which utilizes reading and discussion or reading/discussion education may be used for intellectual and ethical development.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김광수, "철학과 논술", 철학논총, 1(43), pp.393~414 (2006), 새한철학회
- 김복순, "비판적 사고의 한계와 ‘통합적 말글쓰기’의 전망", 30집 (2006), 한국문학연구회
- 김영정, "비판적 사고와 학술적 글쓰기" (2003)
- 김영정, "통합교과형 논술의 특징", (69) (2006), 철학문화연구소
- 박재현, "한국의 토론문화와 토론교육", 19집 (2004)
- "인문 교육 근본: 글쓰기 교육의 이론과 실제―철학교육의 관점에서" (2003), 한국철학사상연구회
- "철학사상 별책 제4권" (2004), 서울대 철학사상연구소
- "학술적 글쓰기의 평가에 대한 일고찰", 33(1) (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
- "비평적 사고력 증진을 위한 소설 교육", 29집 (2006), 한국문학연구회
- "인문교양교육의 의미와 과제", 37집 (2006), 성균관대학교 인문과학연구소
- "대학 글쓰기에서의 글쓰기 교육의 위상과 ‘학술적 글쓰기’ 모델", (65) (2005), 철학문화연구소
- "대학생들의 학술적 글쓰기 능력 신장을 위한 작문교육 방법", (51) (2005), 민족어문학회
- "대입 평가 도구로서의 통합 교과 논술에 대한 일고찰" (2006), 한국작문학회
- "논증과 글쓰기" (2006), 형설출판사
- "토론의 개념과 토론식 학습의 개념" (2006)
- "논술시험은 우리에게 무엇인가?-논술시험의 사회문화적 고찰", (19) (2005)
- 이선옥, "토론수업과 논리적 글쓰기의 연관성 연구-숙명여대 사례를 중심으로" (2006), 포항공대 인문사회학부
- 이형래, "공무원의 직업문식성 평가에 관한 연구" (2006)
- 정희모, "대학 글쓰기 교육과 과정 중심 방법의 적용", 29집 (2006), 한국문학연구회
- 최미리, "미국과 한국 대학의 교양교육 비교" (2001), 양서원
- 최복자, "토론교육의 수업 모형 개발 연구" (2006)
- 최연주, "대학 교양교육과정 개선을 위한 국내외 교양교육과정 비교분석" (2005)
- Lnda Flower, "Problem-Solving Strategies for writing, four edition, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993" (1998), 동문선
- Liona Leki, "Academic Writing: Exploring Process and Stratiges, second edition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Richard Paul, "Critical thingking: Tools for Talking Charge of Your Professional and Pre and Your Life" (2002), Prentice Hall