본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전후 ‘자유’ ‘개인’과 민족 주체의 문제- 김수영을 중심으로

The Problems of ‘Freedom', ‘Individual' and ‘Ethnic Subject' after Korea War - Focused on Poet Kim Soo-young

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper was on integrating into poems the problem of ‘individual subjectivism', the frequently emerging agendum in poem collections by Poet Kim Soo-young, in other words, common and epic dialects and the word of “I" as the confession word, in an effort to discuss whether the subject of poems by Kim Soo-young was dealt with in the aspect of ‘modern individual'. From the perspective of ethnicity and individual subjectivism-based Korean history, ‘individual' and ‘individual subjectivism' seems to have gradually been at ebb in the face of the words of ‘liberty’ and ‘individual’ pandemic throughout early the 1950s. The end of the 1960s led to a change of liberal democracy to ethnic nationalism. The erosion of the concept, ‘liberty’ and the emphasis of the concept, ‘ethnicity’ impelled ‘liberty’ to advance into political one, not autonomous individual ethical concept. Appearing in poem collection by Kim Soo-young, “I" appear to have been associated with poetic traits of intellectual self-awareness, integrity and consciousness based on direct and real experiences. But, strictly speaking, the word of “I" written by confession style was depicted as the word not as ‘modern individual’ but as ‘ethnic and collective subjectivism’. As to family, typical private and privacy domain, Poet Kim Soo-young was not so much focused on modern individual tastes and autonomous consumption rights, but he mirrored the absolute distaste of western materialism, giving insight into nationalism -oriented modern subjectivism. In this manner, ethnic subjectivism-based modernist attempted to engage in the worldand make the world objectivize, in light of “I” and “You”, looking at the history and era through the view of right and sound world, as part of a bid to hold ethnic subjectivism at the stage of cultural transition in complex era. In the respect, the word of ‘individual’ by Kim Soo-young can be referred to as the meaning of ethnic and collective subjectivism-based individual, rather than ‘non-nationalism liberal individual'.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was on integrating into poems the problem of ‘individual subjectivism', the frequently emerging agendum in poem collections by Poet Kim Soo-young, in other words, common and epic dialects and the word of “I" as the confession word, in an effort to discuss whether the subject of poems by Kim Soo-young was dealt with in the aspect of ‘modern individual'. From the perspective of ethnicity and individual subjectivism-based Korean history, ‘individual' and ‘individual subjectivism' seems to have gradually been at ebb in the face of the words of ‘liberty’ and ‘individual’ pandemic throughout early the 1950s. The end of the 1960s led to a change of liberal democracy to ethnic nationalism. The erosion of the concept, ‘liberty’ and the emphasis of the concept, ‘ethnicity’ impelled ‘liberty’ to advance into political one, not autonomous individual ethical concept. Appearing in poem collection by Kim Soo-young, “I" appear to have been associated with poetic traits of intellectual self-awareness, integrity and consciousness based on direct and real experiences. But, strictly speaking, the word of “I" written by confession style was depicted as the word not as ‘modern individual’ but as ‘ethnic and collective subjectivism’. As to family, typical private and privacy domain, Poet Kim Soo-young was not so much focused on modern individual tastes and autonomous consumption rights, but he mirrored the absolute distaste of western materialism, giving insight into nationalism -oriented modern subjectivism. In this manner, ethnic subjectivism-based modernist attempted to engage in the worldand make the world objectivize, in light of “I” and “You”, looking at the history and era through the view of right and sound world, as part of a bid to hold ethnic subjectivism at the stage of cultural transition in complex era. In the respect, the word of ‘individual’ by Kim Soo-young can be referred to as the meaning of ethnic and collective subjectivism-based individual, rather than ‘non-nationalism liberal individual'.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 권보드래, "실존, 자유부인, 프래그머티즘 ― 1950년대의 두 가지 ‘자유’ 개념과 문화", 한국문학연구, 35(35), pp.101~147 (2008), 한국문학연구소
  2. 권보드래, "한국 근대소설의 기원" (2000), 소명출판
  3. 권보드래, "1950년대 시민의 개념과 담론 in: 식민지-제국의 해체와 전후 동아시아 문화질서의 재편", 동국대학교 문화학술원 국제학술회의 (2008)
  4. 김병익, "60년대 문학의 가능성in: 현대한국문학의 이론" (1971), 민음사
  5. 김수영, "김수영전집 2" (1981), 민음사
  6. 김승희, "김수영의 시와 탈식민주의적 반(反)언술 in: 김수영 다시읽기" (2000), 프레스21
  7. 김종윤, "김수영론-정직성과 비극적 현실인식", 석사, pp.1982
  8. 김주현, "1960년대 '한국적인 것'의 담론 지형과 신세대 의식", 상허학보, 16, pp.379~410 (2006), 상허학회
  9. 김준오, "문학사와 장르" (2000), 문학과지성사
  10. 김진만, "전후의 젊은이들", 사상계 (1963)
  11. 김하태, "한국에 있어서의 아메리카니즘", 사상계 (1959)
  12. 박수연, "친일과 배타적 동양주의", 한국문학연구, (34), pp.191~214 (2008), 한국문학연구소
  13. 박수연, "김수영 문학의 원체험" (2004), 실천문학
  14. 박승희, "1950년대 김수영 시의 국가", 개인 문제와 시민성, 2008, pp.43, 187~211[DOI]
  15. 박연희, "전후, 실존, 시민-청년 모더니스트 박인환을 중심으로 in: 식민지-제국의 해체와 전후 동아시아 문화질서의 재편", 동국대학교 문화학술원 국제학술회의 (2008)
  16. 백철, "고전부활과 현대문학", 현대문학 (1957)
  17. 소영현, "1940년 전후 동양 담론 분석-전통과 근대의 대결구도를 중심으로", 상허학보, 4 (1998)
  18. 안병욱, "자유의 가치", 사상계 (1955)
  19. 위르겐 슈람케, "현대소설의 이론" (1995), 문예출판사
  20. 이근식, "상생적 자유주의-자유, 평등, 상생과 사회발전" (2009), 돌베개
  21. 이진우, "라이버시의 철학-자유의 토대로서의 개인주의" (2009), 돌베개
  22. 임병권, "고백을 통해 본 내면성의 정착과 주체의 형성-현상윤과 양건식을 중심으로 in: 한국 근대문학의 형성과 문학 장의 재발견" (2004), 소명출판
  23. 정병욱, "고전과 현대문학의 제과제", 자유문학 (1956)
  24. 정병욱, "고전의 현대화 논의", 사상계 (1957)
  25. 정병욱, "우리 문학의 전통과 인습", 사상계 (1958)
  26. 정인홍, "정치적 현실과 그 이상", 신사조 (1962)
  27. 조동일, "한국 소설의 이론" (1977), 지식산업사
  28. 조의설, "그리스의 세계관", 사상계 (1956)
  29. 한명희, "김수영 정신분석으로 읽기" (2002), 월인
  30. 황동규, "김수영의 문학" (1983), 민음사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)