Notes on Copy Raising Constructions in English
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we will investigate properties and various analyses of copy raising (CR) constructions in English, and suggest the parallel movement analysis. We will propose that CR subject is raised to [Spec, T] of the matrix clause from [Spec, T] of the embedded clause. Simultaneously, the edge-feature (EF) of C in the matrix clause forces CR-subject to be moved to [Spec, C] of the matrix clause from [Spec, T] of the embedded clause. Copy raising constructions are ambiguous between a thematic and a nonthematic reading for the subject. To capture the duality of CR subject, we suggest that the non-thematic use of CR subjects is possible in case that the copy in [Spec, T] of the matrix clause is pronounced at PF component among three copies of CR subject, based on the parallel movement analysis. In contrast, the thematic use of CR subjects is available in case that the copy in [Spec, C] of the matrix clause is pronounced at PF component among three copies of CR subject. Given these proposals, we will conclude that the parallel movement analysis can explain properties of CR subject in English
Abstract
In this paper, we will investigate properties and various analyses of copy raising (CR) constructions in English, and suggest the parallel movement analysis. We will propose that CR subject is raised to [Spec, T] of the matrix clause from [Spec, T] of the embedded clause. Simultaneously, the edge-feature (EF) of C in the matrix clause forces CR-subject to be moved to [Spec, C] of the matrix clause from [Spec, T] of the embedded clause. Copy raising constructions are ambiguous between a thematic and a nonthematic reading for the subject. To capture the duality of CR subject, we suggest that the non-thematic use of CR subjects is possible in case that the copy in [Spec, T] of the matrix clause is pronounced at PF component among three copies of CR subject, based on the parallel movement analysis. In contrast, the thematic use of CR subjects is available in case that the copy in [Spec, C] of the matrix clause is pronounced at PF component among three copies of CR subject. Given these proposals, we will conclude that the parallel movement analysis can explain properties of CR subject in English
참고문헌 (29)
- Asudeh, A, "Richard III in CLS 38: The Main Session vol. 1", pp.31~46 (2002), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Asudeh, A, "Resumption as Resource Management", 박사, pp.2004
- Asudeh, A, "Copy Raising and Its Consequences for Perceptual Reports in Architectures, Rules, and Preferences: Variations on Themes by Joan W. Bresnan", pp.49~67 (2007), CSLI Publications
- Browning, M, "Null Operator Constructions", 박사, pp.1987
- Chomsky, N, "On Wh-movement in Formal Syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky, N, "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory in The View from Building 20", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework in Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy in Structures and Beyond", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N, "Approaching UG from Below in Interfaces + Recursion =Language?", Mouton de Gruyter, pp.1~29 (2007)
- Chomsky, N, "On Phases in Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chung, S, "Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian" (1978), University of Texas Press
- Davies, W. D, "The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation" (2004), Blackwell
- D´eprez, V, "Raising Constructions in Haitian Creole", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, pp.191~131 (1992)
- Fujii, T, "Cycle, Linearization of Chains, and Multiple Case Checking", Console XIII. Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, pp.39~65 (2005)
- Heycock, C, "Layers of Predication" (1994), Garland
- Jespersen, O, "The Philosophy of Grammar" (1924), University of Chicago Press
- Kaplan-Myrth,A, "The Movement Rule Formerly Known as Richard" (2000), Yale University
- 권기양, "Some Notes on Parallel Movement", 언어과학, 16(2), pp.165~187 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- Lappin, S, "Predication and Raising", GLSA, pp.236~252 (1984)
- Landau, I, "Predication vs. Aboutness in Copy Raising" (2009), Ben Gurion University
- McCloskey, J, "Control and A-chains in Modern Irish", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.143~189 (1988)
- Moore, J, "Turkish Copy-Raising and A-Chain Locality", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, pp.149~189 (1998)
- Postal, P, "On Raising" (1974), MIT Press
- Potsdam, E, "Richard Returns: Copy Raising and its Implications in CLS 37: The Main Session vol. 1", pp.453~468 (2001), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Rogers, A, "Another Look at Flip Perception Verbs", In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.303~315 (1972)
- Rogers, A, "Physical Perception Verbs in English: A Study in Lexical Relatedness", 박사, pp.1973
- Rogers, A, "A Transderivational Constraint on Richard?", Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.551~558 (1974)
- Ura, H, "Checking, Economy, and Copy-Raising in Igbo", Linguistic Analysis, 28, pp.67~88 (1998)
- Williams, E, "NP Trace in Theta Theory", Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, pp.433~447 (1987)