본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 it 분열구문에 대한 RRG 분석

It-Cleft Construction in English: An RRG Account

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to provide a Role and Reference Grammar(RRG) account of it-cleft construction in English. The followings are claimed in this paper. First, it is claimed that English it-cleft construction is considered as the construction in which the cleft pronoun it serves both specificational and expletive functions and the cleft constituents are not the parts of the predicates. Moreover, the cleft clause is claimed to be a kind of relative clause. This claim leads us to postulate an alternative Layered Structure of Clause, which is different from the one proposed by Pavey(2004). Second, the be' predicates should be doubly marked at the Logical Structures to reflect two functions, in which the first one is for the semantic function, and the second one, for the pragmatic. Third, the cleft construction is different from the it-exptraposition construction, in that the mixed approach does not apply to the it-exptraposition construction, and the function of be predicate is predicational.

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a Role and Reference Grammar(RRG) account of it-cleft construction in English. The followings are claimed in this paper. First, it is claimed that English it-cleft construction is considered as the construction in which the cleft pronoun it serves both specificational and expletive functions and the cleft constituents are not the parts of the predicates. Moreover, the cleft clause is claimed to be a kind of relative clause. This claim leads us to postulate an alternative Layered Structure of Clause, which is different from the one proposed by Pavey(2004). Second, the be' predicates should be doubly marked at the Logical Structures to reflect two functions, in which the first one is for the semantic function, and the second one, for the pragmatic. Third, the cleft construction is different from the it-exptraposition construction, in that the mixed approach does not apply to the it-exptraposition construction, and the function of be predicate is predicational.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김두식, "등차성(gradience) 관점에서 본 영어 분열문의 분석", 언어과학연구, (62), pp.1~40 (2012), 언어과학회
  2. 이생근, "예기 it 의 지시적 지위", 언어학, 13(3), pp.125~144 (2005), 대한언어학회
  3. 전성호, "Levinon의 GCI 이론을 통한 ‘거시기’의 화용론적 분석", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.159~179 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  4. Adger, D., "Predication and Equation", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), pp.325~359 (2003)
  5. Bolinger, D., "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
  6. DeClerck, R., "Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudoclefts" (1988), Foris
  7. Hedberg, N, "The Referential Status of Clefts", Language, 76(2), pp.891~920 (2000)
  8. Heycock, C, "Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.365~397 (1999)
  9. Higgins, R., "The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English" (1979), Garland
  10. Huddleston, R., "Introduction to the Grammar of English" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  11. Johansson, M., "Clefts in English and Swedish: A Contrastive Study of It-cleft and Wh-clefts in Original Texts and Translation", 박사, pp.2002
  12. Kaltenbock, G, "It-Extraposition in English: A Functional View", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(2), pp.119~159 (2005)
  13. 김종복, "On the Syntax of the It-Cleft Construction: A Construction-based Perspective", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.45~68 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  14. Lambrecht, K, "A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions", Linguistics, 39(3), pp.463~516 (2001)
  15. Mair, C., "Infinitival Complement Clauses: A Study of Syntax in Discourse" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  16. Pavey, E., "The English It-Ceft Construction: A Role and Reference Grammar Analysis", 박사, pp.2004
  17. Reeve, M, "The Syntactic Structure of English Clefts", Lingua, 121, pp.142~171 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)