영어의 집합명사의 구분에 관한 연구
A Study on the Distinction of Collective Nouns in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible ways of dividing collective nouns into three groups: aggregate noun, collective noun and superordinate. The preceding studies had difficulty suggesting clear criteria on dividing collective nouns. For example, there were no clear standards on classifying furniture as a mass noun and tool as a countable noun even though collective nouns such as furniture, tool are distinguished a set of countable entities. Also, it was difficult to reveal characteristics that collective noun like committee is different from collective nouns like furniture, tool. Therefore, in this study, five arguments(countability vs. non-countability, contiguity vs. similarity, inheritance vs. non-inheritance, kind of vs. part of, individuation vs. non-individuation) were presented to suggest a new clear-cut terminology that distinguishes collective nouns, aggregate nouns and superordinates. And it was concluded that collective nouns and superordinates tend to show the opposite pattern and aggregate nouns share the both characteristics of collective nouns and superordinates, but aggregate noun has more superordiante characteristics
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible ways of dividing collective nouns into three groups: aggregate noun, collective noun and superordinate. The preceding studies had difficulty suggesting clear criteria on dividing collective nouns. For example, there were no clear standards on classifying furniture as a mass noun and tool as a countable noun even though collective nouns such as furniture, tool are distinguished a set of countable entities. Also, it was difficult to reveal characteristics that collective noun like committee is different from collective nouns like furniture, tool. Therefore, in this study, five arguments(countability vs. non-countability, contiguity vs. similarity, inheritance vs. non-inheritance, kind of vs. part of, individuation vs. non-individuation) were presented to suggest a new clear-cut terminology that distinguishes collective nouns, aggregate nouns and superordinates. And it was concluded that collective nouns and superordinates tend to show the opposite pattern and aggregate nouns share the both characteristics of collective nouns and superordinates, but aggregate noun has more superordiante characteristics
참고문헌 (18)
- 박병수, "현대 영문법의 이해" (2014), 한국 문화사
- 오주영, "영어 명사의 인지적 학습에 관한 연구", 언어과학, 14(1), pp.127~140 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- Bloom, P., "Possible Individuals in Language and Cognition", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, pp.90~94 (1996)
- Gil, D., "Collective Nouns : A Typological Perspective", Rivista di Linguistica, 8, pp.53~57 (1996)
- Jespersen, O., "The Philosophy of Grammar" (1924), George Allen & Unwin
- Joosten, F., "Accounts of the Count-Mass Distinction : A Critical Survey", Lingvisticae Investigationes, 26, pp.159~173 (2003)
- Joosten, F., "Collective Nouns, Aggregate Nouns and Superordinate", Lingvisticae Investigationes, 33(1), pp.25~49 (2010)
- Langacker, W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar" (1987), Standford University Press
- Levin, M., "Agreement with Collective Nouns in English", Lund Studies in English, 103, pp.14~18 (2001)
- Markman E., "Classes and Collections", Cognitive Psychology, 8, pp.561~577 (1976)
- Michaux, C., "The Collectives in French : a Linguistic Investigation", Lingvisticae Investigationes, 16, pp.99~124 (1992)
- Middleton, E. L., "Separating the Chaff from the Oats: Evidence for a Conceptual Distinction between Count and Mass Noun Aggregates", Journal of Memory and Language, 50, pp.371~394 (2004)
- Mihastch W., "Taxonomic and Meronomic Superordinates with Nominal Coding", Cognitive Psychology, 60, pp.359~377 (2007)
- Speelman, D., "Abundantia Verborum : a Computer Yool for Carrying out Corpusbased Linguistic Case Studies", Doctor, pp.1997
- Wierzbicka, A., "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins
- Wisniewski, E. J., "On the Equivalence of Superordinate Concepts", Cognition, 60, pp.269~298 (1996)
- Wisniewski, E. J., "On the Conceptual Basis for the Count and Mass Noun Distinction", Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5), pp.583~624 (2003)
- Winston, M. E., "A Taxonomy of Part–hole Relations", Cognitive Science, 11, pp.417~444 (1987)