본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Syntactic Analysis of Temporal Properties in Korean

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This article investigates the time-related morphological units, such as tense, mood, and aspect, in Korean embedded clauses, and their morpho-syntactic relations. We claim that modality is dependent on tense within TP by sharing temporal features (e.g., [+anterior] and [+posterior]) with the tense marker (e.g. -ess), and modality also shares the same position in a predicate with the tense marker, whe18reas mood is projected to MP (Mood Phrase) headed by clause-final morphemes (e.g., ta, ca, or la). Adopting Vendler’s (1967) predicate types, Chomsky’s (1999, 2001) Probe-Goal approach, and Ura’s (2006) analysis of the aspect-related feature, we suggest that lexical aspect manifests the projection of the two types of Aspectual Phrases (e.g., AspP with [u Stative] or [Dynamic]) between vP and TP. This study demonstrates specified temporal properties in the Korean language by exhibiting semantically, morphologically, and syntactically motivated multi-layered Functional Categories such as [CP[MP[TP[AspP]]]] in overt syntax

Abstract

This article investigates the time-related morphological units, such as tense, mood, and aspect, in Korean embedded clauses, and their morpho-syntactic relations. We claim that modality is dependent on tense within TP by sharing temporal features (e.g., [+anterior] and [+posterior]) with the tense marker (e.g. -ess), and modality also shares the same position in a predicate with the tense marker, whe18reas mood is projected to MP (Mood Phrase) headed by clause-final morphemes (e.g., ta, ca, or la). Adopting Vendler’s (1967) predicate types, Chomsky’s (1999, 2001) Probe-Goal approach, and Ura’s (2006) analysis of the aspect-related feature, we suggest that lexical aspect manifests the projection of the two types of Aspectual Phrases (e.g., AspP with [u Stative] or [Dynamic]) between vP and TP. This study demonstrates specified temporal properties in the Korean language by exhibiting semantically, morphologically, and syntactically motivated multi-layered Functional Categories such as [CP[MP[TP[AspP]]]] in overt syntax

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Adger, D., "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2004), Oxford University Press
  2. Ahn, H-D., "Light Verbs, VP-movement, Negation and Clausal Architecture in Korean and English", Ph. D., pp.1991
  3. Bybee, J., "Modality in Grammar and Discourse" (1995), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  4. Cho, D-I., "Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics", pp.233~254 (1994), CSLI Publications, Stanford University
  5. Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (1999), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky, N., "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", Unpublished Manuscript, MIT, ~ (2001)
  7. Darzi, A., "Syntax and Semantics of Subjunctive Clauses in Persian", Lingua, 153, pp.1~13 (2015)
  8. On the Syntax of Argument Structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers, "Hale, K.", MIT, Center for Cognitive Science, ~ (1991)
  9. Hale, K., "Heads, Projections, and Learnability, Vol.1", pp.53~71 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  10. 김동민, "The Korean relativizer -l from the viewpoint of linguistic evolution", 한국어학, 62, pp.123~147 (2014), 한국어학회
  11. 고보애, "Applying Systemic Functional Grammar to Korean Texts: Transitivity, Mood", Modality, and Theme, 2018, pp.(79), 45~76[DOI]
  12. Larson, R., "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
  13. Larson, R., "Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.589~632 (1990)
  14. Lee, H B., "The Category of Mood in Korean Transformational Grammar", Language Research, 7(1), pp.53~78 (1971)
  15. Lee, H S., "Tense, Aspect, and Modality: a Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective", Ph.D., pp.1991
  16. Lee, M., "Dissociations among Functional Categories in Korean Agrammatism", Brain and Language, 84, pp.170~188 (2003)
  17. Leech, G., "Meaning and the English Verb" (2004), Longman
  18. Li, P., "The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  19. 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
  20. Lyons, J., "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  21. McCloskey, J., "Clause Structure, Ellipsis and Proper Government in Irish", Lingua, 85, pp.259~302 (1991)
  22. 목정수, "유형론과 정신역학론의 관점에서 본 한국어 서법과 양태", 한국어학, 70, pp.55~108 (2016), 한국어학회[DOI]
  23. Palmer, F., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  24. Polinsky, M., "Deconstructing Ergativity: Two Types of Eargative Languages and Their Features. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax" (2016)
  25. Saeed, J., "Semantics" (2009), Blackwell
  26. Sohn, H-M., "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  27. Sohn, S-O., "Tense and Aspect in Korean" (1995), University of Hawaii Press
  28. Ura, H., "Ergativity", pp.111~141 (2006), Springer
  29. Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)