국어 명사구의 유형에 대하여
On the Types of the Noun Phrase in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I examine synthetically the types of the Noun Phrase in Korean which can be compared with the sentence types in sentence grammar. The types of NP in Korean are classified into the NP of ‘argument+head noun’, the NP of ‘adjunct+NP’, the juxtaposition NP and the Equivalents of NP. The NP of ‘argument+head noun’ is secondarily classified into the predicative NP and the non-predicative NP. In the predicative NPs, I presented the total 46 types of NPs, that is the six types having one argument, the 18 types having two arguments, the 18 types having three arguments and the four types having arguments of a variable number. In the non-predicative NPs, I presented the total 29 types of NPs, that is the 12 types having one argument, the 12 types having two arguments and the five types having arguments of a variable number. The juxtaposition NP is secondarily classfied into conjunctive NP, paraphrase NP and appositive NP. The NP of ‘adjunct+NP’ is secondarily classified into adnoun-modifying NP, adnominal clause-modifying NP, genitive KP-modifying NP, NP-modifying NP, pseudo adnominal-modifying NP, adnominal NP-modifying NP and adverbial-modifying NP. The conjunctive NP is thirdly classified into josa(Korean particle for NP)-conjuntive NP, adverb-conjunctive NP, conjugation form-conjunctive NP and emumeration NP. The appositive NP is thirdly classified into full appositive NP and partial appositive NP. Futhermore, the co-reference in appositive NP is classified into the semantic one and the pragmatic one on the one hand, and into the independent one, the unilateral one and the mutual one on the other hand. Finally, after examining the X'-theory and Projection Principle fundamentally, I argue about the equivalents of NP, which lack of a head noun or, if any, which is not its projection category.
Abstract
In this paper, I examine synthetically the types of the Noun Phrase in Korean which can be compared with the sentence types in sentence grammar. The types of NP in Korean are classified into the NP of ‘argument+head noun’, the NP of ‘adjunct+NP’, the juxtaposition NP and the Equivalents of NP. The NP of ‘argument+head noun’ is secondarily classified into the predicative NP and the non-predicative NP. In the predicative NPs, I presented the total 46 types of NPs, that is the six types having one argument, the 18 types having two arguments, the 18 types having three arguments and the four types having arguments of a variable number. In the non-predicative NPs, I presented the total 29 types of NPs, that is the 12 types having one argument, the 12 types having two arguments and the five types having arguments of a variable number. The juxtaposition NP is secondarily classfied into conjunctive NP, paraphrase NP and appositive NP. The NP of ‘adjunct+NP’ is secondarily classified into adnoun-modifying NP, adnominal clause-modifying NP, genitive KP-modifying NP, NP-modifying NP, pseudo adnominal-modifying NP, adnominal NP-modifying NP and adverbial-modifying NP. The conjunctive NP is thirdly classified into josa(Korean particle for NP)-conjuntive NP, adverb-conjunctive NP, conjugation form-conjunctive NP and emumeration NP. The appositive NP is thirdly classified into full appositive NP and partial appositive NP. Futhermore, the co-reference in appositive NP is classified into the semantic one and the pragmatic one on the one hand, and into the independent one, the unilateral one and the mutual one on the other hand. Finally, after examining the X'-theory and Projection Principle fundamentally, I argue about the equivalents of NP, which lack of a head noun or, if any, which is not its projection category.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김기혁, "관형 구성의 통어 현상과 의미 관계", 한글, 209, pp.59~98 (1990), 한글학회
- 김기혁, ""국어 문법 연구-형태.통어론"" (1995), 박이정
- 김병일, "국어 명사의 내적 구조 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 김용하, "국어 명사구의 구조 연구", 석사, pp.1991
- 노명희, "한자어의 어휘형태론적 특성에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1990
- 유현경, "‘주다’ 구문에 나타나는 조사 ‘에게’와 ‘에’", 한국어학, 20, pp.155~174 (2003), 한국어학회
- 유현경, "‘에게’와 유정성" 형태론", 어학전문지, 9(2), pp.257~275 (2007), 편집위원회
- 이선웅, "‘의문사+(이)-+-ㄴ가’ 구성의 부정(不定) 표현에 대하여", 국어학, 36, pp.191~219 (2000)
- 이선웅, "국어의 한자어 관형명사에 대하여", 한국문화, 26, pp.35~58 (2000), 서울대학교 한국문화연구소
- 이선웅, "국어 명사구의 논항구조 연구" (2005), 월인
- 이선웅, "제7차 교육과정의 문법 교과서와 교사용 지도서 검토―‘단어’와 ‘문장’ 단원을 중심으로", 어문연구, 131, pp.447~472 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
- 이선웅, "술어명사구와 동사구의 동질성과 이질성", 우리말글, 38, pp.107~133 (2006), 우리말글학회
- 이선웅, "국어 지칭어.호칭어의 명사구 형성 문법", 우리말글, 40, pp.123~145 (2007), 우리말글학회
- 이선웅, "국어 동격 명사구의 개념과 유형", 어문학, 98, pp.159~185 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 이정훈, "조사와 활용형의 범주통용 ―‘이’계 형식을 대상으로―", 국어학, 45, pp.145~175 (2005), 국어학회
- 이현우, "현대 국어의 명사구의 구조 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 이홍식, "현대국어 관형절 연구", 국어연구, 98 (1990), 국어연구회
- 임홍빈, "국어의 명사구 확장 규칙에 대하여", 국어학, 16, pp.379~430 (1987), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, ""국어 문법의 심층 2"" (1998), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사구조에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 24, pp.1~62 (1999), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 임홍빈, ""한국어 구문 분석 방법론"" (2002), 한국문화사
- Chomsky,N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), The MIT Press
- Chomsky,N., "Lectures on Government and Binding Theory" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky,N., "Barriers" (1986), The MIT Press
- Chomsky,N., "Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Jackendoff,R., "X'-Syntax:A Study of Phrase Structure" (1977), The MIT Press
- Martin,S., "A Reference Grammar of Korean" (1992), Charles E.Tuttle Company
- Radford,A., "Transformational Grammar" (1988), Cambridge University Press
