‘詩言志’의 過程詩學的 硏究

Abstract

The departure of literary criticism should come from a universal objectivity as a mortgage. That's because criticism of a lack of objectivity does not permanent. However, literary criticism are happened to be often explained in terms of viewpoint ignoring this objectivity. This article introduces the concept of process philosophy which claims partially objective truth. In case of 'Shi-Un-Ji(Poem Means Launguage)'is the same. Through combining the meaning of Ji(knowing) and other concepts, it deepens the literary criticism. This process is rightly Hap-Seng(concrescence) of process philosophy. Ji of 'Shi-Un-Ji' becomes concrescence with particular factors such as Do(reason), Sung-Jung(temper and heart), and Gi(energy) which are mainly uttered in literature essence theory and like in case of Gyemik Jeon or Sukwang Lee, its middle step is omitted and Ji and Shin(soul), Ji and Gyoung(status) are happened to directly become concrescence. Additionally like in case of Yeob-Sub(harmonized leaves), there was a succeeding case for theory to be elaborated as the extended meaning through concrescence that fussed with Li(logic) and Jung(affection) being seemingly contrasted. Different concrescence is achieved also among experiencing subjects with the same objective conditions according to each subjective interest, because objective factor matching with focus consciously is different. But this process of concrescence is difficult to see that deducts a successfully complete theory and the limit is definitely present. It proves above that the case of the later works with highly developed literary theory beyond Shi-Gyoung(Chinese great poem book) and Dang-Shi(Chinese dang dynasty poem) is rare. As Whitehead pointed out, that is because a result of knowledge that we have achieved is always partial so that there is a possibility to correct and open. However, regardless of whether the result is succeeded or not, the methodology of this process philosophy as the process of concrescence to understand literary theory has a significant meaning. Because of various criticisms of the other partial element to reflect around the world, as proving the claims that could be objective and be different, it can be used actively to recognize each criticism having a positive value. In this study, the process of philosophical methodology attempted as a new analysis of understanding literary criticism would be utilized in the reevaluation and the analysis of plenty of theories.