유길준 문법에서 문법 단위와 문장의 종류
A Study on the Grammatical Units and Kinds of Sentence in Yu Giljun's Grammar
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Daehanmunjeon(1908) consists of three grammatical unit system such as 'word-phrase-sentence'. The 'phrase' in this Daehanmunjeon(1908) refers to both a 'phrase' and a 'clause' in modern Korean grammar system. In this regard, the linguistic forms which are in the medium phase between a word and a sentence correspond to a 'phrase' in Daehanmunjeon(1908). There are three kinds of sentences--Danmun(단문), Bokmun(복문), and Yeon-gumun(연구문) in Daehanmunjeon(1908). Danmun is comprised of a 'subject' and a 'predicate' and Bokmun consists of two or more subjects and predicates. Yeongumun is comprised of a precedent clause and a following clause which are connected by a 'conjunctor'. It is hard to discriminate Yeongumun from Bokmun. The reason Deahnmunjeon(1908) only distinguishes between the simple sentence and the conjunction sentence in modern Korean grammar is mainly due to insufficient differentiation of grammatical units. However, the grammatical units of Daehanmunjeon(1909) are four unit system such as 'word-phrase-clause-sentence'. Daehanmunjeon(1909) systemically describes the types of sentences by establishing the different grammatical units, a 'phrase' and a 'clause'. There are three kinds of sentences-a simple sentence(Danmun), a complex sentence(Bokmun), and a duplex sentence(Jungmun) in Daehanmunjeon(1909). The simple sentence doesn't include the sentence having a 'clause' and the complex sentence includes the sentence involving additional clauses such as 'a nominal clause, an adjective clause or an adverbial clause'. The complex sentence corresponds to the matrix sentence which has a embedded sentence in modern Korean grammar. The duplex sentence which is applicant to the conjuncting complex sentence in modern Korean grammar involves an independent clause. The reason Daehanmunjeon(1909) could systemically describe the types of sentences is that it perceives the construction of a 'clause' and establishes a 'clause' as a distinct grammatical unit.
Abstract
Daehanmunjeon(1908) consists of three grammatical unit system such as 'word-phrase-sentence'. The 'phrase' in this Daehanmunjeon(1908) refers to both a 'phrase' and a 'clause' in modern Korean grammar system. In this regard, the linguistic forms which are in the medium phase between a word and a sentence correspond to a 'phrase' in Daehanmunjeon(1908). There are three kinds of sentences--Danmun(단문), Bokmun(복문), and Yeon-gumun(연구문) in Daehanmunjeon(1908). Danmun is comprised of a 'subject' and a 'predicate' and Bokmun consists of two or more subjects and predicates. Yeongumun is comprised of a precedent clause and a following clause which are connected by a 'conjunctor'. It is hard to discriminate Yeongumun from Bokmun. The reason Deahnmunjeon(1908) only distinguishes between the simple sentence and the conjunction sentence in modern Korean grammar is mainly due to insufficient differentiation of grammatical units. However, the grammatical units of Daehanmunjeon(1909) are four unit system such as 'word-phrase-clause-sentence'. Daehanmunjeon(1909) systemically describes the types of sentences by establishing the different grammatical units, a 'phrase' and a 'clause'. There are three kinds of sentences-a simple sentence(Danmun), a complex sentence(Bokmun), and a duplex sentence(Jungmun) in Daehanmunjeon(1909). The simple sentence doesn't include the sentence having a 'clause' and the complex sentence includes the sentence involving additional clauses such as 'a nominal clause, an adjective clause or an adverbial clause'. The complex sentence corresponds to the matrix sentence which has a embedded sentence in modern Korean grammar. The duplex sentence which is applicant to the conjuncting complex sentence in modern Korean grammar involves an independent clause. The reason Daehanmunjeon(1909) could systemically describe the types of sentences is that it perceives the construction of a 'clause' and establishes a 'clause' as a distinct grammatical unit.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김민수, "朝鮮文典(1894년 이후)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 김민수, "朝鮮文典(1905년 이전)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 김민수, "朝鮮文典(1906년 이전)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 김민수, "大韓文典(1907년 이전)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 김민수, "大韓文典(1908년 간행)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 김민수, "大韓文典(1909년 간행)", 역대한국문법대계 제1부, ~ (1977)
- 강복수, "국어 문법사 연구" (1975), 형설출판사
- 김민수, "신국어학사" (1974), 일조각
- 김인택, "한국어 내포절의 범주 설정에 대하여", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (40), pp.3~88 (2002), 한민족어문학회
- 남경완, "쉽게 풀이한 대한문전, In 민연 국어학 총서" (2003)
- 박지홍, "유 길준의 「조선문전」", 어문교육논집, 2, pp.9~25 (1977), 부산대국어교육과
- 김인택, "근대 지식인의 언어 인식" (2009), 박이정
- 최낙복, "유길준 문법의 품사 설정", 국어국문학, 13, pp.79~102 (1994), 동아대 국어국문학과
- 최낙복, "유길준 문법의 조동사", 국어국문학, 14, pp.131~154 (1995), 동아대 국어국문학과
- 최낙복, "유길준 문법의 형태론 연구", 언어와 언어교육, 10, pp.107~151 (1995)
- 최낙복, "유 길준 말본의 통어론 연구", 한힌샘 주시경연구, 14(15), pp.151~185 (2002)
- 최낙복, "최광옥 문법의 통어론 연구", 부산 한글, 23, pp.27~50 (2004)
