본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

표찰화 관점에서 본 작용역의 중의성

Scope Ambiguity from a Labeling Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

A different scope behavior between double object construction (DOC) and prepositional dative construction (PDC) in English is one of the topics that has been much discussed to see how it can be syntactically accounted for. We can elucidate this puzzling data if (i) we adopt Labeling Algorithm (LA) (Chomsky 2015) and (ii) deploy Feature Splitting Internal Merge (Obata and Epstein, 2011). Given that DOC and PDC have distinct underlying structures posited by Bruening(2001,2010,2018), we can naturally capture the asymmetry of scope interaction between the two constructions. The resulting labels can be defined as a concomitant of LA via Feature Splitting Internal Merge. This paper also explores some unclear issues in the mechanism of labeling, {XP[F], YP[F]}

Abstract

A different scope behavior between double object construction (DOC) and prepositional dative construction (PDC) in English is one of the topics that has been much discussed to see how it can be syntactically accounted for. We can elucidate this puzzling data if (i) we adopt Labeling Algorithm (LA) (Chomsky 2015) and (ii) deploy Feature Splitting Internal Merge (Obata and Epstein, 2011). Given that DOC and PDC have distinct underlying structures posited by Bruening(2001,2010,2018), we can naturally capture the asymmetry of scope interaction between the two constructions. The resulting labels can be defined as a concomitant of LA via Feature Splitting Internal Merge. This paper also explores some unclear issues in the mechanism of labeling, {XP[F], YP[F]}

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 전혜원, "양화사 작용역 현상의 최소화에 관한 탐구", 인문사회과학연구, 19(1), pp.163~187 (2018), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
  2. Aoun, J, "Syntax of Scope" (1993), The MIT Press
  3. Boskovic´, Z., "Superiority Effects with Multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian", Ms., pp.1995
  4. Bruening, B., "QR Obeys Superiority: ACD and Frozen Scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), pp.233~273 (2001)
  5. Bruening, B., "Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.287~305 (2010)
  6. Bruening, B., "Double Object Constructions and Prepositional Dative Constructions are Distinct: A Reply to Ormazabal and Romero", Linguistic Inquiry, 49, pp.123~150 (2018)
  7. Chomsky, N., "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton
  8. Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), Mouton
  9. Chomsky, N., "Readings in English Transformational Grammar", pp.184~221 (1970), Ginn
  10. Chomsky, N., "Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), The MIT Press
  11. Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), The MIT Press
  12. Chomky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  13. Chomky, N., "Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.3~16 (2015), John Benjamins
  14. Drummond, A., "A puzzle about P-stranding and a possible solution", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(4), pp.689~692 (2010)
  15. Epstein, S., "Labeling by Minimal Search: Implications for Successive-Cyclic A-Movement and the Conception of the Postulate "Phase"", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.463~481 (2014)
  16. Fox, D., "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  17. Gallego, A., "Phase Theory" (2010), John Benjamins
  18. Harley, H., "Subjects, Events and Licensing", Doctoral, pp.1995
  19. Harley, H., "Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2" (2002)
  20. Haegeman, L., "English Grammar" (1999), Blackwell Publishers
  21. Hornstein, N., "Logical Form" (1995), Blackwell
  22. Hornstein, N., "Working Minimalism" (1999), The MIT Press
  23. Hornstein, N, "Basic Operations: Minimal Syntax - Semantics", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, pp.113~139 (2009)
  24. Jackendoff, R., "Syntax: A study of Phrase Structure" (1977), The MIT Press
  25. Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structures" (1989), The MIT Press
  26. Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and Pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation", 영어학, 4(1), pp.1~31 (2004), 한국영어학회
  27. Larson, R., "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.335~391 (1988)
  28. Larson, R., "Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff", Linguistic Inquiry, 21(34), pp.589~632 (1990)
  29. 1993, , 113~150
  30. May, R., "Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation" (1985), MIT Press
  31. Obata, M., "Deducing Improper Movement from Phase Based C-to-T Phi Transfer: Feature Splitting Internal Merge", The proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.353~360 (2008), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  32. Obata, M., "Feature Splitting Internal Merge: Improper Movement Intervention and the A", A'-distinction, 2011, pp.14, 122~147
  33. Obata, M., "Phases", pp.173~194 (2012), DE GRUYTER MOUTON
  34. Pinker, S., "Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
  35. Pesetsky, D., "Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades" (1995), MIT Press
  36. Pesetsky, D., "Morphology and Logical Form", Linguistic Inquiry, 16(2), pp.193~246 (1995)
  37. Reinhart, T., "Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.29~56 (1997)
  38. Linguistics Today Series, "Non-definiteness and Plurality. Linguistik Aktuell", pp.2006, Reinhart, T.
  39. Richards, N., "What Moves Where When in Which Language?", Ph. D., pp.1997
  40. Rudin, C., "On Multiple Questions and Multiple WH Fronting", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.445~501 (1988)
  41. Spencer, A., "The Handbook of Morphology" (2001), Blackwell Publisher
  42. Siegel, D., "Topics in English Morphology", Ph. D., pp.1974
  43. John Stonham, "On the Inherent Complexity of Language: The Interatction of Numerals and Incorporation", Journal of Universal Language, 8(2), pp.79~103 (2007), 언어연구소
  44. Tang, S. W., "On QU-Features", UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, pp.191~204 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)